Journals / Yeni Üroloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Our experience with mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients

Pediatrik hastalarda mini perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimlerimiz

Pages
11–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Mini-PCNL for pediatric kidney stones can be performed with higher success rates and low complications due to carefully selected cases and clinical experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of pediatric mini-percutaneus nephrolitotomy (Mini-PCNL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The data of pediatric patients (<16 years) with kidney stones between June 2009 and January 2016 had been retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Mini-PCNL for pediatric kidney stones can be performed with higher success rates and low complications due to carefully selected cases and clinical experience.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 · 0.83 adet
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of pediatric mini-percutaneus nephrolitotomy (Mini-PCNL). Material and Methods: The data of pediatric patients (<16 years) with kidney stones between June 2009 and January 2016 had been retrospectively reviewed. All patients were selected for Mini-PCNL according to European Association of Urology guidelines. The final treatment modality was decided with parents or heir-at-law. All patients were evaluated with noncontrast computerized tomography, kidney-ureter-bladder x-ray and/or ultrasonograpy prior to treatment. Results: A total of 60 patients (20 females, 40 males) with a mean age 9.3±4.53 (range;1-16) has been evaluated. The mean number of stones were 1.4±0.83 adet (1-5) and 28 of the stones were in right kidney and 32 of the stones were in left kidney. The mean stone-burden was 394.8±223.4 (range; 143-1350) mm2. The preoperative mean BUN, creatinine, hematocrite levels were 22.7±6.2 (12-39) mg/dL, 0.74±0.37 (0.3-3) mg/dL, % 35.42±2.64 (29-40), respectively. The mean flouroscopy time was 116.3±45.4 (40-234) seconds.The success rate was found 91.7 %. The minor and major complication rate were 11.6 %, 1.6 % respectively. Conclusion: The Mini-PCNL for pediatric kidney stones can be performed with higher success rates and low complications due to carefully selected cases and clinical experience.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde böbrek taşı sebebi ile Mini-perkütan nefrolitotomi (Mini-PCNL) yaptığımız pediatrik yaş grubundaki hastaların değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Haziran 2009 ve Ocak 2016 tarihleri arasında kliğimizde böbrek taşı sebebi ile Mini- PCNL yaptığımız pediatrik yaş grubundaki (<16 yaş) hastaların dosyaları ve bilgisayar kayıtları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların tamamına Mini-PCNL endikasyonu Avrupa Üroloji Birliği kılavuzunda belirtilen kriterlere göre konulmuştu. Hastalara yapılacak tedavinin tipi doktor-hasta, yasal vasisi görüşmesi sonucuna göre kararlaştırılmıştı. Hastalar öncelikle DÜSG ve/veya ultrasonografi (USG) ile değerlendirildikten sonra, tüm hastalara kontrastsız bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) tetkiki yapılmıştı. Bulgular: Çalışmamız, ortalama yaşı 9.3±4.53 (1-16) olan 20'si kız, 40'ı erkek toplam 60 hastadan oluşmaktaydı. Hastaların ortalama taş sayısı 1.4±0.83 adet (1-5) iken bu taşların 28'i sağ, 32'si sol böbrekte bulunmaktaydı. Ortalama taş yükü ise 394.8±223.4 mm2 (143-1350) olarak hesaplandı.Hastaların preoperatif üre, kreatinin, hematokrit değerleri sırası ile 22.7±6.2 (12-39) mg/dL, 0.74±0.37 (0.3-3) mg/dL, % 35.42±2.64 (29-40) idi. Bu değerler postoperatif sırasıyla 21.7±3.7 (14-31 ) mg/dL, 0.7±0.2 (0.4- 1.1) mg/dL, % 31.6±3 (26-39) olarak bulundu. Ortalama skopi süresi 116.3±45.4 saniye (40- 234) olarak bulundu. Başarı oranımız %91.7 olarak bulundu. Minör ve majör komplikasyon oranlarımız sırasıyla %11.6 , % 1.6 idi. Sonuç: Çocukluk çağı böbrek taş hastalığı- nın tedavisinde Mini-PCNL'de uygun hasta se- çimi ve klinik tecrübenin artmasına bağlı olarak yüksek başarı, düşük komplikasyon oranları ile güvenle yapılabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, H. U., ERÇİL, H., ORTOĞLU, F., ALMA, E., CEBER, S., DEMİRCİ, D. A., EVLİYAOĞLU, Y. K., GÜRBÜZ, Z. G. (2017). Our experience with mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 11–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/337171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ost MC, Schneck FX.Peadiatric urology; peadiatric stone dissease treatment. Campbell’sUrology.Wein AJ, Kavous- siLR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 2012; p: 3667-3684
  2. Hulbert JC, Reddy PK, Gonzales R, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An alternative approach to the manage- ment of pediatric calculus disease. Pediatrics 1985;76: 610- 14
  3. Dwyer ME, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Temporalt- rends in incidence of kidney stones among children: a 25- year population based study. J Urol 2012;188:247-52
  4. Newman DM, Coury T, Lingeman JE, et al. Extracorpo- real shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol 1986;136:238-40
  5. Kroovand RL. Pediatric urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:173
  6. Ganpule AP, Mishra S, Desai MR. Percutaneous neph- rolithotomy for pediatric urolithiasis. Indian J Urol 2010;26:549-54
  7. Puppo P. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Curr OpinUrol 1999;9:325-8
  8. Woodside JR, Stevens GF, Stark GL, et al. Percutaneous sto- ne removal in children. J Urol 1985;134:1166-7
  9. Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 1997;11:171-2
  10. Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 1998;16:371-4
  11. Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG. Per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experienc ewith a new technique. Urology 1998;52:697-701
  12. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al; AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treat- ment recom-mendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000
  13. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K: Guidelines on urolit- hiasis. European Association of Urology 2014 http://www. uroweb.org/publications/eau-guidelines 14. Badawy AA, Saleem MD, AbolyosrA, et al. Extra corpore- al shock wave lithotripsy as firstline treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:661–6
  14. Penn HA, DeMarco RT, Sherman AK, Gatti JM, Murphy JP.Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi. J Urol 2009;182:1824–7
  15. Boormans JL, Scheepe JR, Verkoelen CF, VerhagenPC. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating renal calculi in children. BJU Int 2005;95:631-4
  16. Nouralizadeh A, Basiri A, Javaherforooshzadeh A,