SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 11

The Non-Linear Relation between Governance and Efficiency: Evidence from Agriculture

NİZAMETTİN BAYYURT
ZEHRA VİLDAN SERİN
Pages
1334–1341
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, a quadratic form of regression was the fitting model that is the marginal effects of good governance on performance are increasing in high values of governance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to explore the relations between governance and agricultural performance of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data Envelopment Analysis was used to find out agricultural performance of 81 countries at first stage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, a quadratic form of regression was the fitting model that is the marginal effects of good governance on performance are increasing in high values of governance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relations between governance and agricultural performance of countries. Data Envelopment Analysis was used to find out agricultural performance of 81 countries at first stage. Panel data regression was employed in the second stage to assess the relations between performance levels of countries and their governance. Six governance indicators namely; voice and accountability, control of corruption, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and political stability and violence were analyzed in this stage. Findings show that firstly, governance indicators are highly correlated with each other. Secondly, developed countries are more efficient and have better governance than developing and undeveloped countries. Finally, a quadratic form of regression was the fitting model that is the marginal effects of good governance on performance are increasing in high values of governance.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYYURT, N., SERİN, Z. V. (2017). The Non-Linear Relation between Governance and Efficiency: Evidence from Agriculture. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 11, 1334–1341. https://ajindex.com/articles/331615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. References Azmat F, Coghill K. 2005. Good governance and marketbasedreforms: a study of Bangladesh. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71: 625-638.
  2. Bayyurt N, Yilmaz S. 2012. The impacts of governance andeducation on agricultural efficiency: an international analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1158 – 1165. Bayyurt N, Serin ZV, Arıkan FE. 2015. Good Governance and Agricultural Efficiency, Journal of Social and Development Sciences Vol. 6, No. 1, March, pp. 14-23.
  3. Beckmann V, Boger S. 2003. Courts and contract enforcement intransition agriculture: theory and evidence from Poland. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists. Boland M. 2009. What is Value-added Agriculture? AgriculturalMarketing Resource Center. Available at http://www.agmrc.org/business_development/getting_prepared/ valueadded_agriculture/articles/ Campos JE, Lien D, Pradhan S. 1999. “The Impact of Corruptionon Investment: Predictability Matters”, World Development, Vol.27, Issue:6, pp.1059–1067
  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring theefficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6): 429-444.
  5. Charnes, A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM. 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Çakmak E, Dudu H, Öcal N. 2008. Efficiency in TurkishAgriculture and a Quantitative Analysis (Turkish), Ankara:
  6. TEPAV De Gorter H, Tsur Y. 1991. Explaining Price Policy Bias InAgriculture: The Calculus of Support-Maximising Politicians. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4): 1244– 1254. Deliktaş E, Ersungur SM, Candemir M. 2005. The comparasion of agricultural efficiency and productivity growth in the EU and Turkey, 1980-2002.
  7. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 1, pp.109-124 Feng Y. 2003.
  8. Democracy, Governance and EconomicPerformance: Theory and Evidence, Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.
  9. Fuglie KO, Wang SL. 2013. New evidence points to robust butuneven productivity growth in global agriculture. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 5(1): 23-30.
  10. Ghalambaz F, Moghaddasi R, Moohammadinejad A. 2015. Theimpact of good governance indicators on agricultural efficiency of developing countries. MAGNT Research Report (ISSN,144-8939), 3(2): 12-20.
  11. Globerman S, Shapiro D, Tang Y. 2006. Foreign directinvestment in emerging and transition European countries. Center for International Business, Western Washington University Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T. 200