Journals / Yunus Araştırma Bülteni / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Effect Of First Stocking Size On Growth Performance and Feed Intake OfTilapia Hybridization

İlk Stok Boyunun Kışlatılmış Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Değerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
57–65
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, mixed groups either hybrids, or nile tilapia groups were made better growth rate and FCR than the other groups (graded groups).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, effects of first stocking size and size grading on growth of nile tilapia and their hybrids (Oreochromis niloticus female x Oreochromis aureus male) were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A decision has been made on which stocking system has been more effective on which size grading of stocking, starting the stocking with different size grading compositions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, mixed groups either hybrids, or nile tilapia groups were made better growth rate and FCR than the other groups (graded groups).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, effects of first stocking size and size grading on growth of nile tilapia and their hybrids (Oreochromis niloticus female x Oreochromis aureus male) were investigated. A decision has been made on which stocking system has been more effective on which size grading of stocking, starting the stocking with different size grading compositions. In another dimension of the study; it's been researched that in what amount would this situation effects when individual with variable weights are placed randomly compared to placements with either only small or large. At the end of the research hybrids were higher growth value than nile tilapia. Furthermore, mixed groups either hybrids, or nile tilapia groups were made better growth rate and FCR than the other groups (graded groups).

Özet

Bu çalışmada nil tilapiaları ve onların melezlerinde (Oreochromis niloticus dişi x Oreochromis aureus erkek) ilk stok ağırlığının ve boylamanın büyümeye ve yem değerlendirmeye olan etkileri araştırılmış ve farklı boy kompozisyonları ile stoklamaya başlanarak ve hangi boyda stoklamanın hangi grupta daha verimli olduğu konusunda bir fikir oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmanın bir diğer boyutunda ise farklı ağırlıklara sahip bireyler karışık olarak yetiştirildiklerinde yalnız küçük ya da sadece büyük boyda yetiştirilenlere oranla ne ölçüde bu durumdan etkilenecekleri araştırılmıştır. Denemede küçük melez yavruların büyüklere oranla daha iyi büyüdüğü, kışlatılmış gruplarda hem nil tilapialarında hem de melezlerde karışık grupların daha iyi büyüme ve yem değerlendirme oranlarına ulaştığı saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DIKEL, S., ÖZŞAHİNOĞLU, I., MUMOĞULLARINDA, P., TELLİOĞLU, F. S., ÖZ, M. (2014). Effect Of First Stocking Size On Growth Performance and Feed Intake OfTilapia Hybridization. Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 57–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/337707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Kaynaklar: Baardvik, B.M. ve Jobling, M. 1990. Effect of Size- sorting on Biomass Gain and Individual Growth Rates in Arctic Charr, Salvelinus alpinus L., Aquaculture, 90: 11–16. Brown, M.E. 1946. The Growth of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta Linn.). I. Factors Influencing The Growth of Trout Fry, Journal of Experimental Biology, 22: 118-129.
  2. Company, R., Calduch-Giner, J.A., Perez-Sanchez, J. ve Kaushik,S.1999. Protein sparing effect of dietary in common dentex (Dentex dentex): a compa- rative study with sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 2330. Dikel, S. 1997. Effect of Different Stocking Densities on Growth of Hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus x Oreochromis niloticus) in Cages Standing in Concrete Ponds. Turkish journal of Veterinary and Animal Scienses. Vol 21, (3):247-250.
  3. Dikel, S. 2009. Tilapia Yetiştiriciliği. T.C. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Üretim Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.
  4. ANKARA. Eknath, A.E., Tayamen M.M., Paladade Vera M.S., Danting J.C., Reyes R.A., Dionisio E.E., Capili J.B., Bolivar H.L., Abella T.A., Circa A.C., Bentsen, H.B., Gjerde, B., Gjedrem T. ve Pullin R.S.V. 1993. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapia: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environment. Aquaculture111,171-188.
  5. Fitzsimmons, K., Ramotar, P., Cerozi, B. ve Anday, T. 2013. Tilapia Production And Market Situation In 2013 World Aquaculture Society: Aquaculture 2013 - Nashville, Tennessee February 21-25.
  6. Goldan, O. Popper, D. Kolkovski, S. ve Karplus, I. 1998. Management of Size Variation in Juvenile Gilthead Sea bream (Sparus aurata): II. Dry Food Type and Live/Dry Food Ratio, Aquaculture, 165: 313-320.
  7. Gunnes, K. 1976. Effect of Size Grading Yong Atlantic salmon Salmo salar on Subsequent Growth, Aquaculture, 9: 381-386.
  8. Hargreaves, A.J. 1987. Feeding Practices for Caged Blue Tilapia.Virgin Island Perspective Agricultural Research Notes (Eclitted by Carol B. Fleming) Summer Fall 1987 Vol.2 No.2. Jobling, M. 1985. Physiological and Social Constraints on Growth of Fish with Special Reference to Arctic Charr, Salvelinus alpinus L., Aquaculture, 44: 8390. Jobling, M. 1995. Simple Indices for the Assessment of the Influences of Social Environment on Growth Performance, Exemplified by Studies on Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus), Aquaculture Inter- national, 3: 60-65.
  9. Knights, B. 1983. Food Particle-size Preferences and Feeding Behavior in Warm Water Aquacu