Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2002 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Relationship between leak point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with stress urinary incontinence

Stres üriner inkontinanslı hastalarda abdominal kaçırma nokta basıncı ile maksimal üretral kapanma basınç değerleri arasındaki ilişki

Pages
321–324
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to our results, if only UPP is used in the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency, it may cause misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment in patients with stress urinary incontinence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) correlate with parameters of urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) in patients with stress urinary incontinence or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Urodynamic data obtained from 226 women with stress urinary incontinence were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to our results, if only UPP is used in the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency, it may cause misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment in patients with stress urinary incontinence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üretra · İdrar kaçırma · stres

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) correlate with parameters of urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) in patients with stress urinary incontinence or not. Urodynamic data obtained from 226 women with stress urinary incontinence were evaluated. The urodynamic diagnosis was performed with multi channel urodynamics. ALPP and maximal urethral closure pressure, functional urethral length, total profile area, proximal profile area, and distal profile area were measured. The mean age of patients was 49.3$\pm$0.9. Anatomic stress urinary incontinance in 204 patients (90.3%) and intrinsic sphincter deficiency in 22 patient (%9.7) were detected. Only results of ALPP was found statistically significant between groups (p<0.001). UPP results were not found statistically significant between groups (p<0.05). Additionally, there was no correlation between ALPP and UPP results. According to our results, if only UPP is used in the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency, it may cause misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment in patients with stress urinary incontinence.

Özet

Bu çalışmada stres üriner inkontinanslı hastalarda abdominal kaçırma nokta basıncı (AKNB) ile üretral basınç profilometrisi (ÜBP) parametreleri arasında herhangi bir ilişki olup olmadığını değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Ürodinamik olarak incelenen stres üriner inkontinanslı 226 kadın hastanın bulguları değerlendirildi. Ürodinamik inceleme çok kanallı ürodinami cihazı ile yapıldı. Hastaların AKNB, maksimal üretral kapanma basıncı, fonksiyonel üretra uzunluğu, total, proksimal ve distal profil alanları ölçüldü. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 49.3$\pm$0.9 idi. Hastaların 204'ünde (%90.3) anatomik stres üriner inkontinans, 22'sinde (%9.7) ise intrinsik sfikter defekt saptandı. Gruplar arasında sadece AKNB istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık gösterirken (p 0.05). Ayrıca AKNB ile hiçbir UPP parametresi arasında korelasyon bulunamadı (p>0.05). Bulgularımıza göre intrinsik sfinkter defektinin tanısında sadece üretral basınç profilometrisini kullanmak stres üriner inkontinanslı hastalarda yanlış tanılara ve uygunsuz tedavilere yol açabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARHAN, F., ERBAY, E., KUYUMCUOĞLU, U. (2002). Relationship between leak point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 321–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/328963

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Diokno AC: Epidemiology and psychosocial as-pect of incontinence. Urol Clin N Amer, 22: 481-6, 1995
  2. Raz S, Little NA, Juma S: Female Urology in Campbell’s Urology (Walsh PC, Retik AB, Sta-mey TA, Vaughan ED, ed) 6th edition. Philadelp-hia, Saunders. Vol 3, 2782-2828, 1992
  3. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL: The stan-dardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol (suppl 6), s: 1-16, 1990
  4. Haab F, Zimmern PE, Leach GA: Female uri-nary stress incontinence due to intrinsic sphinc-tric deficiency: Recognition and management. J Urol. 156: 3-17, 1996
  5. Richardson DA, Ramani A, Chalas E: Surgical management of stress incontinence in patient with low urethral pressure. Gynecol Obst Invest. 31: 106-109, 1991
  6. Ramon J, Mekras JA, Webster GD: The outco-me of transvaginal cystourethropexy in patients with anatomical stress urinary incontinence and outlet weakness. J Urol. 144: 106-108, 1990
  7. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA: Nega-tive Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed inconti-nence surgery in women. J Reprod Med. 34: 193-197, 1989
  8. Tapp AJS, Cardozo LD, Versi E, et al: The prevalence of variation of resting urethral pressu-re in women and its association with lower urina-ry tract function. Br J Urol. 61: 314-317, 1988
  9. Versi E: Discriminant analysis of urethral pres-sure profilometry data for the diagnosis of genui-ne stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 97: 251-59, 1990
  10. Meyer S, De Grandi P, Schimidt N, Sanseni W, Spinoza JP: Urodynamic parameters in pati-ents with slight and severe genuine stress inconti-nence: Is the stress profile useful? Neurourol Urodynam. 13: 21-28, 1994
  11. Lose G: Urethral pressure measurement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (suppl) 166:39-42, 1997
  12. Sultana CJ: Urethral closure pressure and leak-point pressure in incontinent women. Obstet Gy-necol. 86: 839-42, 1995
  13. Bump RC, Coates KW, Cundiff GW, et al: Di-agnosing intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: compa-ring urethral closure pressure, urethral axis, and valsalva leak point pressures. Am J Obstet Gyne-col. 177: 303-10, 1997
  14. Meyer S, Bachelard O, De Grandi P: Do blad-der neck mobility and urethral sphincter function differ during pregnancy compared with during the non-pregnant state? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 9: 397-404, 1998
  15. McGuire EJ: Diagnosis and treatment of intrin-sic sphincter deficiency. Int J Urol. 1: 7-10 (2 Suppl.), 1995
  16. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J, et al: Clinical