This is the first case performing and discussing VLAP as an alternative treatment option, which both treatment options couldn’t be performed.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Transuretral resection of prostatectomy is difficult often impossible in the presence of penile prosthesis Transurethal resection with large resectoscopes and transperineal-uretral resection are the treatment modalities in these patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Introduction: Transuretral resection of prostatectomy is difficult often impossible in the presence of penile prosthesis Transurethal resection with large resectoscopes and transperineal-uretral resection are the treatment modalities in these patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is the first case performing and discussing VLAP as an alternative treatment option, which both treatment options couldn’t be performed.
Introduction: Transuretral resection of prostatectomy is difficult often impossible in the presence of penile prosthesis Transurethal resection with large resectoscopes and transperineal-uretral resection are the treatment modalities in these patients. This is the first case performing and discussing VLAP as an alternative treatment option, which both treatment options couldn’t be performed.
Özet
Daha önceden bükülebilir (malleable) penil protez takılı hastalarda BPH nedeniyle klasik rezektoskoplarla transuretral rezeksiyon güçleşmektedir. Bu hastalarda alternatif yaklaşım olan transperineal-uretral rezeksiyon ve uzun rezektoskop ile transüretral yaklaşım seçenekleri mevcuttur. Her iki seçeneğinde uygulanamadığı hastamızda alternatif tedavi yaklaşımı VLAP uygulanmış, bu yöntemin gerekçeleri tartışılmış olup bu konuda ilk olgu sunumu olmaktadır.
KALKAN, M., UZUN, H., AKKUŞ, E., ALTINTAŞ, R., ÇETİNKAYA, M. (2004). VLAP in patients with malleable penile prosthesis whom transurethral resection could not be applied. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 376–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/329023
Uchida T, Egawa S, Iwamura M, et al: A non- randomized comparative study of visual laser ab- lation and transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Urol Mar;3 (2): 108-12, 1996
Wada S, Yoshimura R, Kyo M, et al: Compa- rative study of transurethral laser prostatectomy versus transurethral electroresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Urol Oct; 7 (10): 373- 7, 2000
Floratos DL, Sonke GS, Francisca EA et al: Long-term follow-up of laser treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction. Urology Oct 1; 56(4): 604-9, 2000
Jung P, Mattelaer P, Wolff JM, Mersdorf A, et al: Visual laser ablation of the prostate: Effica- cy evaluated by urodynamics and compared to TURP. Eur Urol 30(4): 418-23, 1996
Cowles RS 3rd, Kabalin JN, Childs S, et al: A prospective randomized comparison of transu- rethral resection to visual laser ablation of tre prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hy- perplasia. Urology Aug; 46 (2): 155-60, 1995
Mattelaer P, Jung P, Wolff J, Jakse G et al: Visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP): An effective alternative treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Acta Urol Belg Sep; 63(3): 45-9, 1995.