Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2010 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

Retrocaval üreter tedavisi için transperitoneal laparoskopik üreteroüreterostomi: Ardışık 3 vakanın analizi

Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for the treatment of retrocaval ureter: Analysis of 3 consecutive cases

Pages
309–313
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery should be considered as the first choice of treatment for retrocaval ureter due to cosmetic advantages and early recovery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this report was to demonstrate the operative technique and assess outcomes of laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy on 3 consecutive cases diagnosed with retrocaval ureter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients were successfully treated with transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique with a mean operative time of 118 min.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery should be considered as the first choice of treatment for retrocaval ureter due to cosmetic advantages and early recovery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this report was to demonstrate the operative technique and assess outcomes of laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy on 3 consecutive cases diagnosed with retrocaval ureter. The presenting symptom of these cases was recurrent right flank pain and the diagnosis was established by intravenous urography. All patients were successfully treated with transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique with a mean operative time of 118 min. The mean blood loss was 76 cc and hospital stay 3.3 days. The minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery should be considered as the first choice of treatment for retrocaval ureter due to cosmetic advantages and early recovery.

Özet

Bu yazının amacı, 3 ardışık retrokaval üreter olgusunda uygulanan laparoskopik üreteroüreterostominin cerrahi tekniğini göstermek ve sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Hastaların temel şikayeti tekrarlayan sağ yan ağrısı idi ve tanı ürografi ile konuldu. Tüm hastalar transperitoneal laparoskopik üreteroüreterostomi ile intrakorporal sütür tekniği kullanılarak ortalama 118 dk operasyon süresi ile tedavi edildi. Ortalama kan kaybı 76 cc ve hastanede kalış süresi 3.3 gün olarak saptandı. Retrokaval üreter tedavisinde, kozmetik avantajları ve erken iyileşme süresi nedeniyle, minimal invazif laparoskopik yaklaşım ilk tedavi seçeneği olarak düşünülmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞANLI, Ö., ÖNOL, F. F., TEFİK, T., ŞİMŞEK, A., NAGHİYEV, R., ÖNOL, Ş. Y. (2010). Retrocaval üreter tedavisi için transperitoneal laparoskopik üreteroüreterostomi: Ardışık 3 vakanın analizi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 309–313. https://ajindex.com/articles/328691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Simforoosh N, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Tabibi A. Laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for retrocaval ureter without excision of the retrocaval segment: first report of 6 cases. J Urol 2006
  2. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00269-2 2. Johansson NT, Nilsson SV, Scherston T, Schvarz W, Weiland PO. Retrocaval ureter: a report of a case and short review of the literature. Scand J Nephrol 1969
  3. doi:10.3109/00365596909135381 PMid:5351896 3. Considine J. Retrocaval ureter. A review of the literature with a report on two new cases followed for fifteen years and two years respectively. Br J Urol. 1966
  4. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1966.tb09728.x 4. Thomas HS, Stevan BS, Stephen YN. Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In: Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia: Saunders
  5. p. 1253-4. 5. Baba S, Oya M, Miyahara M, Deguchi N, Tazaki H. Laparoscopic surgical correction of circumcaval ureter. Urology 1994
  6. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80023-5 6. Ishitoya S, Okubo K, Arai Y. Laparoscopic ureterolysis for retrocaval ureter. Br J Urol 1996
  7. PMid:8653298 7. Polascik TJ, Chen RN. Laparoscopic ureterouretrostomy for retrocaval ureter. J Urol 1998
  8. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63053-2 8. Matsuda T, Yasumoto R, Tsujino T. Laparoscopic treatment of a retrocaval ureter. Eur Urol 1996
  9. PMid:8821702 9. Salomon L, Hoznek A, Balian C, Gasman D, Chopin DK, Abbou CC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy of a retrocaval ureter. BJU Int 1999
  10. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00183.x 10. Ramalingham M, Selvarajan K. Laparoscopic transperitoneal repair of retrocaval ureter: report of two cases. J Endourol 2003
  11. doi:10.1089/08927790360587397 PMid:12689400 11. Chung BI, Gill IS. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty of a retrocaval ureter: case report and review of the literature. Eur Urol 2008
  12. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.010 PMid:18805629 12. Dogan HS, Oktay B, Vuruskan H, Yavascaoglu I. Treatment of retrocaval ureter by pure laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy: experience on 4 patients. Urology 2010
  13. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.040 PMid:19963241 13. Xu DF, Yao YC, Ren JZ, Liu YS, Gao Y, Che JP, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomyfor retrocaval ureter: report of 7 cases. Urology 2009
  14. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.097 PMid:19716586 14. Mugiya S, Suzuki K, Ohhira T, Un-No T, Takayama T, Fujita K. Retroperitoneoscopic treatment of a retrocaval