SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

In Vitro Investigation of the Effect of Different Irrigation Systems Connection Strenght of the Canal Filling Material to the Root Canal

Farklı Yıkama Sistemlerinin, Kanal Dolgu Materyalinin Kök Kanalına Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Olan Etkisinin İn-Vitro Olarak İncelenmesi

ESİN ÖZLEK
Mert GÖKAY EROĞLU
Pages
252–258
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: EndoVac irrigation system is presented significantly superior to other systems in connection strength of the canal root filling material to the root canal

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Aim of our study is to investigate whether using different irrigation systems (EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA, ABD), EndoActivator (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) and Endo-Eze (Ultradent Product, South Jordan, UT, USA) irrigation tip) induces connection strength or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 45 properly chosen extracted and standard teeth were used in our study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: EndoVac irrigation system is presented significantly superior to other systems in connection strength of the canal root filling material to the root canal
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Aim of our study is to investigate whether using different irrigation systems (EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA, ABD), EndoActivator (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) and Endo-Eze (Ultradent Product, South Jordan, UT, USA) irrigation tip) induces connection strength or not. Material and Method: 45 properly chosen extracted and standard teeth were used in our study. Instrumentation performed using Protaper Next (Ni-Ti) files (Dentsply Maillefer, Balaigues, Switzerland) in crown-down technique. Irrigation of teeth is performed using EndoEze irrigation tips with 1 ml NaOCl with 5.25% of concentration during instrumentation and separated into 3 groups in final irrigation unlike the first stage. Irrigation performed of NaOCl with 5.25% and of EDTA with 17% concentration using EndoVac, EndoActivator and Endo-Eze respectively. Subsequently, obturation is performed properly to single-cone technique using AH-Plus Jet canal sealer and Protaper Next gutta-percha. Samples, consisting of 1 mm wide horizontal sections are connected to Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Push-out force is applied till the observation of fail in canal filling to dentine connection and these values are saved in Newton unit. As push-out connection strength values obtained in the study showed normal distribution, One way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc tests are used to determine the difference between groups (p=0.05). Results: According to statistical results, it is determined that samples in the group using EndoVac irrigation system showed higher connection strength. Conclusion: EndoVac irrigation system is presented significantly superior to other systems in connection strength of the canal root filling material to the root canal

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı dişlerin şekillendirilmesi ve genişletmesi sırasında farklı yıkama sistemlerinin (EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA, ABD), EndoActivator (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) ve Endo-Eze (Ultradent Product, South Jordan, UT, USA) yıkama ucunun) kullanılmasının, kanal patının bağlanma dayanımını artırıp artırmadığını araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda standartlara uygun olarak seçilmiş 45 diş kullanılmıştır. Kanallar ProTaper Next nikel titanyum (Ni-Ti) kanal aletleri (Dentsply Maillefer, Balaigues, İsviçre) kullanılarak crown-down tekniği ile şekillendirilmiştir. Dişlerin irrigasyonu şekillendirme ve genişletme sırasında 1 ml %5.25 NaOCI kullanılarak EndoEze yıkama ucuyla yapılmış olup son irrigasyon işleminde gruplara ayrılmıştır. Gruplarda sırayla EndoVac, EndoActıvator ve EndoEze yıkama ucu kullanılarak %5.25 NaOCI ve %17'lik EDTA ile irrigasyon yapılmıştır. Daha sonra kanallar AH Plus jet kanal patı ve Protaper Next güta-perka kullanılarak tek kon tekniğine uygun olarak doldurulmuştur. 1 mm horizontal kesitler elde edilen örnekler, Shimadzu Universal Test Cihazına (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) bağlanmıştır. Push-out kuvveti, kanal dolgusunun dentine bağlantısında başarısızlık oluşana kadar uygulanmış ve elde edilen değerler Newton olarak kaydedilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen push-out bağlanma dayanım değerleri normal dağılım gösterdiği için aralarındaki farklılığın tespiti için tek yönlü varyans analizi ANOVA testi, gruplar arası farkın tespiti için Tukey's Post Hoc testi (p=0.05) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Yapılan istatiksel analiz sonucu EndoVac cihazının kullanıldığı grubun daha yüksek bağlanma dayanımı gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: EndoVac yıkama sistemi kök kanal dolgu materyalinin dentin bağlantısı açısından diğer sistemlere göre üstün bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZLEK, E., EROĞLU, M. G. (2016). In Vitro Investigation of the Effect of Different Irrigation Systems Connection Strenght of the Canal Filling Material to the Root Canal. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 252–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/334533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bayırlı G. Endodontik Tedavi. Ü Basımevi, İstanbul, 1991.
  2. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35(6): 791-804.
  3. Buck R, Eleazer PD, Staat RH. In Vitro Disinfection of Dentinal Tubules by Various Endodontics Irrigants. Journal of Endodontics 1999; 25(12): 786-788. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30(8): 559-567. mechanical and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces. Endodontic Topics 2005; 10: 103- 122. Svec TA, Harrison JW. Chemomechanical removal of pulpal and dentinal debris with sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide vs normal saline solution. J Endod 1977; 3(2): 49- 53. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a rewiew. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics 2002; 94(6): 658-666. Wu MK, de Schwartz FB, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. The quality of root fillings remaining in mandibular incisors after root-end cavity preparation. Int Endod J 2001; 34(8): 613- 619. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32(5): 389-398. Rath Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol 1977; 44(2):306-312.
  4. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35(6): 791-804.
  5. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems. J Endod 2009; 35(4): 545-549.
  6. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, et al. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. International Endodontic Journal 2006; 39 (10): 809-818.
  7. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 1987; 13(4): 147- 157. Liolios E, Economides N, Parissis-Messimeris S, Boutsioukis A. The effectiveness of three irrigating solutions on root canal cleaning after hand and mechanical preparation. Int Endod J 1997; 30(1): 51-57.
  8. Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossù M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007; 35(11): 827-835.
  9. Drummond JL, Sakaguchi RL, Racean DC, Wozny J, Steinberg AD. Testing mode and surface treatment effects on dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 32(4): 533-541.
  10. Gesi A, Raffaelli O, Goracci C,