Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34

STUDY ON MOBBING BEHAVIORS EXPERIENCED BY TEACHERS

Pages
2218–2238
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to prevent mobbing behaviors at schools, administration should be merit-based, the administrators should receive in-service training for management of human relations and they should be aware of the legal rights of the teachers under such circumstances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is intended for identification of mobbing behaviors that teachers experience at schools, the underlying reasons for mobbing, their consequences and persons imposing mobbing and for introduction of solutions in line with teachers’ opinions in order to avoid mobbing behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is a case study that addresses case- specific factors in qualitative research by means of an integrated approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to prevent mobbing behaviors at schools, administration should be merit-based, the administrators should receive in-service training for management of human relations and they should be aware of the legal rights of the teachers under such circumstances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study is intended for identification of mobbing behaviors that teachers experience at schools, the underlying reasons for mobbing, their consequences and persons imposing mobbing and for introduction of solutions in line with teachers’ opinions in order to avoid mobbing behaviors. This study is a case study that addresses case- specific factors in qualitative research by means of an integrated approach. The study group is composed of 37 teachers that worked in Kilis during the 2013-2014 school year. During the research, a semi-structured interview method has been adopted among others. Descriptive, content and frequency analysis methods have been applied for data analysis. ATLAS.ti 6 package programme has been used for data analysis. Based on the comments from teachers, the most common mobbing behaviors inflicted upon them at schools are: disregarding ideas and opinions, talking behind someone’s back, interrupting and ignoring him/her usually. It has been determined that school administrators are the most common persons imposing mobbing. Meanwhile, the impact of mobbing on teachers is: reduced commitment to the school, unhappiness, lack of confidence in the school and depression. Throughout the research, it has been revealed that the underlying reasons for demonstrating mobbing behaviors are: the administrator’s concern for losing his/her authority, his/her ambition for acknowledgement of his/her demands and the political and union factions at the school. In order to prevent mobbing behaviors at schools, administration should be merit-based, the administrators should receive in-service training for management of human relations and they should be aware of the legal rights of the teachers under such circumstances.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZBAYINDIR, F., EKEN, M. (2018). STUDY ON MOBBING BEHAVIORS EXPERIENCED BY TEACHERS. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34, 2218–2238. https://ajindex.com/articles/339247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abay, A. (2009). İlköğretim Okullarında Çalışan Öğretmenlerin Psikolojik Şiddet Algıları İle Sosyal Destek Algıları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Maltepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  2. Ağaoğlu, E., Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K., & Karaköse, T. (2012). Okul Yöneticilerinin Yeterliklerine İlişkin Okul Yöneticilerinin ve Öğretmenlerin Görüşleri (Kütahya ili). Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 159-175.
  3. Akman, Ö., Kılıç Çarşanbalı Ç. & Alagöz, B. (2017). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenlerinin Değer Eğitiminde Örtük Programa Yönelik Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 18 (1), 701-720.
  4. Ariza-Montes, A., Muniz, N. M., Montero-Simó, M. J., & Araque-Padilla, R. A. (2013). Work Place Bullying Among Health Care Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health, 10(8), 3121-3139.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10083121. Aydoğan, Z. (2010). Okullarda Öğretmen-Yönetici İlişkilerinde Yıldırma (Mobbing) ve Etkileri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul Akgeyik, T., Delen Güngör, M. &Uşen, Ş. (2013). Çalışma Yaşamında Psikolojik Taciz Ankara: T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Eğitim ve Araştırma Merkezi. Alkan, E. (2011). Yıldırma (Mobbing) Davranışlarının Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenlerinin Tükenmişliği Üzerine Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Balıkesir. Altuntaş, C. (2010). Mobbing Kavramı ve Örnekleri Üzerine Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma. Journal of Yaşar University, 5 (18), 2995-3015.
  5. Alparslan, A.M. & Tunç, H. (2009). Mobbing Olgusu ve Mobbing Davranışında Duygusal Zekâ Etkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 146-159.
  6. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007a). Okul Yöneticilerinin Liderlik Stilleri ile Yıldırma Arasındaki İlişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 77-87.
  7. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007b). The Exposure of Primary School Teachers to Bullying: an Analysis of Various Variables. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(6), 789-802.
  8. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007c). Örgütlerin Kaçınılmaz Sorunu: Yıldırma. Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 42, 111-126
  9. Cemaloğlu, N. & Ertürk, A. (2007). Öğretmenlerin Maruz Kaldıkları Yıldırma Eylemlerinin Cinsiyet Yönünden İncelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 345-362.
  10. Cemaloğlu, N.& Okçu, V. (2012). İlköğretim Okulu Yöneticilerinin Liderlik Stilleri İle Öğretm