Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 32

THE EFFECT OF MOBILE SCIENCE SCHOOL II PROJECT ON THE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE AND MOTIVATION

Pages
1156–1170
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, 46 7 th grade students participated in the nature education project carried out in Samsun province of Turkey and supported by The Scientific and Techological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) constituted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to analyze the effect of a sample science school implementation designed on the basis of students’ stroll in different teaching environments and using different kinds of student-centered teaching methods on the attitudes of the secondary school students towards science and their motivation for learning science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the science school designed for this purpose, "Mobile Science School II" program including planetarium, observatory, laboratory, outdoor, hands-on activities, games, art workshops, seminars and creative drama applications were presented to the students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, 46 7 th grade students participated in the nature education project carried out in Samsun province of Turkey and supported by The Scientific and Techological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) constituted.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, it was aimed to analyze the effect of a sample science school implementation designed on the basis of students’ stroll in different teaching environments and using different kinds of student-centered teaching methods on the attitudes of the secondary school students towards science and their motivation for learning science. In the science school designed for this purpose, "Mobile Science School II" program including planetarium, observatory, laboratory, outdoor, hands-on activities, games, art workshops, seminars and creative drama applications were presented to the students. In this context, 46 7 th grade students participated in the nature education project carried out in Samsun province of Turkey and supported by The Scientific and Techological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) constituted.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEFELİ, N., TAŞ, E. (2018). THE EFFECT OF MOBILE SCIENCE SCHOOL II PROJECT ON THE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE AND MOTIVATION. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 32, 1156–1170. https://ajindex.com/articles/339499

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akay, C. (2013). “Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Yaparak-Yaşayarak Öğrenmetemelli TÜBİTAK 4004 Bilim Okulu Projesi Sonrası Bilim Kavramına Yönelik Görüşleri” [The Opinions of the Secondary School Students Towards Science Concept Following TÜBİTAK 4004 Learning by Doing Summer Science School]. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2): 326-338.
  2. Altınok, H. (2005). “Cinsiyet ve Başarı Durumlarına Göre İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilgisi Dersine Yönelik Tutumları”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17: 81-91.
  3. Baxter, J. M., & Preece, P.F.W. (2000). “A Comparison of Dome and Computer Planetaria in The Teaching of Astronomy”. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1): 63-69. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635140050031046
  4. Bishop, J. E. (2003). Pre-college Astronomy Education in the United States in the Twentieth Century. In Heck A. (Ed.), Information Handling in Astronomy – Historical Vistas (pp.207-231).
  5. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  6. Bozdoğan, A.E. (2012). “The Practice of Prospective Science Teachers Regarding the Planning of Education Based Trips: Evaluation of Six Different Field Trips”. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(2): 1062-1069. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/246
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (18. Baskı) [Data Analysis Guidebook for Social Sciences (18th ed.)]. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11. Baskı) [Scientific Research Methods (11th ed.)]. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Crompton, J.L., & Sellar, C. (1981). “Do Outdoor Education Experiences Contribute to Positive Development in the Affective Domain?”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 12(4): 21-29. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1981.9942638
  10. Dede, Y., & Yaman, S. (2008). “Fen Öğrenmeye Yönelik Motivasyon Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması” [A Questionnaire for Motivation Toward Science Learning: A Validity and Reliability Study]. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1): 19-37. Retrieved from http://www.nef.balikesir.edu.tr/~dergi/makaleler/yayinda/4/EFMED_FBE106.pdf
  11. Doğru, M. & Kıyıcı, F. K. (2005). Fen Eğitiminin Zorunluluğu. M. Aydoğdu ve T. Kesercioğlu (Eds.), İlköğretim Fen ve Teknoloji Öğr