Journals / Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

İş Güvencesi Endeksi ve İş Güvencesi Memnuniyeti Ölçeği: Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Analizi

Pages
23–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is believed that the short and easily understandable Job Security Index and Job Security Satisfaction scales that are shown to be reliable and valid can be useful to this end.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a growing interest in job security in the past two decades characterized by increased attempts at corporate restructurings and changes in work processes and the labor market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study presents reliability and validity analyses of two scales (Job Security Index and Job Security Satisfaction scale) developed by Probst (1998).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is believed that the short and easily understandable Job Security Index and Job Security Satisfaction scales that are shown to be reliable and valid can be useful to this end.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in job security in the past two decades characterized by increased attempts at corporate restructurings and changes in work processes and the labor market. During this period researchers have focused on defining the job security construct and developing instruments for measuring it. This study presents reliability and validity analyses of two scales (Job Security Index and Job Security Satisfaction scale) developed by Probst (1998). The findings of the study support the reliability and validity of these two scales in Turkish. Layoffs that have intensified since the recent financial crisis render research on job security important in the Turkish context. It is believed that the short and easily understandable Job Security Index and Job Security Satisfaction scales that are shown to be reliable and valid can be useful to this end.

Özet

İş güvencesi konusu şirketlerin yeniden yapılanma çabalarının yoğunlaştığı, çalışma süreçlerinde ve iş gücü piyasasında önemli değişikliklerin gerçekleştiği son yirmi yıl boyunca artan bir ilgi görmüştür. Bu dönemde araştırmacılar iş güvencesi kavramının geliştirilmesi ve bu kavramın ölçülmesi için gerekli araçların yaratılması üzerinde yoğunlaşmıştır. Bu çalışmada Probst'un (1998) geliştirdiği iki ölçeğin (İş Güvencesi Endeksi ve İş Güvencesi Memnuniyeti ölçeği) güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi sunulmaktadır. Çalışmanın bulguları bu ölçeklerin Türkçe'de güvenirlik ve geçerliklerini desteklemektedir. Özellikle yakın dönemdeki mali kriz nedeniyle işten çıkarmaların yoğunlaştığı Türkiye'de iş güvencesi çalışmaları önem kazanmıştır. Geçerlik ve güvenirliğe sahip olduğu gösterilen, kısa ve anlaşılır olan İş Güvencesi Endeksi ve İş Güvencesi Memnuniyeti ölçeği bu çalışmalara katkıda bulunabilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONDER, C., WASTI, S. A. (2002). İş Güvencesi Endeksi ve İş Güvencesi Memnuniyeti Ölçeği: Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Analizi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 23–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/336552

References (12)

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. ve Wothke, W. 1999. AMOS 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation. Arnold, H. J. ve Feldman D. C. 1982. A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 350-360.
  2. Ashford, S. J., Lee, C. ve Bobko, P. 1989. Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 803-829.
  3. Bacon, N. ve Blyton P. 2001. High involvement work systems and job insecurity in the international iron and steel industry. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18: 5-16.
  4. Bolt, J. F. 1983. Job security: Its time has come. Harvard Business Review, 61: 115-123.
  5. Borg, I. ve Elizur, D. 1992. Job insecurity: Correlates, moderators and measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 13: 13-26.
  6. Burke, R. J. 1992. Job insecurity in stockbrokers: Effects on satisfaction and health. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 6: 10-16.
  7. Caplan, R.D., Cobb, S., French, J.R.P., Jr., Van Harrison, R.V. ve Pinneau, S.R., Jr. 1975. Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Cappelli, P. 1999. The new deal at work: Managing the market-driven workforce. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  8. De Witte, H. 1999. Job insecurity and psychological well-being: Review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8: 155-177.
  9. Ecevit, Y. 1995. The status and changing forms of women’s labour in the urban economy. Ş. Tekeli (Der.), Women in modern Turkey: A reader: 81-88. London: Zed Books. Greenhalgh, L., ve Rosenblatt, Z. 1984. Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9: 438- 448. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. C. 1995. Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Harrison, R. 1961. Cumulative communality cluster analysis of workers’ job attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45: 123-125.
  10. Hellgren, J., Sverke, M. ve Isaksson, K. 1999. A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity: Consequences for employee attitudes and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 8: 179-195.
  11. Iverson, R. D. ve Roy, P. 1994. A causal model of behavioral commitment: Evidence from a study of of Australian blue-collar employees. Journal of Management, 20: 15-41.
  12. Jacobson, D. 1987. Personological study of the job insecurity experience