Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 40

INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP IN TURKEY: AN EXAMINATION ON THE VALIDITY OF PHILLIPS CURVE (1988-2017)

Pages
572–588
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ordinary least squares estimation method and Johansen cointegration test results indicate that there is a relationship between inflation and unemployment and Phillips Curve is valid in Turkey during the period 1988-2017.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It makes important contributions to economics literature Phillips Curve explaining the interaction between rate of change in monetary wages and unemployment rate firstly appeared in 1958.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It explains relationship between inflation rate and unemployment rate Phillips Curve which has been handled differently since and after 1960.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ordinary least squares estimation method and Johansen cointegration test results indicate that there is a relationship between inflation and unemployment and Phillips Curve is valid in Turkey during the period 1988-2017.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

It makes important contributions to economics literature Phillips Curve explaining the interaction between rate of change in monetary wages and unemployment rate firstly appeared in 1958. It explains relationship between inflation rate and unemployment rate Phillips Curve which has been handled differently since and after 1960. This study aims to examine inflation-unemployment relationship and the validity of Phillips Curve in Turkey. In this context, the data set used for econometric application is annual and covers the period 1988-2017. Econometric methods are used as ordinary least squares estimation and Johansen cointegration test in the study. Ordinary least squares estimation method and Johansen cointegration test results indicate that there is a relationship between inflation and unemployment and Phillips Curve is valid in Turkey during the period 1988-2017. Johansen cointegration test results show that there is a long-run relationship such as unemployment rate, inflation rate, unit value index of export goods, unit value index of imported goods and broadly defined monetary growth variables. Thus, it is thought to be useful the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey of the policies implementation taking into account the existence of this relationship between inflation and unemployment in the context of ensuring and sustaining price stability in the next process.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATGÜR, M. (2020). INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP IN TURKEY: AN EXAMINATION ON THE VALIDITY OF PHILLIPS CURVE (1988-2017). Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 40, 572–588. https://ajindex.com/articles/339188

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Atkeson, A. & Ohanian, L. E. (2001). "Are Phillips Curves Useful for Forecasting Inflation?". FRB Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 2-11.
  2. Aurelijus, D. & Kulikov, D. (2007). New Keynesian Phillips curve for Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Working Papers of Eesti Pank. No 7/2007.
  3. Bayrak, M & Kanca, O. C. (2013). "Türkiye’de Phillips Eğrisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama". Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(3): 97- 115. Céspedes, L. F., Ochoa, M. & Soto, C. (2005). The New Keynesian Phillips Curve in an Emerging Market Economy: The Case of Chile. Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 355, Central Bank of Chile. Chowdhury, K. B. & Sarkar, N. (2014). Is the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve Stable? Evidence from Some Emerging Economies. Discussion Paper ERU/2014 – 02 Çevik, F. S. (2005). “Beklentilerin Rolü ve Phillips Eğrisi”. Mevzuat Dergisi, 95: 1-11.
  4. Esu, G. & Atan, J. (2017). The Phillip's Curve in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis, MPRA Paper No. 82112. Friedman, M. (1968). “The Role of Monetary Policy”. American Economic Review, 58: 1-17.
  5. Furuoka, F. (2007). "Does the Phillips Curve Really Exist? New Empirical Evidence from Malaysia". Economics Bulletin, 5: 1-14.
  6. Gagnon, J. E. & Collins, C. G. (2019). Low Inflation Bends the Phillips Curve. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper. Hall, T. E. & Hart, W. R. (2010). The Samuelson - Solow "Phillips Curve" and the Great Inflation. Miami University, Farmer School of Business Department of Economics Working Paper 2010-08.
  7. Hetzel, R. L. (2013). "The Monetarist-Keynesyen Debate and the Phillips Curve: Lessons from the Great Inflation". Economic Quarterly, 2(99): 83-116.
  8. Humphrey, T. M. (1985). "The Evolution and Policy Implications of Phillips Curve Analysis". Economic Review, March/April, 3-22.
  9. Johansen, S. (1988). "Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors". Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2–3(12): 231–254.
  10. Johansen, S. (1991). "Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models". Econometrica, 6(59): 1551–1580.
  11. Karahan, P. & Uslu, N. Ç. (2018). "A Dynamic Analysis on the Validity of the Phillips Curve for Turkey". Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 636(55): 89-99.
  12. Kustepeli, Y. (2005). "A Comprehensive Short-run Analysis of a (Possible) Turkish Phillips Curve". Applied Economics, 37: 581–91.
  13. Lucas, R. E. (1976). "Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique". Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, 1: 19