Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Comparative Usefulness of High-frequency Doppler Ultrasonography, Serum PSA Density, and Free to Total Serum PSA Ratio in the Prediction of Prostate Cancer

Pages
200–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of this study highlighted that PDU may be useful to detect prostate cancer, and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsy recommendations in patients with PSA values of 4-10 ng/mL, when used in combination with free/total PSA ratio and PSA density.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we tried to assess whether power Doppler ultrasonography (PDU) evaluation along with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has an additional benefit in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4-10 ng/mL, when combined with the other methods proposed for this range of PSA.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Fifty-six patients with PSA values of 4-10 ng/mL were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of this study highlighted that PDU may be useful to detect prostate cancer, and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsy recommendations in patients with PSA values of 4-10 ng/mL, when used in combination with free/total PSA ratio and PSA density.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: In this study, we tried to assess whether power Doppler ultrasonography (PDU) evaluation along with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has an additional benefit in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4-10 ng/mL, when combined with the other methods proposed for this range of PSA. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six patients with PSA values of 4-10 ng/mL were included in the study. Digital rectal examinations, evaluation of total and free PSA, and PDU assessments were done simultaneously with TRUS and eight-core systematic prostate biopsies. Along with the latter, additional biopsies were taken from the suspicious areas detected on PDU. The free/total PSA ratios, PSA density values, TRUS, PDU findings, and biopsy results of 56 patients were recorded and evaluated. Results: Specificity and positive predictive values in detecting prostate cancer in patients with PSA range of 4-10 ng/mL, calculated using the criteria of free/total PSA values 15%, and PDU findings, were 94.87% and 75%, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those of 89.75% and 69.73%, respectively, defined for the criteria of free/total PSA values 15%. Conclusion: The results of this study highlighted that PDU may be useful to detect prostate cancer, and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsy recommendations in patients with PSA values of 4-10 ng/mL, when used in combination with free/total PSA ratio and PSA density.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, M. T., GÜNER, N. D. (2020). Comparative Usefulness of High-frequency Doppler Ultrasonography, Serum PSA Density, and Free to Total Serum PSA Ratio in the Prediction of Prostate Cancer. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 200–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/334309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-E386
  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424
  3. Albertsen PC. Observational studies and the natural history of screendetected prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2015;25:232-237
  4. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, et al. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJUI 2013;111:753-760. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611
  5. Steele CB, Li J, Huang B, et al. Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study. Cancer 2017;123(Suppl 24):5160–5177. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31026 6. Aus G, Abbou CC, Heidenreich A, et al. European Association of Urology; Guidelines On Prostate Cancer. https://uroweb.org/wpcontent/ uploads/Prostate-Cancer.pdf 7. Gerber GS, Chodak JGW. Routine screening for cancer of the prostate. J NATL Cancer Inst 1991;83:329-335
  6. Semjonow A, Brandt B, Oberpenning F, et al. Discordance of assay methods creates pitfalls for the interpretation of prostate spesific antigen values. Prostate 1996;29:3-16
  7. Semjonow A, Oberpenning F, Brandt B, et al. Impact of free prostate spesific antigen on discordant measurement results of assays for total prostate spesific antigen. Urology 1996;48:10-15
  8. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostate spesific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl Med 1991;324:1156-1161
  9. Braver MK, Chetner MP, Beatie J, et al. Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate spesific antigen. J Urol 1992;147:841-845
  10. Haas GP, Montie JE, Pontes JE. The state of prostate cancer screening in the USA. Eur Urol 1993;23:337-347
  11. Chodac GW. Early detection and screening for prostatic cancer. Urology 1989;34(Supple 4):10-12
  12. Pedersen KV, Carlssson P, Varenhorst E, et al. Screening of carcinoma of prostate by digital rectal ex. İn a randomly selected population. BMJ 1990;300:1041-1044
  13. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2017;71:618-629
  14. Leventis AK, Shariat SF, Utsunomiya T, et al. Characteristics of normal prostate v