Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2005 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Endourological treatment modalities in the adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Erişkin üreteropelvik bileşke darlığında endoürolojik tedavi seçenekleri

Pages
88–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we evaluated the advantages, disadvantages, success rates and complications of endourological techniques with the support of the current literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJ obstruction) is the insufficient expulsion of urine from renal pelvis to ureter which is caused by a congenital or acquired pathologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MAG-3 or DTPA renal scintigraphy and rarely Whitaker test are used for the diagnosis of this disease.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we evaluated the advantages, disadvantages, success rates and complications of endourological techniques with the support of the current literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üreter · Pelvis · Üretra hastalıkları

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJ obstruction) is the insufficient expulsion of urine from renal pelvis to ureter which is caused by a congenital or acquired pathologies. MAG-3 or DTPA renal scintigraphy and rarely Whitaker test are used for the diagnosis of this disease. Open, endourologic or laparoscopic techniques can be used for the treatment of the disease. Percutaneous endopyelotomy, cautery balon endopyelotomy, ureteroscopic endopyelotomy or laparoscopic pyeloplasty are the techniques which can be used. Each of these techniques has both advantages and disadvantages. In this review, we evaluated the advantages, disadvantages, success rates and complications of endourological techniques with the support of the current literature.

Özet

Üreteropelvik bileşke darlığı (UPJ darlığı), doğumsal veya edinsel hastalıklar sonucu böbrek pelvisindeki idrarın üretere yetersiz aktarımı olarak tanımlanır. Üreteropelvik darlığın kesin tanısı diüretik MAG-3 veya DTPA böbrek sintigrafısi ile konulur ve nadiren tanıyı kesinleştirmek için Whitaker testi gerekir. Üreteropelvik bileşke darlığı, açık, endoürolojik, veya laparaskopik cerrahi yöntemler ile tedavi edilebilir. Endoürolojik cerrahide, perkütan endopiyelotomi, koterli balon endopiyelotomi, üreteroskopik endopiyelotomi veya laparoskopik piyeloplasti teknikleri kullanılabilir. Her cerrahi tekniğin avantajları ve dezavantajları bulunmaktadır. Bu yazımızda endoürolojik yöntemleri, avantajları, dezavantajları, cerrahi tekniği, başarı oranları ve komplikasyonları açısından, son literatür bilgisi desteğiyle değerlendirdik.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLKER, Y., YAZICI, C. M. (2005). Endourological treatment modalities in the adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 88–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/328396

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Oppenheimer R, Hinman FJ: Ureteral regeneration: Contracture vs. hyperplasia of smooth muscle. J. Urol. 74: 476-484, 1955
  2. Streem SB: Percutaneous Endopyelotomy. Urol. Clin. North Am. 27; 685-693, 2000
  3. Şafak M, Soygür T, Göğüş Ç: Perkütan Endopiyelotomi Deneyimimiz. Türk Üroloji Dergisi: 28: 201-205, 2002
  4. Danuster H, Ackermann KD, Böhlen D, Studer EU: Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Risk factors determine the success rate. J. Urol. 159; 56-61, 1998
  5. Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD: Results of 212 concecutive endopyelotomies: An 8 year follow- up. J. Urol 149: 453-456, 1993
  6. Klestscher BA, Segura JW, Patterson DE: Percutaneous antegrade endoscopic pyelotomy: Review of 50 consecutive cases. J. Urol. 153: 701-793, 1995
  7. Gupta M, Tuncay OL, Smith AD: Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: A 12 year perspective. J. Urol. 151: 934-937, 1994
  8. Cassis NA, Brannen EG, Bush HW et al: Endopyelotomy: Review of results and complications. J. Urol. 146: 1492-1495, 1991
  9. Kuenkel M, Korth K: Endopyelotomy: Long term follow up of 143 patients. J. Endourology 4: 109-116, 1990
  10. Van Cangh PJ, Wilmart JF, Opsomer RJ et al: Long term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelolitotomy. J. Urol. 151: 934-937, 1994
  11. Lam JS, Cooper KL, Grene TD et al: Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 61: 1107-1111, 2003
  12. Hatsuse K, Ono Y, Kinukawa T, el al: Longterm results of endopyeloureterotomy using the transpelvic extraureteral approach. Urology 60: 233-237, 2002
  13. Jabbour ME, Goldfischer ER, Anderson AE, et al: Endopyelotomy failure is associated with reduced transforming growth factor-beta. J.Urol. 160: 1991-1998, 1998
  14. Anidjar M, Meria P, Cochand-Priollet B, et al: Evaluation of optimal stent size after antegra endopyelotomy: An experimental study in the porcine model. Eur. Urol. 32: 245-252, 1997
  15. Knudsen BJ, Cook AJ, Watterson J, et al: Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: Long term results from one institution. Urology. 63 (2): 230-234, 2004
  16. Chandhoke PS, Clayman RV, Stone AM, et al: Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the Acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: Preliminary experience. J Endourol; 7: 45: 1993b
  17. Meretyk I, Meretyk S, Clayman RV: Endopyelotomy: Comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. J. Urol 148: 775-783, 1992
  18. Tunçay S: Retrograt Acu