Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of Various Wavelengths of LED Light on the Physiological and Morphological Parameters of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.)

Pages
965–970
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to data obtained, the different wavelengths of the coloured light applied in the growing environment created a change in colour and brightness of the leaves, height of the plant, length of the roots, and number of leaves and roots.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to examine the effect of five different wavelengths of light on the comfrey plant (Symphytum officinale) (family Boraginaceae).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The light source and wavelengths used in the study were UV-A (390-410 nm), blue (465-485 nm), red (620-630 nm) and cool white (CW) daylight (400-700 nm, 6500 K), LED (Light Emitting Diode).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to data obtained, the different wavelengths of the coloured light applied in the growing environment created a change in colour and brightness of the leaves, height of the plant, length of the roots, and number of leaves and roots.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of five different wavelengths of light on the comfrey plant (Symphytum officinale) (family Boraginaceae). The light source and wavelengths used in the study were UV-A (390-410 nm), blue (465-485 nm), red (620-630 nm) and cool white (CW) daylight (400-700 nm, 6500 K), LED (Light Emitting Diode). In the study, each of the 5 different light applications was applied for 45 days (T1: 100% blue; T2: 100% red; T3: 60% blue + 35% red + 5% UV-A; T4: 100% CW daylight; T5: 80% CW + 20% red). The experiments were carried out under conditions of 22C temperature, 60% humidity, 16/8 hours light/dark and 180 µmol.m-2.s-1 Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR). After each application, measurements were taken of number of leaves, number of roots, height of plant, amount of chlorophyll in leaves, leaf colour and brightness. According to data obtained, the different wavelengths of the coloured light applied in the growing environment created a change in colour and brightness of the leaves, height of the plant, length of the roots, and number of leaves and roots.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAYAN, N., SÖZMEN, E. U., ERTEKİN, C. (2020). The Effect of Various Wavelengths of LED Light on the Physiological and Morphological Parameters of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 965–970. https://ajindex.com/articles/331832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aceves-Avila F, Medina F, Fraga A. 2001. Therapies in rheumatology: The persistence of ancient medical practices. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol., 19: 177-83. Anonymous. 1996. Hunter lab colour scale applications note, vol.8, No.9, Hunter associates Lab., Virginia, pp. 1 -4. https://support.hunterlab.com›article_attachments [Accessed 15.09.2019].
  2. Bach N, Thung SN, Schaffner F. 1989. Comfrey herb teainduced hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Am. J. Med., 87(1):97-99.
  3. Blumenthal M, Busse W, Goldberg A, Gruenwald J, Hall T, Riggins C. 1998. The Complete German Commission E Monographs: Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines Texas: American Botanical Council. https://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/712613/complete german-commission-e-monographs-therapeutic-guideherbal-medicines [Accessed 11.09.2019].
  4. Brown C, Shuerger AC, Sager JC. 1995. Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red lightemitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 120: 808-813.
  5. Caglayan N, Ertekin C. 2011. Bitkisel Üretim İçin LED Yetiştirme Lambalarının Kullanımı. Uluslararası Katılımlı I. Ali Numan Kıraç Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı. Eskişehir, Türkiye, 27-30 April 2011, ss. 1227-1232.
  6. Caglayan N, Erteki, C. 2016. Sebze Üretiminde İlave LED Aydınlatma Uygulamaları. Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, 12(1): 27-35.
  7. De Albuquerque U, Monteiro J, Ramos M, de Amorim E. 2007. Medicinal and magic plants from a public market in northeastern Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol., 110: 76-91. Freed RD. 1988. MSTAT-C. Michigan State University. Crop and Soil Science Version 2.10. Frost R, MacPherson H, O’Meara S. 2013. A critical scoping review of external uses of comfrey (Symphytum spp.). Complement. Ther. Med. 21: 724-745. Furuya M. 1993. Phytochromes: their molecular species, gene families and functions. Ann. Rev. Plant Physio., 44: 617-645
  8. Grube B, Grunwald J, Krug L, Stagier C. 2007. Efficacy of a comfrey root (Symphyti offic. radix) extract ointment in the treatment of patients with painful osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a double-blind, randomised, bicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Phytomedicine, 14: 2-10. Hatfield G. 2005. Hatfield's Herbal: The Curious Stories of Britain's Wild Plants. London: Penguin Global. ISBN: 9780141025148. Heckman RA. 2004. The bactericidal properties of comfrey (Symphytum officinale) herbal extracts. Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University: Pavia Sales Group, Inc. (pamphlet). Huang J, Padmanabhan K, Collins OM. 2011. The Sampling Th