Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Laparoscopic management of üreteral strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment

Endoskopik tedaviden yarar görmeyen üreter darlıklarının laparoskopik tedavisi

Pages
212–219
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of ureteral pathologies is a promising option and can be applied effectively in the management ureteral strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment alternatives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Laparoscopic management of ureteric pathologies such as vesicoureteral reflux, retroperitoneal fibrosis, ureteropelvic obstruction has been proved to be highly effective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between August 2003 and May 2005, nine patients, with a history of failed endoscopic management of urethral strictures, underwent laparoscopic surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of ureteral pathologies is a promising option and can be applied effectively in the management ureteral strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment alternatives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Laparoskopi · Üreter tıkanması · Tedavi başarısızlığı

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic management of ureteric pathologies such as vesicoureteral reflux, retroperitoneal fibrosis, ureteropelvic obstruction has been proved to be highly effective. We evaluated the role of laparoscopy in the management of distal ureteral strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment. We describe the laparoscopic technique and present our initial experience in regard to feasibility, safety and short-term results. Materials and Methods: Between August 2003 and May 2005, nine patients, with a history of failed endoscopic management of urethral strictures, underwent laparoscopic surgery. There were 2 men and 7 women. Their median age was 55.5 (23-78) years. Patients were preoperatively evaluated with excretory urography, ultrasonography, retrograde ureterography, and computerized tomography. The stricture was located on the right ureter in 7 and on the left side in 2 patients. The etiologies of ureteral strictures were ureteroscopic laser therapy for ureteral tumor (n: 1), recurrent stone disease with endoscopic stone manipulations (n: 1), retroperitoneal fibrosis (n: 1), chronic appendicitis (n: 1), iatrogenic ureteral injury during pelvic operations (n: 2), pelvic radiotherapy (n: 1), chronic infection (n: 1) and retrocaval ureter (n: 1). Obstruction site was distal ureter in 7 patients and abdominal ureter in two patients. Obstructed ureter length varied from 2 to 6 cm and median stricture length was 3.0 cm. For temporary relief of obstruction two patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy catheter and seven patients had pig-tail stent. Results: Laparoscopic reconstructive ureteral surgery, including psoas hitch with Boari flap ureteroneocystotomy in 3 patients, psoas hitch ureteroneocystotomy in 5 patients, and ureteroureterostomy in one patient, was performed without need for open conversion. No intraoperative complication was observed. Postoperatively, prolonged ileus, that resolved spontaneously, was encountered in one patient. Median operation time was 197 (range: 75-228) minutes. The average blood loss was 263 cc (range: 140-450). Oral intake and ambulation started at the second day postoperatively. After a mean follow-up of 11 (range: 7-12) months, radiological imaging studies showed a good relief of obstruction or no hydronephrosis. No recurrence was observed. No patient complained of pain, urinary tract infections or obstruction during this follow-up. Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of ureteral pathologies is a promising option and can be applied effectively in the management ureteral strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment alternatives.

Özet

Günümüzde laparoskopik cerrahi üreteropelvik bileşke darlığı, üreter taşları, retroperitoneal fibrozis tedavisinde başarı ile uygulanmaktadır. Çalışmamızda, endoskopik tedaviden fayda bulmayan üreter darlıklarının tedavisinde laparoskopinin yerini ve güvenirliğini araştırdık, kısa dönemdeki ilk deneyimlerimizi bildirdik. Kliniğimizde Ağustos 2003 ve Mayıs 2005 tarihleri arasında, üreter darlığının daha önceki endoskopik tedavisi başarısız olmuş, ortalama yaşı 55,5 (23-78) olan, dokuz hasta (2 erkek, 7 kadın) laparoskopik olarak ameliyat edildi. Darlık, 7 hastada sağ üreterde, 2 hastada ise sol üreterdeydi. Hastalar ameliyat öncesi intravenöz ürogafi, retrograd üretero-piyelografi, ultrasonografi ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile incelendi. Hastaların 3'üne psoas hitch ve Boari flap üreteroneosistosomi, 5'ine psoas hitch üreteroneosistosomi ve 1'ine üreteroüreterostomi yapıldı. Tüm hastalarda laparoskopik üreter onarımı açık cerrahiye geçilmeden tamamlanabildi. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 197 (75-228) dakika ve ortalama kan kaybı 263 (140-450) cc olarak kaydedildi. Ameliyat sırasında istenmeyen yan etki gözlenmedi. Ameliyat sonrası bir olguda uzun süren bir ileus tablosu görüldü. Hastalar ameliyat sonrası ikinci günde mobilize edilerek ağızdan besin alınımına geçildi. Ameliyat sonrası ortalama 11 aylık takip süresi sonrası hastalarda ağrı ve enfeksiyon saptanmadı. Yapılan radyolojik kontrollerde obstrüksiyon bulgusu saptanmadı. Üreter patolojilerinin laparoskopik tedavisinin ilk sonuçlarının umut verici olduğu görülmektedir. Bulgularımız endoskopik tedavinin başarısız olduğu üreter darlıklarında da laparoskopinin başarı ile uygulanabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖZEN, A. S., TEBER, D., ATEŞ, M., TEFEKLİ, A., RASSWEILER, J. J. (2006). Laparoscopic management of üreteral strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 212–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/328765

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Yohannes P, Gershbaum D, Rotariu PE, Smith AD, Lee BR: Management of ureteral stricture disease during laparoscopic ureteroneocystomy. J Endourol, 15: 839-843 2001
  2. Kaouk JH and Gill IS: Laparoscopic Reconstructive Urology. J Urol, 170: 1070-1078, 2003
  3. Gerspach JM, Schulam PG and Kavoussi R: Laparos-copy as applied to the upper urinary tract. AUA update series, XVI: 2003
  4. Gupta NP, Goel R, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, A-ron M, Kumar R, Ansari MS: Should retroperitoneos-copic nephrectomy be the standard of care for benign non-functioning kidneys: An outcome analysis based on experience of 449 cases in 5 year period. J Urol 172: 1411-1413, 2004
  5. Streem SB, Franke JJ and Smith JA: Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In Campbell's Urology, 7th ed Edited by PC Walsh, AD Retik, ED Vaughan Jr, et al: Philadelphia, WB Saunders, vol 3 chapt 13, 2327, 2003
  6. Stief CG, Jonas U, Petry KU, Sohn C, Bektas H, Klempnauer J, Chavan A, Galanski M, Montorsi F: Ureteric reconstruction. BJU int, 91: 138-142, 2003
  7. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D, Seemann O, Frede T: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol, 14: 75-82, 2004
  8. Nezhat C and Nezhat F: Laparoscopic repair of ureter resected during operative laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol, 80: 543-544, 1992
  9. Fergany A, Gill IS, Abdel-Samee A, Kaouk J, Mera-ney A, Sung G: Laparoscopic bladder flap ureteral re-implantation: Survival porcine study. J Urol, 166: 1920-1923, 2001
  10. Fugita OE, Dinlenc C, Kavoussi L: The laparoscopic Boari flap. J Urol, 166: 51-53, 2001
  11. Modi P, Goel R and Dodiya S: Laparoscopic ureterone-ocystostomy for distal ureteral injuries. Urology, 66: 751-753, 2005
  12. Nezhat CH, Malik S, Nezhat F, Nezhat C: Laparosco-pic ureteroneocystostomy and vesicopsoas hitch for in-filtrative endometriosis. JSLS, 8: 3-7, 2004
  13. Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Al-ken P: Retroperitoneoscopy: Experience with 200 cases. J Urol, 160: 1265-1269, 1998
  14. Baba S, Oya M, Miyahara M, Deguchi N, Tazaki H: Laparoscopic surgical correction of circumcaval ureter. Urology, 44: 122-126, 1994
  15. Ostrezinski A, Radolinski B, Ostrzenska KM: A revi-ew of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Obs-tet Gynecol Surv, 58: 794-799, 2003
  16. Chang R and Marshall FF: Management of ureterosco-pic injuries. J Urol, 137: 1132-1135, 1987
  17. Teber D, Egey A, Gözen AS and Rassweiler J: Ureteral injuries Diagnostic and treatment algorithm.