Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5

Chemical Composition and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Different Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Lines Straw

Pages
459–463
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to, a strong relationship between straw NDF level and ME content were determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to identfy chemical composition, ruminal degradation characeristics and metabolizable energy (ME) content of five different chickpea line and a check cultivar’s straw using nylon bag technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Feed samples were incubated as three replicates of each fistulated Holstein heifer for 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to, a strong relationship between straw NDF level and ME content were determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to identfy chemical composition, ruminal degradation characeristics and metabolizable energy (ME) content of five different chickpea line and a check cultivar’s straw using nylon bag technique. Feed samples were incubated as three replicates of each fistulated Holstein heifer for 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h. Degradation characteristics of dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in rumen were determined by using this mathematical expression D=a+b(1-e -ct). Crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and ash contents of straw were ranged from 5.61 to 7.42%, 51.33 to 56.0%, 63.67 to 67.0%, and 8.0 to 9.0% respectively. Besides Rapidly soluble fraction (a), potantial degradability (a+b) and effective dry matter degradability (EDDM ) were ranged from 17.86 to 21.41, 54.40 to 59.43, 49.65 to 54.91% respectively. Estimated ME of chickpea entries straw were ranged from 5.96 to 7.37 MJ/kg. Metabolizable energy content of control chickpea cultivar was significantly higher than the other chickpea straw of lines. The research values of ME revealed that significant differences were determined among the lines in terms of energy content. In addition to, a strong relationship between straw NDF level and ME content were determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇALP, N., HIZLI, H., MART, D. (2017). Chemical Composition and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Different Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Lines Straw. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5, 459–463. https://ajindex.com/articles/332163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abreu JMF, Bruno Soares AM. 1998. Characterization and utilization of rice, legume and rape straw. Obtions Mediterraneennes –serie B, Etudes et recherché, 17: 39-51.
  2. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A, Maheri-Sis N, Baradaran-Hasanzadeh A, Asadi-Dizaji A, Mirzaei- Aghsaghali A, Dolgari-Sharaf J. 2012. Determining nutrients degradation kinetics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) straw using nylon bag technique in sheep. Open Vet. J., 2:54-57. Anonymous. 2010.
  3. Meteorological data of Adana, Turkey. Anonymous 2011. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, http://www.tuik.gov.tr. AOAC 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC. USA Bampidis VA, Christodoulou V. 2011. Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 168:1-20. nutrition: A review. Bhargava PK, Orskov ER. 1987. Manual for the use of nylon bag technique in the evaluation of feed stuffs. Rowet Research Institute. Bucksburn, Aberdeen, Scotland. Bruno-Soares AM, Abreu JMF, Guedes A, Dias-da-Silva A. 2000.
  4. Chemical composition, DM and NDF degradation kinetics in rumen of seven legume straws. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech., 83: 75–80.
  5. Fekadu D, Bediye S, Sileshi Z. 2010. Characterizing and predicting chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of crop residue using Livestock Res. Rural Develop., 22: 29.spectroscopy (NIRS). Gungor T, Başalan M, Aydogan I. 2008. Kırıkkale yöresinde üretilen bazı kaba yemlerde besin madde miktarları ve metabolize olabilir enerji düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 55: 111-115.
  6. Hadjipanayiotou M, Economides S, Koumas A. 1985. Chemical composition, digestibility and energy content of leguminous grains and straws grown in Mediterranean region. Annales de Zootechnie, 34:23–30.
  7. Kafilzadeh E, Maleki E. 2012. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and gas production of straws from different varieties and accessions of chickpea. J. Anim. Phy. and Anim. Nutr., 96:111-118. López S, Davies DR, Giráldez FJ, Dhanoa MS, Dijkstra J, France J. 2005. Assessment of nutritive value of cereal and legume straws based on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility. J. Sci. Foodand Agric., 85: 1550–1557.
  8. Mehari Sis N, Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A, Cheraghi HY, Ebrahimnezhad G, Dizaji A. 2011. Dry matter degradation kinetics and metabolizable energy of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) straw in ruminants. Res. J. Biyo. Sci., 6: 635-638. Ørskov ER, Mc Donald I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability measurements weighed according to rate