Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

What is the Prostate Specific Antigen Cut-off Value to Detect Metastases in Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography Imaging for Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

Pages
151–156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to detect a prostate specific antigen (PSA) cut-off value for metastases, and prevent unnecessary use of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography/computer tomography (CT) imaging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2017, patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were staged using Ga-68 PSMA enrolled in this retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to detect a prostate specific antigen (PSA) cut-off value for metastases, and prevent unnecessary use of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography/computer tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2017, patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were staged using Ga-68 PSMA enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) had Ga 68 PSMA for primary staging, and group 2 (G2) had Ga-68 PSMA for detection of metastases after treatment (secondary staging). PSA cut-off values were calculated for general, bone, lymph node and visceral metastases. Results: A total of 181 patients were included in this study. PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general. The PSA cut-offs for overall metastases using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.82 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For G2 patients the post-treatment PSA cut-off was 0.38 ng/mL. For bone metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 10.7 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For lymph node metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.71 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For visceral metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 16.4 ng/mL and 7.08 ng/ mL for G1 and G2, respectively. The same analyses could not be calculated in subgroups of G2 due to small sample size. Conclusion: These cut-off values do not suggest that Ga-68 PSMA is superior to using both CT and bone scintigraphy. It is an expensive test and its use is only reasonable when small lymph node metastases cannot be evaluated in CT

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖPRÜ, B., EBİLOĞLU, T., KAYA, E., ALAGÖZ, E., ZOR, M., EMER, M. Ö., GÜRDAL, M., BEDİR, S., ARSLAN, N. (2020). What is the Prostate Specific Antigen Cut-off Value to Detect Metastases in Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography Imaging for Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer?. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 151–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/334312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2016:4-5.
  2. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostatespecific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1156-1161.
  3. Nogueira L, Corradi R, Eastham JA. Prostatic specific antigen for prostate cancer detection. Int Braz J Urol 2009;35:521-529.
  4. Mottet N, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. In: European Association of Urology 2016:15-22.
  5. Abuzallouf S, Dayes I, Lukka H. Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature. J Urol 2004;171:2122-2127.
  6. Meyrick DP, Asokendaran M, Skelly LA, et al. The role of 68Ga-PSMAI&T PET/CT in the pretreatment staging of primary prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2017;38:956-963.
  7. Bailey J, Piert M. Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Management at Initial Staging and Time of Biochemical Recurrence. Curr Urol Rep 2017;19:84. Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S, et al. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol 2016;55:59-67.
  8. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2005;294:433-439.
  9. Maurer T, Gschwend J.E, Rauscher I, et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of (68) Gallium-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography Compared to Conventional Imaging for Lymph Node Staging of 130 Consecutive Patients with Intermediate to High Risk Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2016;195:1436-1443.
  10. Thompson JE, Van Leeuwen PJ, Moses D, et al. The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2016;195:1428-1435.
  11. Mena E, Lindenberg ML, Shih JH, et al. Clinical impact of PSMAbased 18F DCFBC PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after primary local therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:4-11.
  12. Sanli Y, Kuyumcu S, Sanli O, et al. Relationships between serum PSA levels, Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2017;31:709-717.
  13. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a (68) Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18) F-cholinebased PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag