Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2007 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Evaluatıon of symptoms due to ureteral stents

Üreteral stentlere bağlı yakınmaların değerlendirilmesi

Pages
75–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patients were followed with a questionnaire consisting of 14 questions concerning urgency, incontinence, painful voiding, incomplete emptying, urethral pain, hematuria, sleep disturbance, need for analgesics, overall weakness, social life enjoyment, sexual dysfunction, getting permission from work/school, urinary tract infection and the need for extra antibiotics at 1 and 4 weeks after stent insertion and 1 week after stent removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Double J ureteral stents are being used in urological practice for more than 25 years and in the recent years indications have continued to expand.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The majority of the uncomfortable symptoms are related to urinary tract and these symptoms have severe negative impact on patients’ general health status and quality of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patients were followed with a questionnaire consisting of 14 questions concerning urgency, incontinence, painful voiding, incomplete emptying, urethral pain, hematuria, sleep disturbance, need for analgesics, overall weakness, social life enjoyment, sexual dysfunction, getting permission from work/school, urinary tract infection and the need for extra antibiotics at 1 and 4 weeks after stent insertion and 1 week after stent removal.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stentler · Anketler · İleriye dönük çalışma

Abstract

Introduction: Double J ureteral stents are being used in urological practice for more than 25 years and in the recent years indications have continued to expand. Thus the complications and side effects of ureteral stents are also more frequent than previously reported. In addition to the severe complications resulting from forgotten or intentionally left stents for longer durations in ureters, they might also cause physical and emotional side effects due to bothering symptoms. The majority of the uncomfortable symptoms are related to urinary tract and these symptoms have severe negative impact on patients’ general health status and quality of life. In this study, we evaluated the symptoms bothering the patient and impairing the quality of life due to stents. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty eight men and 79 women who were treated with ureteral double J stents were recruited. The patients were followed with a questionnaire consisting of 14 questions concerning urgency, incontinence, painful voiding, incomplete emptying, urethral pain, hematuria, sleep disturbance, need for analgesics, overall weakness, social life enjoyment, sexual dysfunction, getting permission from work/school, urinary tract infection and the need for extra antibiotics at 1 and 4 weeks after stent insertion and 1 week after stent removal. In addition to the presence or absence of a symptom, the frequency of the symptom, when it is present, was also asked based on a subjective classification [occasionally (25%), sometimes (50%), most of the time (75%), all of the time (100%)]. The symptoms of each period are compared by statistical analysis. Results: The mean age was 40.1 (range: 8-80) years. The indications for double J insertion were nephroureterolithiasis (n: 184), pregnancy related hydronephrosis (n: 8), malignancy (n: 7), ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n: 5), ureterovesical junction obstruction (n: 2), perforation (n: 1). There was no history of previous double J stent insertion in any patient. Double J stents were inserted to the right, left and both ureters in 92, 100 and 15 patients respectively. All double J stents used in the study were made up of polyethylene and except for 4 patients’ stents with 6F diameter and 26 cm length were inserted. In the 4 pediatric patients 4.8 F diameter and 16 cm length double J stents were used. There was no change in the social life enjoyment with stent placement or removal. All other symptoms increased with the increased duration of the stent and decreased with the removal. The most significant two symptoms at the post insertion one week were painful voiding (43%) and urgency (41%) resulting from irritation of the stent. Also these two symptoms were significantly high (73%) at the fourth week. Conclusion: The results of our study indicates that ureteral stents have negative impact on general health status, sexual functions, school/work performance and quality of life in addition to the increased urinary tract related symptoms, and these negative effects increase with the duration of the stent. Therefore, the indications and durations of the ureteral stents must be revisited in the light of the quality of life, and unnecessary insertions and longer durations should be avoided.

Özet

Çift J üreteral stentler yaklaşık 30 yıla yakın bir süredir üroloji pratiğinde kullanılmakta olup son yıllarda kullanım endikasyonları giderek artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada stent kullanımına bağlı hastayı rahatsız eden ve hayat kalitesini bozan belirtilerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Değişik endikasyonlarla üreteral stent takılan 128 erkek, 79 kadın toplam 207 hastaya; ani sıkışma hissi, idrar kaçırma, ağrılı işeme, idrar boşaltımının tam olmaması duyumu, üretral ağrı, idrardan kan gelmesi, uyku bozukluğu, ağrı kesici kullanımı, genel halsizlik, hayattan zevk alma, cinsel işlev bozukluğu, işten veya okuldan izin alma, idrar yolu enfeksiyonu geçirme ve ilave antibiyotik kullanımından oluşan 14 soru stent takıldıktan sonra 1. ve 4. haftalar ile stent çıkarıldıktan sonraki ilk hafta olmak üzere 3 farklı dönem için soruldu ve sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak kıyaslandı. Stentin üreterde kalma süresi arttıkça hayattan zevk alma dışında tüm belirti ve bulgularda anlamlı artış saptandı. Stentin çıkarılması ile birlikte yine hayattan zevk alma dışında tüm bulgularda anlamlı düzelmeler saptadı. Üreteral stentler kişilerin yaşam kaliteleri üzerinde oldukça olumsuz etki yapmakta olup bu etkiler stentin vücutta kalma süresi ile beraber daha da şiddetlenmektedir. Bu nedenle gittikçe daha fazla kullanılmaya başlanan üreteral stentlerin kullanım endikasyonları ve kullanım süreleri yaşam kalitesi açısından tekrar gözden geçirilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYLU, A., ALTUNOLUK, B., SÖYLEMEZ, H., YOLOĞLU, S., BAYDİNÇ, Y. C. (2007). Evaluatıon of symptoms due to ureteral stents. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 75–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/329002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Finney RP: Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol.120: 678-681, 1978
  2. Saltzman B: Ureteral stents. Indications, variations, and complications. Urol Clin North Am. 15: 481-491, 1988
  3. Monga M, Klein E, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, et al: The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: A urological dilemma. J Urol. 153: 1817-1819, 1995
  4. Hollenbeck BK, Schuster TG, Faerber GJ, et al: Routine placement of ureteral stents is unnecessary after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi. Urology. 57: 639-43, 2001
  5. Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, et al: The indwelling ureteric stent: A 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 85: 408-411, 2000
  6. Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al: Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: Management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology. 58: 526-31, 2001
  7. Soylu A, Altunoluk B, Güneş A ve ark: Unutulmuş üreteral stente bağlı böbrek kaybı. Türk Üroloji Dergisi, 30: 245-248, 2003
  8. Duvdevani M, Chew BH, Denstedt JD: Minimizing symptoms in patients with ureteric stents. Curr Opin Urol 16: 77-82, 2006
  9. Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, Keeley FX Jr, et al: Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis. J Endourol 15: 151-154, 2001
  10. Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, et al: Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol 169: 1060-1064, 2003
  11. Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, et al: Indwelling ureteral stents: Evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol; 169: 1065-1069, 2003
  12. Jeong H, Kwak C, Lee SE: Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: A prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complications. BJU Int. 93: 1032-1034; discussion 1034-1035, 2004
  13. Lee C, Kuskowski M, Premoli J, et al: Randomized evaluation of Ureteral Stents using validated Symptom Questionnaire. J Endourol. 19: 990-993, 2005
  14. Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Denstedt JD: The use of stents in contemporary urology. Curr Opin Urol. 14: 111-115, 2004
  15. Netto NR Jr, Ikonomidis J, Zillo C: Routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis: Is it really necessary? J Urol. 166: 1252-1254, 2001
  16. Borboroglu PG, Amling CL, Schenkman NS, et al: Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: A multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications. J Urol. 166: 1651-1657, 2001. 17-