Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2005 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: Our first experiences

Laparoskopik ekstraperitoneal radikal prostatektomi: İlk deneyimlerimiz

Pages
384–388
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long and gradual learning curve of this procedure is its main disadvantage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively new and contemporary approach in the surgical management of localized prostate cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report our preliminary results after 6 procedures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long and gradual learning curve of this procedure is its main disadvantage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Prostat neoplazmları · Laparoskopi · Prostatektomi

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively new and contemporary approach in the surgical management of localized prostate cancer. We report our preliminary results after 6 procedures. Materials and Methods: We performed laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (LERP) in 6 patients between January and June in 2004. Clinical stage, serum PSA, Gleason score, operating time, surgical and medical complications, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay and catheterization times were recorded. The pathologic stage (1997 TNM classification), status of surgical margins and continence were noted. Results: There was no conversion and reintervention. The mean operation time was 320 minutes. The mean blood loss was 178.3 ml. The mean hospital stay was 4.5 days. There were no major complications. Subileus occurred in one patient and resolved spontaneously. The mean catheterization time was 13.3 days. 2 of 6 patients had positive surgical margins at the urethra. 4 of 6 patients were continent after a median followup period of 3 months. Conclusion: LERP as a minimally invasive procedure seems to offer the same early oncological and surgical results as conventional open radical prostatectomy. Long and gradual learning curve of this procedure is its main disadvantage.

Özet

Laparoskopik radikal prostatektomi lokalize prostat kanserinin cerrahi yolla tedavisinde yeni ve güncel bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışmada 6 olgunun erken dönem sonuçlarını bildirdik. Ocak-Haziran 2004 tarihleri arasında 6 hastaya laparoskopik ekstroperitoneal radikal prostatektomi (LERP) uyguladık. Klinik evre, serum PSA, biyopsi Gleason skoru, operasyon süresi, istenmeyen cerrahi ve medikal yan etkiler, kan kaybı, transfüzyon oranı, hastanede kalma ve kateterizasyon süreleri belirlendi. Patolojik evre (1997 TNM sınıflandırması), cerrahi sınır ve kontinans durumu değerlendirildi. Hiçbir hastada açık cerrahiye geçiş ve tekrar girişim gerekmedi. Ortalama cerrahi süresi 320 dakika; ortalama kan kaybı 178.3 ml; ortalama yatış süresi 4.5 gün olarak belirlendi. İstenmeyen önemli bir yan etki görülmezken, 1 hastada görülen subileus tablosu spontan olarak düzeldi. Ortalama kateterizasyon süresi 13.3 gündü. 6 hastanın 2'sinde üretra sınırında pozitif cerrahi sınır saptandı. 6 hastanın 4'ünde ortalama 3 aylık takipler sonunda kontinansın korunduğu görüldü. LERP geleneksel açık radikal prostatektomiye benzer erken onkolojik ve cerrahi sonuçlar sağlayabilen, minimal invaziv bir yöntem gibi görünmektedir. Bu yöntemin ana dezavantajı uzun süren ve kademeli öğrenme sürecidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKTAY, B., VURUŞKAN, H., YAVAŞÇAOĞLU, İ., KORDAN, Y., ÇALIŞKAN, Z., ÖZTÜRK, M. (2005). Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: Our first experiences. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 384–388. https://ajindex.com/articles/328517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Schuessler WW, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Vancaille TH: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial case report. J Urol, suppl., 147: 246A, abstract 130, 1992
  2. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 50: 854-857, 1997
  3. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Montsouris technique. J Urol 163: 1643-8, 2000
  4. Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 55: 630-6, 2000
  5. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166: 2101-7, 2001
  6. Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P: Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50: 849-53, 1997
  7. Ruiz L, Salomon R, Hoznek A, et al: Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Eur Urol 46: 50-56, 2004
  8. Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, et al: Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 171: 714-6, 2004
  9. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, et al: Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 61: 617-22, 2003
  10. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, et al: Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol 46: 312-20, 2004
  11. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, et al: Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167: 51-6, 2002
  12. Stolzenburg J, Do M, Rabenthal R, et al: Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169: 2066-71, 2003
  13. Guillonneau, B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X and Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am, 28: 189, 2001
  14. Abreu SC, Gill IS, Kaouk JH, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach. J Urol 167: 19, 2002
  15. Fromont P, Guillonneau B, Validire P, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary pathologic evaluation. Urology 60: 661-5, 2002
  16. Rasswei