SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 32

MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR MODELLING OF NETWORK DESIGN TO IMPROVE REGIONAL AVITATION IN TURKEY: CASE OF ANADOLU UNIVERSITY

AYŞE KÜÇÜK YILMAZ
EBRU YAZGAN
Pages
1047–1065
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this research, we aimed make contribution to the social and economic development of both Turkey and Eskisehir via this inspiration work about regional aviation capacity and capabilities of Turkey via sample of Eskisehir AOE/Hasan Polatkan Airport.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The development of regional aviation sector has seized the momentum in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both the sound strategies and multi criteria decision-making processes are in needed to sustain the development of regional aviation in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this research, we aimed make contribution to the social and economic development of both Turkey and Eskisehir via this inspiration work about regional aviation capacity and capabilities of Turkey via sample of Eskisehir AOE/Hasan Polatkan Airport.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The development of regional aviation sector has seized the momentum in Turkey. In this process, using the limited resources correctly and transforming and implementing risk management decisions into effective time, cost and expense are the most critical elements of business management. Both the sound strategies and multi criteria decision-making processes are in needed to sustain the development of regional aviation in Turkey. Also decision making process should supported with enterprise risk management approach. To achieving corporate strategies requires implementation risk management based decision making process. The network design in airline management is a process in which decision makers consider many factors together with corporate strategy. The direct or indirect effects of these factors on each other also reveal their relations. Due to relations and interactions between criterions, benefit, opportunity cost and risk modules defined as BOCR criteria based on ANP methods will be used in this study. ANP is a multi-criteria decision making technique that take into consideration also qualitative factors in decision making problems. With concept of this method, it will be supported to literature reviews and receive opinions from executives in globally national and international industry. In this research, we aimed make contribution to the social and economic development of both Turkey and Eskisehir via this inspiration work about regional aviation capacity and capabilities of Turkey via sample of Eskisehir AOE/Hasan Polatkan Airport.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A. K., YAZGAN, E. (2018). MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR MODELLING OF NETWORK DESIGN TO IMPROVE REGIONAL AVITATION IN TURKEY: CASE OF ANADOLU UNIVERSITY. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 32, 1047–1065. https://ajindex.com/articles/339434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anadolu University, (2017). Hasan Polatkan Airport Management. Banger, G., & Çalışır, G. (2011). Yalın İş Modeli İnovasyonu. 7. KOBİ’ler ve Verimlilik Kongresi, 25 – 26 Ekim 2011,
  2. İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi İşletme Bölümü, 7. KOBİ’ler ve Verimlilik Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, İstanbul.
  3. Baynal K. and Yüzügüllü E. (2013). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Analitik Ağ Süreci ile Tedarikçi Seçimi ve Bir Uygulama, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), pp.77-92.
  4. Bitzan, J. and J. Peoples (2016). A comparative analysis of cost change for low-cost, full-service, and other carriers in the US airline industry, Research in Transportation Economics, 56, pp. 25-41.
  5. Bottero, M. and Ferretti, V.,(2011). An Analytic Network Process-based Approach for Location Problems: The case of a new waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy), Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 17, pp.63-84.
  6. Burghouwt, G., Hakfoort, J., and J. R. van Eck (2003). “The spatial configuration of airline networks in Europe”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 9, pp. 309-323. DOI: 10.1016/50969-6997(03)00039-5.
  7. Button, K.J., economic Taylor, S.Y., development. (2000). Journal International of Air air Transport transportation Management, and 6, pp. 209–222.
  8. Ceylanlar, A. (2016). Eskişehir'de Yabancı Turist Sayısının Arttırılmasına Yönelik Seyahat Acentelerinin Rolleri ve Çözüm Önerileri. Eskişehir: Researchgate. Çancı, M., & Güngören, M. (2013). İktisadi Yaşamda Taşımacılık Sektörü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(45), 198-213.
  9. Dağdeviren, M., Dönmez, N.and Kurt, M. (2006). Bir İşletmede Tedarikçi Değerlendirme Süreci İçin Yeni Bir Model Tasarımı ve Uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), pp.247-255.
  10. Dağdeviren M. and Yüksel İ. (2007). Personnel Selection Using Analytic Network Process, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Yıl: 6 Sayı: 11, pp.99–118.
  11. Dağdeviren, M. and Eraslan, E., (2008) “Priority Determination Of Strategic Energy Policies In Turkey Using Analytic Network Process (ANP) With Group Decision Making”, International Journal of Energy Research, 32, pp. 1047-1057.
  12. De Lotto, R., Gazzola, V., Gossenberg, S., Morelli di Popolo, C. and Venco, E.M. (2016). Proposal to Reduce Natural Risks: Analytic Network Process to Evaluate Efficiency of City Planning Strategies, Springer: Cham, Switzerland, pp. 650–664.
  13. Dobruszkes, F., Moshe Givoni and Timothy Vowles. (2017). Hello