Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2003 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of urinary tract infections with respect of clinical and laboratory findings

Üriner sistem enfeksiyonlarının klinik ve laboratuvar bulguları açısından değerlendirilmesi

Pages
87–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Disuria and pollakiuria are the only symptoms that give statistically significant results to predict positive culture results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Urinary tract infections are second mast frequent community infections after respiratory tract infections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 180 patients who applied to our clinic for urinary tract symptoms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Disuria and pollakiuria are the only symptoms that give statistically significant results to predict positive culture results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Penisilinler · Sefalosporinler · Anti-bakteriyel ajanlar

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infections are second mast frequent community infections after respiratory tract infections. Prevalence and clinical consequences of the infections show differences in different populations. In the epidemiology of the infections, some major predisposition factors are discussed such as sex, age, urinary tract abnormalities or symptoms of the infection. In this study we aimed to detect the antibiotic sensitivity profile of the urinary tract infection causing bacteria in our district and find out the cut-off values of laboratory and clinical findings in predicting positive urine culture results. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 180 patients who applied to our clinic for urinary tract symptoms. Medical history and physical examination findings, clinical laboratory examinations and urine culture results were evaluated. A full-automated urinalysis system, which uses flowcytometric analysis of the particles in the urine, Sysmex UF-100 (Sysmex Corporation, Japan), was used to standardize the analysis results. Results were reported as number per (J.1 or HPF (high power field). Samples were collected in the morning hours; if this was not possible, urine samples were collected after 4 hours of holding back. Urine cultures were evaluated after 48 hours of incubation using 5% blood agar and EMB agar (Oxoid, UK). Results: Mean ages of the patients were 52,9±17,9 (mean±SD) for men and 44,04±17,9 (mean±SD) for women. There was no difference in isolation of bacterial from men and women (p>0.05). The following bacteria were isolated and reported from the urine cultures of 117 patients: E. coli (66,2%), Klebsiella sp (14,6%), Streptococcus sp (7,9%), Enterococcus sp (4,5%), Pseudomonas (3,4%) and Proteus sp (3,4%). Aminoglycosides are the most effective group in E. coli and in Klebsiella cultures, and augmented penicillin, 3rd generation cephalosporins and quinolos are the most effective groups in Streptococcus species. It did not seem possible to predict the result of the urine culture according to symptoms of the patients and physical examination findings (p>0.05). Parameters of the urinalysis from 117 culture positive patients were compared with that of 63 culture positive patients. Cut-off values for culture positive results for leukocyte, erythrocyte, the number of bacteria and urine pH were $geq$ 23$mu$l, $geq$ 19$mu$l, 4293 $mu$l and $geq$ 6,5 respectively. Conclusion: We detected increased resistance urinary tract microorganisms to antibiotics in general. Twenty-three or more leukocytes in per $mu$I of urine is found to be the cut-off value to predict the urinary culture outcome. Disuria and pollakiuria are the only symptoms that give statistically significant results to predict positive culture results.

Özet

Bu çalışmada bölgemizde üriner sistem enfeksiyonuna neden olan bakterilerin antibiyotik duyarlılık profilini tespit etmek, laboratuar ve klinik bulguların kültür pozitifliği açısından kestirim değerinin araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Haziran 2000-Ağustos 2001 tarihleri arasında üriner sistem şikayetleri ile başvuran 180 hastanın retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Hastalara ait anamnez ve fizik muayene bulguları, klinik laboratuar değerlendirmeleri, idrar kültürü sonuçlan değerlendirilmiştir. İdrar kültürlerinde üreme tespit edilen 117 hastada rastlanan bakteriler sıklık sırasına göre E. coli (%66.2), Klebsiella sp. (%14,6), Streptokok (%7,9), Enterokoklar (%4,5), Pseudomonas (%3,4) ve Proteus türleri (%3.4) olmuştur. E.coli'nin ve Klebsiella sp.'in antibiyogramında aminoglikozitler en etkili antibiyotik grubu ve Streptokok sp.'in antibiyogramında augmente penisilinler, 3. kuşak sefalosporinler ve kinolon türevleri en etkili antibiyotik grupları olarak tespit edilmiştir. İdrar kültüründe üreme tespit edilen 117 hastanın idrar analizi parametreleri de üreme tespit edilmeyen 63 hastanın aynı parametreleri karşılaştırılmıştır. İdrardaki lokosıt, eritrosit, bakteri sayısı ve pH gibi parametrelerde kültür pozitifliği yönünden kestirim değerleri sırası ile $geq$ 23$mu$l, $geq$ 19$mu$l, 4293 $mu$l ve $geq$ 6,5 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bölgemizde, üriner sistem bakterilerinde genel olarak antibiyotiklere yüksek rezistans tespit edilmiştir. İdrardaki >23 lökosit / $mu$l değeri kültürde üreme tespit edilebileceğini gösterebilmesi yönünden kestirim değeri olarak bulunmuştur. Dizüri ve pollakiüri pozitif kültür sonuçlarını predikte etmede istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAMLI, M. M., DİNÇEL, Ç., KARALAR, M., SARGIN, R., AKTEPE, O., ALTINDIŞ, M. (2003). Evaluation of urinary tract infections with respect of clinical and laboratory findings. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 87–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/328926

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Boscia JA, Levison ME, Abrutyn E: Correlation of pyuria and bacteriuria in elderly ambulatory women. Ann Intern Med. 110: 404-405, 1989 2- Pezzlo M: Detection of urinary tract infections by rapid methods. Clin Microbiol Rev 1:268-288, 1988 3- Hooton TM, Stamm WE: Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicate urinary tract infection. Infect DisClin North Am 11: 551-581, 1997 4- Koneman EW, Allen SD, William MJ, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC (eds): Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 136-147, 1997 5- Sobel JD, Kaye D: Urinary tract infections. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds), Prin-ciples and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed.Pennsylvania: Chuchill Livingstone 773-805, 2000 6- Baron EJ, Finegold SM (eds): Diagnostic Microbiology. 8th ed. Pennsylvania: Mosby 253-262, 1990 7- Stamm WE, Hooton TM: Management of urina-ry tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med. 329: 1328-1334, 1993 8- Winstanley TG, Limb DI, Eggington R, Hancock F: A 10 year survey of the antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract isolates in the UK: The Microbe Base Project. J Antimicrob Chemother. 40:591-594, 1997 9- Gruneberg RN: Changes in urinary pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivities, 1971-1992. JAntimicrob Chemother. 33(suppl A):1-8, 1994 10- Alon U, Davidai G, Berant M, Merzbach D: Five-year survey of changing patterns of susceptibility of bacterial uropathogens to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 31:126-128, 1987 11- Maartens G, Oliver SP: Antibiotic resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infection. S Afr Med J. 84:600-602, 1994 12- Gupta K, Scholes D, Stamm WE: Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. JAMA. 281:736-738, 1999 13- Hooton TM, Winter C, Tiu F, Stamm WE: Randomized comparative trial and cost analysis of 3-day antimicrobial regimens for treatment of acute cystitis in women. JAMA. 273:41-43,1995 14- Spencer RC, Moseley DJ, Greensmith MJ: Nitrofurantion modified release versus trimethoprim or co-trimoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in general practice. J Antimcrob Chemother. 33 (suppl A): 121-129, 1994 15- Turindge J: Epidemiology of quinolone resistance. Eastern hemisphere. Drugs. 49 (suppl 2): 43-47, 1995 16- Kapoor H, Aggarwal P: Resistance to quinolones in pathogens causing urinary tract infections. J Commun Dis. 29:263