Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Calcium Hydroxide Removal Efficiency of Different Concentrations and Forms of Sodium Hypochlorite

Pages
543–549
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Chi-square test was used for making comparisons among the groups at a significance level of p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to compare different forms of sodium hypochlorite for the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared using ProTaper Next file up to size X3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Chi-square test was used for making comparisons among the groups at a significance level of p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare different forms of sodium hypochlorite for the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals. Sixty single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared using ProTaper Next file up to size X3. Each root canal was filled with calcium hydroxide using #30 Lentulo (Dentsply, Mailifer, Switzerland) to the working length and stored in 100% humidity at 37 C for 7 days. Afterwards, the teeth were divided into 4 groups according to the irrigation protocol to be used for the removal of calcium hydroxide (n=10): Group 1, 2.5% NaOCI; Group 2, 5.25% NaOCI; Group 3, NaOCI gel; Group 4, Distilled water (control). Samples were split longitudinally, photos of halves were taken at 10× magnification and were analyzed using the Corel DRAW Graphics Suite X4 v14.0 (Corel Corporation. CA, USA) software to calculate the percentage of surfaces with residual calcium hydroxide. Chi-square test was used for making comparisons among the groups at a significance level of p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZLEK, E., KADI, G. (2022). Evaluation of Calcium Hydroxide Removal Efficiency of Different Concentrations and Forms of Sodium Hypochlorite. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 543–549. https://ajindex.com/articles/494848

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Möller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, Happonen RP. Apical periodontitis development and bacterial response to endodontic treatment. Experimental root canal infections in monkeys with selected bacterial strains. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 207-15. 2. de Oliveira RL, Guerisoli DMZ, Duque JA, et al. Computed microtomography evaluation of calcium hydroxide-based root canal dressing removal from oval root canals by different methods of irrigation. Microsc Res Tech 2019; 82: 232-237
  2. Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Burklein S, Schafer E. Removal of Calcium Hydroxide from Artificial Grooves in Straight Root Canals: Sonic Activation Using EDDY Versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and XPendo Finisher. J Endod 2019; 45(3): 322-326
  3. Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study. J Endod 2006; 32: 1097-101
  4. Zorzin J, Wießner J, Wießner T, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Ebert J. Removal of Radioactively Marked Calcium Hydroxide from the Root Canal: Influence of Volume of Irrigation and Activation. J Endod 2016; 42(4): 637-640
  5. Ok E, Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Capar ID. Effectiveness of different irrigation protocols on calcium hydroxide removal from simulated immature teeth after apexification. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2015; 1: 1-5
  6. Wang Y, Guo LY, Fang HZ, et al. An in vitro study on the efficacy of removing calcium hydroxide from curved root canal systems in root canal therapy. Int J Oral Sci 2017; 9: 110- 116
  7. Lambrianidis T, Kosti E, Boutsioukis C, Mazinis M. Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine medicaments from the root canal. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 55- 61
  8. Faria G, Viola KS, Coaguila-Llerena H, et al. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into root canal dentine: effect of surfactants, gel form and passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 385-392
  9. Pontes F, Pontes H, Adachi P, Rodini C, Almeida D, Pinto D, Jr. Gingival and bone necrosis caused by accidental sodium hypochlorite injection instead of anaesthetic solution. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 267-270
  10. Zand V, Lotfi M, Rahimi S, Mokhtari H, Kazemi A, Sakhamanesh V. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. J Endod 2010; 36: 1234-1237
  11. Garcia AJ, Kuga MC, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Effect of sodium hypochlori