Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 38

A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ EMOTIONAL LABOR BEHAVIOR

Pages
1141–1156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that teachers expressed their feelings in different ways according to the situation they’re in or depending on the person that they’re communicating with (student, teacher, parent).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine teachers’ views on emotional labor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research’s study group used phenomenological design which is one of the qualitative research designs and composed of 15 teachers who work at primary schools in Gaziantep in the 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that teachers expressed their feelings in different ways according to the situation they’re in or depending on the person that they’re communicating with (student, teacher, parent).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The purpose of this study is to examine teachers’ views on emotional labor. The research’s study group used phenomenological design which is one of the qualitative research designs and composed of 15 teachers who work at primary schools in Gaziantep in the 2017-2018 academic year. Data was collected through semi-structured interview forms. Descriptive analysis and content analysis were used in the analysis of the data and the interrater level of agreement based on the ratings of researchers was calculated as 0.91. As a result of the research, it was determined that teachers displayed emotional labor behaviors at schools. The views of teachers on emotional labor are grouped under three sub-themes; “surface acting”, “deep acting“ and “natural emotions”. In the surface acting sub-theme, teacher views are as follows: reflecting emotions by managing them, displaying different emotions based on the circumstances and displaying superficial emotions. The views on the deep acting sub-theme are expressed in the following order: demonstrating extra effort while displaying emotions, not reflecting the negative emotions (anxiety, fear, etc.) and hiding the true emotions. For the natural emotions sub-theme, teachers expressed the following views: assuming a calm attitude and displaying genuine (natural) emotions. It was concluded that teachers expressed their feelings in different ways according to the situation they’re in or depending on the person that they’re communicating with (student, teacher, parent). It was also determined that they engaged more in deep acting, which requires an extra effort in displaying emotions, and also in displaying natural emotions, where the emotions that are felt are displayed naturally (genuinely) with no need for any extra effort. Teachers can be provided with training on management of emotions so that they can accurately express their feelings and reflect their emotions by managing them based on the situation that they are in.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALEV, S. (2019). A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ EMOTIONAL LABOR BEHAVIOR. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 38, 1141–1156. https://ajindex.com/articles/339204

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alev, S. (2018). Öğretmenlerin Genel Öz Yeterlilik Algıları Ile Duygusal Emek Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: İzlenim Yönetimi Taktiklerinin Aracılık Rolü. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gaziantep. Argon, T. (2015). “Öğretmenlerin Sahip Oldukları Duygu Durumlarını Okul Yöneticilerinin Dikkate Alıp Almamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri.” Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1): 377-404.
  2. Ashforth, B. E., & Humprey, R. H. (1993). “Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity.” Academy and Management Journal, 18: 88-115.
  3. Basım, H. N., Begenirbaş, M., & Yalçın, R. C. (2013). “Öğretmenlerde Kişilik Özelliklerinin Duygusal Tükenmeye Etkisi: Duygusal Emeğin Aracılık Rolü.” Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3): 1488-1496.
  4. Begenirbaş, M., & Yalçın, R. C. (2012). “Öğretmenlerin Kişilik Özelliklerinin Duygusal Emek Gösterimlerine Etkileri.” Cag University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1): 47-66.
  5. Bıyık, Y. (2014). Duygusal Emek ile Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İlişkisi: Bir Araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  6. Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). “Emotional Labor and Burnout: Comparing Two Perspectives of “People Work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1): 17-39.
  7. Brown, E. L., Horner, C. G., Kerr, M. M., & Scanlon, C. L. (2014). “United States Teachers' Emotional Labor and Professional Identities.” KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 11(2): 205-225. Brotheridge C.M., & Lee R. T. (2003). “Development and Validation of the Emotional Labor Scale.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76: 365-379. Cheung F. Y., & Tang, C. S. (2010). “Effects of Age, Gender, and Emotional Labor Strategies on Job Outcomes: Moderated Mediation Analyses.” Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(3): 323-339.
  8. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Analiz. Çev. Ed., A. Aypay. Ankara:
  9. Anı Yayıncılık. Creswell, J. V. (2016). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma ve Araştırma Deseni. Çev. Ed., M. Bütün, & S. B. Demir. Ankara:
  10. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  11. Cribbs, A. J. (2015). Emotional Labor and Conflict in Schools: Teacher Perceptions of the Emotional Display Rules Necessary for Negative Teacher-Student Interactions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures,