Journals / Türk Toraks Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Küçük hücreli akciğer kanserli olgularımızda sağkalım ve prognostik faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi: Tek merkez deneyimi

The relationship between prognostic factors and overall survival in small cell lung cancer patients: A single centre experience

Pages
60–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall median survival was 14.2 months.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Age, sex, weight loss, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, hemoglobin concentration, stage and ECOG performance status (PS) have been accepted as prognostic factors for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: A total of 106 patients with SCLC, between 2005 and 2008, were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall median survival was 14.2 months.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Age, sex, weight loss, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, hemoglobin concentration, stage and ECOG performance status (PS) have been accepted as prognostic factors for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In our study, we aim to evaluate the relationship between prognostic factors and survival in patients with SCLC. Material and Method: A total of 106 patients with SCLC, between 2005 and 2008, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The median age of patients at diagnosis was 59.3 and 89.6% of patients were male; 33.1% of patients were older than 65 years and 73 patients were younger than 65 years of age. 54 out of 106 patients had limited stage disease (LSD) (52.9%), and 48 had extended stage disease (ESD) (47.1%). The ratio of PS 0-1 and 2 patients were 77.3% and 22.7% respectively. 36% of them had high serum LDH level and 29.3% had low hemoglobin level. In our study, clinical response was achieved in 71.2% of patients. Overall median survival was 14.2 months. While median survival was 19.7 month in LSD, in ESD it was 9.1 months and stage was found to be prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that there were no correlations among median survival and PS, LDH level, weight loss, sex, age (p>0.05). Conclusion: Although we found no relationship between prognostic factors and median survival and progression free survival, the patients with LSD had more prolonged OS than ESD. Whenever possible, more SCLC patients may be included in future clinical trials to detect the relationship between prognostic factors and overall survival time. (Tur Toraks Der 2012; 13: 60-4)

Özet

Amaç: Akciğer kanserleri kansere bağlı ölüm nedenleri arasında ilk sırada yer almaktadır. Küçük hücreli akciğer kanserleri (KHAK) daha kötü prognoz ve daha az sağ kalım oranlarına sahip olması, tedavisinde kemoterapinin daha fazla yer alması nedeniyle, ayrı bir yere sahiptir. KHAK’de yaş, cinsiyet, kilo kaybı, LDH düzeyi, hemoglobin düzeyi, hastalığın evresi, performans durumu prognozu etkileyen faktörler arasında sayılmaktadır. Biz de bu prognostik faktörleri ve toplam sağkalımı belirlemek amacıyla 106 KHAK hastasını değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıbbi Onkoloji Kliniği’nde 2005-2008 yılları arasında takip edilen 106 KHAK vakasını retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. Bulgular: Yüzaltı vakanın 54’ü sınırlı evre (%52.9), 48’i yaygın evre (%47.1) hastalık idi. Median yaş 59.3 (41-88) iken 33 hasta 65 yaşının üstü, 73 hasta 65 yaş altında idi. Erkek hastalar %89.6 ile çoğunluktaydı. Hastalarımızda en sık kullandığımız tanı yöntemi bronkoskopi (%74.8) olup median 6 kür uyguladığımız en sık kemoterapi rejimi %87.8 ile cisplatin etoposid kombinasyonuydu. Tedavi sonrası %71.2 hastada cevap alındı. Ortanca sağkalım ile performans statüsü, LDH düzeyi, kilo kaybı, cinsiyet, yaş arasında multivarite analizinde istatistiksel anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. Sınırlı evrede median sağkalım 19.7 ay iken, yaygın evre hastalıkta 9.1 ay olup istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p=0.001). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda prognostik faktörlerle genel sağkalım ve progresyonsuz sağkalım arasında ilişki bulamadık. Prognostik faktörleri değerlendirmek için artırılmış hasta sayısı ile yeni çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. (Tur Toraks Der 2012; 13: 60-4)

🔖

Cite This Article

USTAALİOĞLU, B. B. Ö., BİLİCİ, A., ŞEKER, M., SALEPÇİ, T., USTAALİOĞLU, R., CÖMERT, S., MAYADAĞLI, A., GÜMÜŞ, M. (2012). Küçük hücreli akciğer kanserli olgularımızda sağkalım ve prognostik faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi: Tek merkez deneyimi. Türk Toraks Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 60–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/329500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Simon GR, Turrisi A; American College of Chest Physicians. Management of small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidencebased clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132(3 Suppl):324S-39S
  2. Rossi A, Maione P, Colantuoni G, et al. Treatment of small cell lung cancer in the elderly. Oncologist 2005;10:399-411
  3. Lassen U, Qsterlind K, Hansen M, et al. Long-term survival in small-cell lung cancer: posttreatment characteristics in patients surviving 5 to 18+ years--an analysis of 1,714 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1215-20
  4. Siu LL, Shepherd FA, Murray N, et al. Influence of age on the treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:821-8
  5. Albain KS, Crowley JJ, LeBlanc M, et al. Determinants of improved outcome in small cell lung cancer: An analysis of the 2580 patient southwest oncology group data base. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1563-74
  6. Sagman U, Feld R, Evans WK, et al. The prognostic significance of pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase in patients with small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:954-61
  7. Eckardt JR. Emerging role of weekly topetecan in recurrent small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 2004;9:25-32
  8. Sher T, Dy GK, Adjei AA. Small cell lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:355-67
  9. Okuno SH, Jett JR. Small cell lung cancer: Current theraphy and promising new regimens. Oncologist 2002;7:234-8
  10. Ganti AK, Mulshine JL. Lung cancer screening. Oncologist 2006;11:481-7
  11. Chute JP, Venzon PD, Hankins L, et al. Outcome of patients with small cell lung cancer during 20 years of clinical research at the US National Cancer Institute. Mayo Clinic Proc 1997;72:901-12
  12. Lally BE, Urbanic JJ, Blackstock AW, et al. Small cell lung cancer: Have we made any progress over the last 25 years? Oncologist 2007;12:1096-111
  13. Torun E, Fidan A, Çağlayan B, ve ark. Küçük hücreli akciğer kanserinde prognostik faktörler. Tüberküloz ve Toraks Dergisi 2008;56:22-9
  14. Hunchharek M, McGarry R. A metaanalysis of timing of chest irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 2004;9:665-72
  15. Spiegelman D, Maurer H, Ware JH, et al. Prognostic factors in small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an analysis of 1,521 patients. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:344-54
  16. Rawson NS, Peto J. An overview of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer. A report from the subcommittee for the management of lung cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on cancer research. B