Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys

Atnalı böbreklerde perkütan nefrolitotomi

Pages
495–499
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall stone free rates were above %80 and major complication rates were not above 12.5%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Horseshoe kidneys are the most common renal fusion anomalies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The stones that failed by shock wave lithotripsy or greater than 2 cm are best managed percutaneously.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall stone free rates were above %80 and major complication rates were not above 12.5%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Böbrek · Nefrostomi · perkütan

Abstract

Introduction: Horseshoe kidneys are the most common renal fusion anomalies. Urolithiasis is the most common complication that occurs in these patients. Percutaneous management of the stones in horseshoe kidneys can be challenging due to altered anatomical relations. Small stones associated with horseshoe kidneys are best managed by shock wave lithotripsy. The stones that failed by shock wave lithotripsy or greater than 2 cm are best managed percutaneously. The overall stone free rates were above %80 and major complication rates were not above 12.5%. Percutaneous treatment of patients with renal calculi in horseshoe kidney is technically challenging usually requiring upper pole access and flexible nephroscopy. The success and relatively low complication rate suggest that percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective means of stone management in this patient population.

Özet

Atnalı böbrek en sık rastlanılan füzyon bozukluğu olup, istenmeyen yan etkinin en sık gözlendiği taş hastalığıdır. Bu böbreklerdeki taşların perkütan tedavisi anatomik farklılıklardan dolayı zor olabilir. Atnalı böbreklerdeki küçük taşlar beden dışından şok dalga tedavisi ile etkin bir şekilde tedavi edilebilmektedir. Şok dalga litotripsi ile tedavi edilemeyen veya 2 cm’den büyük taşları olan olgularda ise perkütan cerrahi en iyi sonuçlara sahiptir. Perkütan cerrahi %12.5’i geçmeyen önemli istenmeyen yan etki oranları ile %80’in üzerinde taşsızlık sağlamaktadır. Atnalı böbreklerde perkütan taş cerrahisi teknik olarak zor olan ve genellikle üst pol aksesi ile gerçekleştirilen ve fleksibl nefroskop gereksinimi duyulan bir yaklaşımdır. Perkütan nefrolitotomi düşük istenmeyen yan etki oranları ve yüksek başarı oranları ile atnalı böbrekli hastalarda taş tedavisinde etkin ve güvenli bir yöntemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLEN, C. Y., ŞAHİN, A. (2006). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 495–499. https://ajindex.com/articles/329057

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Salas M, Gelet A, Martin X, et al: Horseshoe kidney: The impact of percutaneous surgery. Eur Urol. 21: 134-7,1992
  2. Janetschek G and Kunzel KH: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys. Br J Urol. 62: 117-122,1988
  3. Cussenot O, Desgrandchamps F, Ollier P, et al: Anatomical bases of percutaneous surgery for calculi in a horseshoe kidney. Surg Radiol Anat. 14: 209-13, 1992
  4. Peartree RJ, Ruotolo RA, Khuri FJ and Valvo JR: Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidney. Urology 28: 41-3, 1986
  5. Stening SG and Bourne S: Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. J Endourol.12: 359-62, 1998
  6. Ryan JM, Murphy BL, Lee MJ, et al: Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy in a patient with horseshoe kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 169: 447-51, 1997
  7. Fletcher EW and Kettlewell MG: Antegrade pyelography in a horseshoe kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol.119: 720-2, 1973
  8. Wickham JE and Kellet MJ: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br Med J. (Clin Res Ed). 283(6306): 1571-2, 1981
  9. Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP, et al: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an approach to branched and staghorn renal calculi. JAMA. 250: 73-75, 1983
  10. Lampel A, Hohenfeller M, Schultz-Lampel D, et al: Urolithiasis in horseshoe kidneys: Therapeutic management. Urology, 47:182-186, 1996
  11. Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, et al: Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: Single-center experience and review of literature. J Endourol. 19: 353-358, 2005
  12. Vandeursen H, Baert L: Electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol. 148: 1120-1122, 1992
  13. Locke DR, Newman RC, Steinbach GS, et al: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in horseshoe kidneys. Urology, 35: 407-411, 1990
  14. Esuvaranathan K, Tan EC, Tung KH, et al: Stones in horseshoe kidneys: Results of treatment by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourology. J Urol. 146:1213-1215, 1991
  15. Yohannes P, Smith A: The endourological management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol, 168: 5-8, 2002 16- Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, et al: Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J Urol,170: 48-51, 2003
  16. Park S, Pearle MS: Imaging for percutaneous renal access and management of renal calculi. Urol Clin N Am.33: 353-364, 2006
  17. Skoog SJ, Read MD, Gaudier FA, et al: The posterolateral and retrorenal coon: Implication in percutaneous stoen extraction. J Urol. 134: 110-112. 1985
  18. Ghani KR