Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Gastronomy Brand Value Components on Travel Intention: A Case of a Route

Pages
276–295
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the province of Hatay, it was determined that only the brand loyalty dimension had a positive effect on travel intention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to determine the effect of brand image, perceived quality, brand awareness and brand loyalty components on the travel intention which constitutes gastronomic brand value.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to correlation analysis, the brand size that has the strongest relationship with travel intention was brand loyalty for Adana province (.738), brand awareness size for Mersin (.666) and brand loyalty size for Hatay (.757).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the province of Hatay, it was determined that only the brand loyalty dimension had a positive effect on travel intention.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gastronomi Turizmi · Marka Değeri · Marka Bileşenleri

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the effect of brand image, perceived quality, brand awareness and brand loyalty components on the travel intention which constitutes gastronomic brand value. Within the scope of the research, questionnaires were applied to local tourists in Adana, Mersin and Hatay, who stand out with their culinary culture and gastronomy resources. According to correlation analysis, the brand size that has the strongest relationship with travel intention was brand loyalty for Adana province (.738), brand awareness size for Mersin (.666) and brand loyalty size for Hatay (.757). Brand loyalty, brand awareness and brand image dimensions have a positive effect on travel intention for Adana and Mersin provinces. For the province of Hatay, it was determined that only the brand loyalty dimension had a positive effect on travel intention.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı gastronomi marka değerini oluşturan marka imajı, algılanan kalite, marka farkındalığı ve marka sadakati bileşenlerinin seyahat niyeti üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmeye çalışılmasıdır. Araştırma kapsamında mutfak kültürü ve gastronomi kaynakları ile öne çıkan Adana, Mersin ve Hatay illerinde yerli turistlere anket uygulanmıştır. Korelasyon analizine göre göre seyahat niyeti ile en güçlü ilişkiye sahip olan marka boyutunun Adana ili için marka sadakati (.738), Mersin için marka farkındalığı boyutu (.666) ve Hatay için marka sadakati boyutu (.757) olduğu belirlenmiştir. Adana ve Mersin illeri için marka sadakati, marka farkındalığı ve marka imajı boyutları seyahat niyeti üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahiptir. Hatay ili için ise sadece marka sadakati boyutunun seyahat niyeti üzerinde pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAÇAT, S. O., HASEKİ, M. İ., BUZCU, Z. (2020). The Effect of Gastronomy Brand Value Components on Travel Intention: A Case of a Route. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 276–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/339561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Altunışık, R., Çoşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. and Yıldırım, E. (2007). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı. 5th Edition, Sakarya: Sakarya Publishing. Amira F. (2009). The Role of Local Food in Maldives Tourism: A Focus on Promotion and Economic Development. New Zealand Tourism Research Institute. Master Thesis. Askegaard, S. and Kjeldgaard, D. (2007).
  2. Here, There, and Everywhere: Place Branding and Gastronomical Globalization in a Macromarketing Perspective. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(2), 138-147.
  3. Boo, S., Busser, J. and Baloglu, S. (2009). A Model of Customer-Based Brand Equity and its Application to Multiple Destinations. Tourism Management 30(2), 219–231. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.06.003 Ceylan, S. (2011). Destinasyon Marka İmajı ve Pamukkale Yöresinde Bir Uygulama. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies. Year: 4 (7), 89-102.
  4. Chang, R. C. Y. and Mak, A. H. N. (2018). Understanding Gastronomic İmage From Tourists’ Perspective: A Repertory Grid Approach. Tourism Management, 68, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.004.
  5. Chi. H. K., Huang K. C. and Nguyen, H. M. (2019). Elements of Destination Brand Equity and Destination Familiarity Regarding Travel İntention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.012.
  6. Chow I. H., Lau, V. P., Lo, T. W. C., Sha, Z., and Yun, H. (2007). Service quality in restaurant operations in China: Decision and Experiential-Oriented Perspectives. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(3), 698-710. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.07.001 Cohen, E. and Avieli, N. (2004). Food in Tourism: Attraction and Impediment. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 755–778.
  7. Çalışkan, O. (2013). Destinasyon Rekabetçiliği ve Seyahat Motivasyonu Bakımından Gastronomik Kimlik. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 1/2, 39-51.
  8. Çetin, Ş. (1993). Turizm Endüstrisine Mutfak Elemanı Yetiştirmeye Yönelik Eğitim Programlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova University. Institute of Social Sciences. Educational Sciences. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Çetinsöz, B. C. and Artuğer, S. (2013). Antalya İli’nin Marka Değerinin Ölçülmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Anatolia: Journal of Tourism Research, 24(2), 200-210.
  9. Fernandez, J. A. F., Cerro, A. M. C. and Mogollon, J. M. H. (2019). Potential of Olive Oil Tourism in Promoting Local Quality Food Products: A Case Study of the Region of Extremadura, Spain. Heliyon, 5(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.he