SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 33

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCES OF INTERIOR DESIGN STUDENTS IN CREATIVE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Anıl SÜVARİ
MERVE BULDAÇ
Pages
1488–1516
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Not to benefit from the positive effects of hand drawing and the use of ready-made materials to destroy the original design are the negative consequences of the use of digital technology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this work is assessing the use of digital technology in relation to the creative thinking process in Interior Design education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fourth grade students (39 people) in Interior Design department of a state university located in the Central Anatolia Region in Turkey are the participants of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Not to benefit from the positive effects of hand drawing and the use of ready-made materials to destroy the original design are the negative consequences of the use of digital technology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this work is assessing the use of digital technology in relation to the creative thinking process in Interior Design education. For this purpose, the effects of digital technologies on the creative design development process in interior design education were examined through student experiences. Fourth grade students (39 people) in Interior Design department of a state university located in the Central Anatolia Region in Turkey are the participants of the study. Identification of participants; being volunteer to attend; taking the basic design / art education, computer-aided design and final interior design project courses. Torrance is an important person who contributes to literacy in the measurement of creativity and in this research open-ended questions were asked to the students according to four elements (fluency, flexibility, originality and enrichment) defined by Torrance's creativity. In the research, phenomenological approach was used from qualitative research methods and data were analyzed by content data analysis. According to the findings, it has been detected that students use digital technologies for research on internet, technical drawings in computer, making 3D visualizations and preparing documents with text-image support. As a results enhance design alternatives, improve the quality of interior design and ease the design intervention are the positive consequences of the use of digital technology. Not to benefit from the positive effects of hand drawing and the use of ready-made materials to destroy the original design are the negative consequences of the use of digital technology.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜVARİ, A., BULDAÇ, M. (2018). DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCES OF INTERIOR DESIGN STUDENTS IN CREATIVE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 33, 1488–1516. https://ajindex.com/articles/339532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Altın, M. A. (2012). Özgün İç Mekan Bileşenlerinin Üretiminde Bilgisayar Destekli Tasarım ve Üretim. Yayınlanmamış Sanatta Yeterlik Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. Altın, M. A. (2016). İnsan mekan etkileşimi: mekana yansımaları ve gelece dair değerlendirmeler. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 54-76.
  2. Bartlett, M., & Davis, G. A. (1974). “Do the Wallach and Kogan Tests Predict Real Creative Behavior.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39. Dede, C. (1995). “The Evolution of Constructivist Learning Environments: Immersion in Distributed Virtual Worlds.” Educational Technology, 45-52.
  3. Fisher, R. (1995). Teaching Children to Think. Oxford: Blackwell Lmt. Gençaydın, Z. (1990). Sanat Eğitiminin Düşünsel Temelleri Ortaöğretim Kurumlarında Resim-İş Öğretimi ve Sorunları. Ankara:
  4. Şafak Matbaacılık. Hatırnaz, A. (2010). Tasarım Eğitiminde Yaratıcılığı Geliştirmeye Yönelik Yöntem Önerisi: Tasarım Döngüsü. Yayınlanmamış Sanatta Yeterlik Tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü: İstanbul.
  5. Holden, G., & Garner, S. (2005). “e-Learning in the Development of Design Skills and Knowledge at the Open University.” In: Design on eLearning, 14-15.
  6. Isacksen, S. G. (1984) “Organizational and Industrial Innovation: Using Critical and Creative Thinking. Conference on Critical Thinking.” Kingsborough Community College. Kaptan, B. (2013). Kültür ve İçmimarlık. Ankara:
  7. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Karakaya, A. F., & Demirkan, H. (2015). “Collaborative Digital Environments to Enhance the Creativity of Designers.” Computers in Human Behavior, 176-186.
  8. Kırışoğlu Tekin, O. (2009). Sanat Kültür Yaratıcılık Görsel Sanatlar ve Kültür Eğitimi-Öğretimi. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Landau, E. (1985). Creative Questioning For The Future. In J. Freeman. The Psychology of Gifted Children (pp. 70-90). London: John Wiley. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis. California: Sage Publications,Inc. Muldner, K., & Burleson, W. (2015). “Utilizing Sensor Data to Model Students’ Creativity in a Digital Environment.” Computers in Human Behavior, 127-137.
  10. Osborn, A. (1963). Your Creative Power. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Öztoprak, A., & Erbuğ, Ç. (2005). An Evaluation of an Online Collaborative Course. Proceedings of HCI International. Las Vegas: HCI International. Prensky, M. (2012). From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning. CA: Corwin Press.
  11. Roberts, L. (2003). Creativity. M