Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2001 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of fistula formation after hypospadias surgery

Hipospadiyas onarımı sonrası gelişen fistüllerin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
328–331
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been thought that the use of monofilament sutures and choosing the simplest technique according to the place of hypospadic meatus will increase the success rate of hypospadias surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between fistula formation and urethra! meatus, patient's age and the suture material used during surgery was evaluated in the patients who underwent hypospadias repair in our department between July 1995 and June 2000.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One hundred-twenty-four patients with age at the time of surgery ranged from 7 months to 32 years underwent hypospadias repair.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been thought that the use of monofilament sutures and choosing the simplest technique according to the place of hypospadic meatus will increase the success rate of hypospadias surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fistül · Hipospadyas · Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar

Abstract

The relationship between fistula formation and urethra! meatus, patient's age and the suture material used during surgery was evaluated in the patients who underwent hypospadias repair in our department between July 1995 and June 2000. One hundred-twenty-four patients with age at the time of surgery ranged from 7 months to 32 years underwent hypospadias repair. Hundred of the patients were at the age of 15 or under (80.6%) and 24 of them were over 16 years of age (19.4%). In 25 patients (20.2%) urethral defect was in the posterior, in 37 (29.8%) in the middle and in 62 (50%) in the anterior in location. Twenty-two patients underwent MAGPI repair, 68 underwent Mathieu repair, 31 underwent transverse island flap, 1 underwent Dennis Brown repair and 2 patients underwent repair with graft insertion. In 77 of the patients; polyglactine, in 33 of the patients; polydioxanone and in 14 of the patients; chromic surgical gut were used. The follow-up of the patients was between 4 to 50 months (mean 20). In 30 of the patients, fistula had developed. Fistula was seen in the posterior in 7 (5.6%), in the middle in 9 (7.3%) and in the anterior in 14 (11.3%) of the patients. In 27 patients who had fistulas polyglactine and in 3 patients polydioxanone had been used as a suture material. Out of 27 patients with fistula after polyglactine had been used urethral meatus was in the anterior in 13 (43.3%), in the middle in 8 (26.6%) and in the posterior in 6 (20%) patients. Out of 3 patients with fistula after polydioxanone had been used meatus was in the anterior in 1 (3.3%), in the middle in 1 (3.3%) and in the posterior in 1 (3.3%) patient. In 6 of 22 patients after MAGPI repair, in 16 of 68 patients after Mathieu repair and in 8 of 31 patients after transverse island flap repair fistula had seen. These results have shown that the rate of fistula formation was higher after anterior hypospadias repair without any correlation with age. There were no significant differences between the operation techniques in the postoperative fistula formation. However, the rate of fistula formation was relatively low in patients which polydioxanone have been used. It has been thought that the use of monofilament sutures and choosing the simplest technique according to the place of hypospadic meatus will increase the success rate of hypospadias surgery.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı kliniğimizde 1995-2000 yılları arasında yapılan hipospadiyas onarımlarından sonra gelişen fistüllerin hipospadik meanın yerleşimi, hastanın yaşı ve kullanılan sütür materyali ile ilişkisini retrospektif olarak incelemektir. Yaşları 7 ay ile 32 yıl arasında değişen 124 hastaya hipospadiyas onarımı uygulandı. Hastaların 100'ü 15 yaş ve altında (%80.6), 24'ü 16 yaş ve üzerinde (%19.4) idi. Hastaların 25'inde (%20.2) hipospadik mea penisin posteriyorunda, 37'sinde (%29.8) ortada, 62'sinde (%50) anteriorda idi. Hastaların 22'sine MAGPI, 68'ine Mathieu, 31'ine transvers island flap, 1'ine Dennis Brown, 2'sine greftle onarım ameliyatları uygulandı. Vakaların 77'sinde poliglaktin, 33'ünde polidiyoksanon, 14'ünde katgüt sütür materyali olarak kullanıldı. Hastaların takip süresi 4-50 ay (20 ay ört.) arasında değişmekteydi. Hastaların 30'unda (%24.2) fistül geliştiği gözlendi. Bunlardan 7'si (%5.6) posteriyor, 9'u (%7.3) orta, 14'ü (%11.3) anterior hipospadyas onarımı sonrası gözlendi. Fistül gelişen 30 vakanın 27'sinde poliglaktin, 3'ünde polidiyoksanon kullanılmıştır. Poliglaktin kullanıldıktan sonra fistül gelişen 27 (%21.7) vakanın 13'ünde (%43.3) mea anterior, 8'inde (%26.6) orta, 6'sınde (%20) ise posteriyor yerleşimliydi. Polidiyoksanon kullanıldıktan sonra fistül gelişen 3 (%2.4) vakanın 1'inde (%3.3) mea anterior, 1'inde (%3.3) orta, 1'inde (%3.3) posteriyor yerleşimliydi. MAGPI yapılan 22 hastanın 6'sında (%27.2), Mathieu yapılan 68 hastanın 16'sında (%23.5), transvers island flap yapılan 31 hastanın 8'inde (%25.8) fistül geliştiği saptanmıştır. Bu sonuçlar göstermiştir ki postoperatif fistül oluşumuna anterior hipospadiyas onarımlarından sonra daha sık rastlanmaktadır, bizim serimizde bunun yaşla bağlantısı gösterilememiştir.Ameliyat teknikleri arasında postoperatif fistül gelişimi açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunmamaktadır. Ancak özellikle polidiyoksanon sütür materyali kullanıldığında fıstül gelişme oranı oldukça düşüktür. Bu yüzden hipospadiyas cerrahisinde monofilaman sütür materyallerinin kullanılmasının ve hipospadik meanın lokalizasyonuna göre en basit operasyon tekniğinin seçilmesinin başarı oranını yükselteceği kanısındayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIDOĞAN, İ. A., BAYAZIT, Y., ÜNSAL, İ., SATAR, N., DORAN, Ş. (2001). Evaluation of fistula formation after hypospadias surgery. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 328–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/328595

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Czeizel A, Toth J: Correlation between the birth prevalence of isolated hypospadias and parental subfertility. Teratology 41: 167, 1990
  2. Sheldon CA, Duckett JW: Hypospadias: Mana-gement principles in pediatric urology. Pediatr Clin North Am 34: 1259, 1987 3- Retik AB, Keating M, Mandel J: Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 15: 223-236, 1988
  3. Duckett JW, Snyder HM: III. Meatal advance-ment and glanuloplasty hypospadias repair after 1000 cases: Avoidance of meatal stenosis and regression. J Urol 147: 665-669, 1992
  4. Teague JL, Roth DR, Gonzales ET: Repair of hypospadias complications using the meatal ba-sed flap urethroplasty. J Urol 151: 470-472, 1994 6- Gibbons MD, Gonzales ET Jr: The subcoronal meatus. J Urol 130: 739, 1983 7- Johnson HW, Coleman GV, McLoughlin MG: Comparison of microscopic and macroscopic repair in rabbit uterthral fistulae. Invest Urol 19: 29-30, 1981
  5. Stock JA, Scherz HC, Kaplan GW: Distal hy-pospadias. Urol Clin North Am 22: 131-138, 1995
  6. DiSandro M, Palmer JM: Stricture incidence related to suture material in hypospadias surgery. J Pediatr Surg 31(7): 881-884, 1996
  7. Ulman I, Erikçi U, Avanoğlu A, et al: The ef-fect of suturing technique and material on comp-lication rate following hypospadias repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 7: 156-157, 1997
  8. Dewan PA, Dineen MD, Winkle D. et al: Hy-pospadias: Duckett pedicle tube urethroplasty. Eur Urol 20: 39-42, 1991
  9. Uygur MC, Erol D, Germiyanoğlu C: Lessons from 197 Mathieu hypospadias repairs performed at a single institution. Pediatr Surg Int 14: 192-194, 1998
  10. Zaontz Mr: Nuances of hypospadias. Problems in Urology 4: 705-717, 1990
  11. Latifoğlu O, Yavuzer R, Anal S, Çavuşoğlu T, Atabay K: Surgical treatment of urethral fistulas following hypaspadias repair. Ann Plast Surg 44 (4): 381-386, 2000.