Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Our results in 108 renal units

Perkütan nefrolitotomi: 108 böbrek hastasındaki sonuçlarımız

Pages
220–224
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In view of these results, PNL appears as an effective and safe treatment modality for renal calculi.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, we reviewed the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in 108 renal units (RU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between March 2005 and January 2006, 108 percutaneous nephrolithotomies (PNL) were done in 50 adult male, 45 adult female and 8 children with a mean age of 42.8 (5-75). 43 right, 65 left kidneys were involved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In view of these results, PNL appears as an effective and safe treatment modality for renal calculi.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Böbrek taşı · Üriner taş · Nefrolitiyaz

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we reviewed the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in 108 renal units (RU). Materials and Methods: Between March 2005 and January 2006, 108 percutaneous nephrolithotomies (PNL) were done in 50 adult male, 45 adult female and 8 children with a mean age of 42.8 (5-75). 43 right, 65 left kidneys were involved. Age limit was taken 17 years in pediatric patients. Stone burden was calculated by multiplying lengths in millimeters of two edges of stones on direct urinary system graphy. All PNLs were done under general anesthesia with single dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: Average stone size was calculated as 500.36 mm<sup>2</sup> (between 84 and 2000). The stone free rate was 73% (79/108). When residual fragments less than 4 mm were defined as "insignificant", success rate raised to 94 % (101/108). Separate analysis of 5 renal units with Staghorn calculi revealed 80% (4/5) complete stone clearance and 100% (5/5) success rate with insignificant residuals. The corresponding success rates in 18 lower pole calyx calculi were 89% (16/18) and 94%, respectively. A single session PNL was successful in 103 (95%) RUs, but repeat PNL/ESWL was necessary in the remaining 5 RU. Postoperative hemorrhage requiring transfusion was encountered in 7 (6 %) patients. Renal vascular angiography and selective embolization were performed in 1 patient because of long lasting bleeding from urinary tract. Mean operative time was calculated as 77.4 minutes (10-225 min). Double J stent as a diversion was used in 19 patients. Mean postoperative hospitalization day was calculated as 3.8 days (1-16 days). Supracostal access was done in 11 patients. In one patient, postoperative plevral effusion was seen and treated conservatively. Eleven patients were treated for urinary tract infection postoperatively. Conclusion: In view of these results, PNL appears as an effective and safe treatment modality for renal calculi.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kliniğimizde 108 böbrek hastasına yapılan perkütan nefrolitotomi'ye (PNL) ilişkin sonuçlar sunulmaktadır. Mart 2005 ile Ocak 2006 tarihleri arasında ortalama yaşı 42.8 (5-75) olan 50 erişkin erkek, 45 erişkin kadın ve 8 çocuk, toplam 108 böbrek hastasına PNL uygulandı. İşlem 103 olguda tek seans olmak üzere, 43 sağ ve 65 sol böbreğe yapıldı. Ortalama taş yükü 500.36 mm 2 olarak hesaplandı (84 ile 2000 arasında). Taşsızlık oranı %73 (79/108) olarak bulundu, 4 mm'den küçük rezidiv taşlar klinik olarak önemsiz kabul edildiğinde ise başarı %94'e (101/108) ulaşmakta idi. Böbrek hastalarının 103'ünde (%95) tek seans PNL ile başarı sağlanırken, 3'ünde birden fazla PNL ve 2'sinde ESWL gerekti. Erken dönemde 7 hastada (%6) transfüzyon gerektiren kanama oldu. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 77,4 dakika (10-225 dakika) olarak hesaplandı. Ameliyat sonunda 19 hastaya diversiyon olarak çift J stent yerleştirildi. Ameliyat sonrası ortalama yatış süresi 3.8 gündü (1-16). Hastaların 11'inde suprakostal giriş uygulandı ve birinde ameliyat sonrası plevral effüzyon izlendi. Hasta konservatif izlenerek tedavi edildi. Ameliyat sonrası dönemde idrar yolu enfeksiyonu 11 hastada izlendi ve uygun antibiyotik ile tedavi edildi. Sunulan sonuçlar PNL'nin böbrek taşlarının girişimsel tedavisinde başarılı ve güvenli olduğunu göstermektedir. Tüpsüz PNL, ameliyat sonrası ağrı ve aneljezik ihtiyacını ve hastanede kalış süresini, morbidite ve istenmeyen yan etki oranlarını artırmadan, belirgin bir şekilde azaltmaktadır. PNL uygulaması ülkemizde de alt yapısı uygun olan merkezlerde yaygınlaşmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOFİKERİM, M., DEMİRCİ, D., EKMEKÇİOĞLU, O., GÜLER, G., ERŞEKERCİ, E., KARACAGİL, M. (2006). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Our results in 108 renal units. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 220–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/328766

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Mor Y, Elmastry YET, Kellet MJ: The role of percuta-neous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Urol. 158: 1319, 1997
  2. Segura JW: Percutaneous Management. Campell’s Uro-logy (Walsh P, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr, ed). Sixth edition. Philadephia, Saunders. Vol.3, 2183-2193, 1992
  3. Fernstrom I and Johansson B: Percutaneous pyelolit-hotomy. Scand. J Urol. Nephrol. 10: 257-259, 1976
  4. Wolf JS, Clayman RV: Percutaneous nephrolitotomy: What is its role in 1997? Urol Clin North Am. 24: 43, 1997
  5. Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V, et al: PCNL: Analysis of 500 consecutive cases. Urol. Radiol. 8: 61-66, 1986
  6. Dushinski JW, Lingeman JE: Simultaneous Bi-lateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 158: 2065-68, 1997
  7. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B: Management of lo-wer pole nephrolithiasis: A critical analysis. J Urol. 151: 663-667, 1994
  8. Motola JA, Smith AD: Therapeutic options for the ma-nagement of upper tract calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 17: 191-206, 1990
  9. Drach GW, Dretler S, Fair W, et al: Report of the Uni-ted States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wa-ve lithotripsy. J Urol. 135: 1127-33, 1986
  10. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al: Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolitho-tomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol. 166: 2072-80, 2001
  11. Müslümanoğlu AY, Tefekli A, Taş A ve ark: Öğrenme eğrisinde ilk 100 perkütan nefrolitotomi olgusunun anali-zi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi. 30: 339-347, 2004
  12. Assimos DG: Treatment options for Staghorn calculi. AUA Uptade Series. Lesson 1, vol. XXI, 2002
  13. Tekin İ, Tekgül S, Bakkaloğlu M: Results of extractor-poreal shock wave lithotripsy in children, using the Dor-nier MPL 9000 lithotriptor. J Ped Surg. 33: 1257, 1998
  14. Şahin A, Tekgül S, Erdem E, et al: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older children. J Ped Surg. 35: 1336-1338, 2000
  15. Al-Shammari AM, Al-Otaibi K, Leonard MP: Percu-taneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric population. J Urol. 162: 1721- 4, 1999
  16. Sofikerim M, Şahin A, Akdoğan B ve ark: Perkütan Nefrolitotomi: 500 Renal Ünitedeki Sonuçlarımız. Ürolo-ji Bülteni. 13, 2002
  17. Sofikerim M, Şahin A, Taftachi AR ve ark: Perkütan nefrolitotomi: Postoperatif dönemde kanama nedeniyle renal anjiyografi yapılan olgular. Türk Üroloji Dergisi. 28: 206-8, 2002
  18. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al: A prospecti-ve randomized comparison of type of neph