SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Biology / 2016 / Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 2

Subitaneous egg type and focus on ancestral ruins possibility in Cypris pubera O.F. Müller, 1776 (Ostracoda, Crustacea)

Oya ÖZULUĞ
Zekiye SULUDERE
Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2017-08-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Subitaneous egg can be only seen in first laying period which explains its role in the growth stage during the C. pubera life cycle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The most important evolutional gain of some non-marine ostracods are dry- resistant eggs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Müller, 1776, eggs via Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Subitaneous egg can be only seen in first laying period which explains its role in the growth stage during the C. pubera life cycle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ostracoda · Cyprididae · C. pubera

Abstract

The most important evolutional gain of some non-marine ostracods are dry- resistant eggs. The “pause- wait” is carried out until suitable conditions are developed during the evolution of dry-resistant eggs. Through the egg-resting period, survival of ostracod individuals depends on a temporary water body. In this paper, we investigated Cypris pubera O.F. Müller, 1776, eggs via Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). We observed two different types of eggs in the life cycle of one specimen. The subitaneous egg type of the C. pubera is shown first time here. Subitaneous egg can be only seen in first laying period which explains its role in the growth stage during the C. pubera life cycle.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZULUĞ, O., SULUDERE, Z. (2017). Subitaneous egg type and focus on ancestral ruins possibility in Cypris pubera O.F. Müller, 1776 (Ostracoda, Crustacea). European Journal of Biology, Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 2, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/33232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Angell R.W., Hancock, J.W. (1989). Response of eggs of Heterocypris incongruens (Ostracoda) to experimental stress. J. Crustacean Bio. 9: 381-86.
  2. Castellani C., Lucas, I.A.N. (2003). Seasonal variation in egg morphology and hatching success in the calanoid copepods Temora longicorhis, Acartia clausi and Centropages hamatus. J. Plankton Res. 5: 527–37.
  3. Dumont H.J., Nandini S. and Sarma S.S.S. (2002) Cyst ornamentation in aquatic invertebrates: a defense against egg- predation. Hydrobiologia. 486: 161–67.
  4. Fanid L.M., Seidgar M. and Takami G.A. (2007) A comparative SEM morphological study on the egg shell in some Anostracans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from east Azerbaijan province of Iran. Iranian J. Fisheries Sci. 7:101–10.
  5. Gilchrist B.M. (1978) Scanning electron microscope studies of the egg shell in some Anostraca (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Cell Tissue Res. 193: 337–51.
  6. Horne D.J. and Martens K. (1998) An assessment of the importance of resting eggs for the evolutionary success of Mesozoic non-marine Cypridoidean Ostracoda (Crustacea). Arch. Hydrobiol, Special Issues Advanced Limnology 52; 549–61.
  7. Kesling R.V. (1951) The morphology of ostracod molt stages. Illinois Biological Monographs, University of Illinois Press, Chicago. pp. 324 Kornicker L.S. and Sohn I.G. (1971) Viability of ostracod eggs egested by sh and effect of digestive uids on ostracode shells – ecologic and paleoecologic implications. Bull. Center Rech. Pau – SNPA. 5: 125 – 35. Matzke-Karasz R. (2005) Giant spermatozoon coiled in small egg: Fertilization mechanisms and their implications for evolutionary studies on Ostracoda (Crustacea). J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 304: 129–49.
  8. Mc Kenzie K.G. and Hussainy S.U. (1968) Relevance of a freshwater Cytherid (Crustacea, Ostracoda) to the continental drift hypothesis. Nature 220: 806-808.
  9. McLay C.L. (1978) The population biology of Cyprinotus carolinensis and Herpetocypris reptans (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Can. J. Zoolog. 56: 1170-79
  10. Mura G. (2001) Morphological diversity of the resting eggs in the Anostracan genus Chirocephalus (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Hydrobiologia 450: 173– 85. Özuluğ O. and Suludere Z. (2012) Morphology of dry- resistant eggs in parthenogenetik Heterocypris incongruens (Ramdohr, 1808) (Ostracoda, Crustacea). Acta. Biol. Hung. 63: 333–41.
  11. Radzikowski J. (2013) Resistance of dormant stages of planktonic invertebrates to adverse environmental conditions. J. Plankton Res. 35: 707-23.
  12. Rossi V., Gandol A. and Menozzi P. (1996) Egg