Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Effects on Growth Performance of Some Chick Quality Measurements in Broilers

Pages
648–654
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mortality of the experimental groups showed significant differences in the groups other than the shank length group (P<0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to examine the effect of 4 different quality criteria (chick weight, toe length, shank length and chick length) on live weight, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and mortality in broiler chicks at the end of the fattening period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 192 male broiler chicks were used in the experiment, and two separate groups were formed for each quality criterion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mortality of the experimental groups showed significant differences in the groups other than the shank length group (P<0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was conducted to examine the effect of 4 different quality criteria (chick weight, toe length, shank length and chick length) on live weight, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and mortality in broiler chicks at the end of the fattening period. A total of 192 male broiler chicks were used in the experiment, and two separate groups were formed for each quality criterion. In 1 day-old chicks, a heavy group and a light group (≥47.7 g and <47.7 g) were created for chick weight; and a tall group and a short group were created for each of the toe length (≥2.01 cm and <2.01 cm), shank length (≥2.9 cm and <2.9 cm) and chick length (≥18.3 cm and <18.3 cm) criteria. At the end of the six-week fattening period, the live weight was significantly higher in the heavy group compared to the light group; in the short toe group compared to the tall toe group; and in the short chick length group compared to the tall chick length group (P<0.01 and P<0.01). In terms of feed consumption, more feed was consumed in the heavy group compared to the light group; in the short shank group compared to the tall shank group; and in the short chick length group compared to the tall chick length group (P<0.01). The feed conversion ratios were influenced by the quality criteria, and the feed efficiency was better in the heavy group compared to the light group; in the short toe group compared to the tall toe group; and in the short chick length group compared to the tall chick length group. The mortality of the experimental groups showed significant differences in the groups other than the shank length group (P<0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÜL, T., ERÜKÇÜ, M. (2019). Effects on Growth Performance of Some Chick Quality Measurements in Broilers. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 648–654. https://ajindex.com/articles/330677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abiola, S.S., Meshioye, O.O., Oyerinde, B.O., Bamgbose, M.A. 2008. Effect of egg size on hatchability of broiler chicks. Archivos de Zootecnia, 57: 83-86.
  2. Geidam, Y.A., Ibrahim, U.I., Bukar, M.M., Gambo, H.I., Ojo, O. 2007. Quality Assessment of broiler day-old chicks supplied to Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6(2): 107-110.
  3. Hill, D. 2001. Chick length uniformity profiles as a field measurement of chick quality. Avian Poultry Biology Reviews, 12: 188 (Abst.). Hill, D. 2002. Performance losses: Incubation and brooding. International Hatchery Practice, 16(8). İpek, A., Sözcü, A. 2013. Broiler chick quality and scoring methods. U.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2):131-137.
  4. Kamanlı, S., Durmuş, İ., Demir, S. 2010. Hatching characteristics of abnormal eggs. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5(4): 271-274.
  5. Kamanlı, S., Durmuş, İ. 2014. Civciv kalitesi değerlendirme yöntemleri ve civciv kalitesinin iyileştirilmesi konusundaki son yaklaşımlar. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi, 11(1): 40-44.
  6. Ketels, P. 2011. Controlling chick quality. Thesis Project. Livestock Management. Meijerhof, R. 2005. What Count for Chick Quality? Hybro B.V., Boxmeer, the Netherlands. Molenaar, R., Reijrink, I., Meijerhof, R., Brand, H.V.D., 2007. Relationship between chick length and chick weight at hatch and slaughter weight and breast meat yield in broilers. Proc. 3rd Combined Workshop on Fundamental Physiology and Perinatal Development in Poultry, 5-10
  7. October, Berlin. Molenaar, R., Reijrink, I.A.M., Meijerhof, R., Brand, H.V.D., 2008. Relationship between hatchling length and weight on later productive performance in broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal, 64. Ojepado, L.O. 2013. Evaluation of body weight and other linear parameters of Marshall Broiler for repeatability estimates. International Journal of Applied Agriculture and Apiculture Research, 9(1-2): 175-181.
  8. Ould-Ali, D., Schulte-Drüggelte, R. 2016. Review of different day-old chick quality parameters in layer type breeds. International Poultry Production, 23: 4. Petek, M., Orman, A., Dikmen, S., Alpay, F. 2008. Relations between day-old chick length and body weight in broiler, quail and layer. Uludağ Univ. J. Fac. Vet. Med., 27(1-2): 25-28.
  9. Reijrink, I., Molenaar, R. 2006. Chick Length & Organ Development. http://en.engormix.com/articles_view.aspx?AREA= AVG&id=155&pag=0. Şeremet, Ç. 2012. Civciv kalitesini etkileyen etmenler ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. Hayvansal Üretim