Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

ESWL, in pediatric patients: Our experience in the renal and ureteral stones

Çocuk hastalarda beden dışından şok dalgalarıyla taş kırma (ESWL): böbrek ve üreter taşlarındaki deneyimlerimiz

Pages
524–528
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As a minimally invasive method, ESWL was found to be safe and effective in the treatment of childhood urinary stone disease

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The aim of the study is to investigate our results with ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy) in 121 children with renal and ureteral stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In last four years, 121 children (125 reno-ureteral units, RUU) with renal or ureteral calculi were treated with ESWL at our department.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As a minimally invasive method, ESWL was found to be safe and effective in the treatment of childhood urinary stone disease
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Litotripsi · Pediatri · Üreter taşı

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study is to investigate our results with ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy) in 121 children with renal and ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: In last four years, 121 children (125 reno-ureteral units, RUU) with renal or ureteral calculi were treated with ESWL at our department. There were 39 girls and 82 boys. The patients&#8217; ages ranged between 1-14 (mean 7.9) years. Stones were localized in calyx (n=75), renal pelvis (n=32) (Stone size 0.8-3.0 (mean 2.2) cm), and ureter (15 upper or mid-ureteral, 3 lower ureteral) (stone size 0.4-1 (0.8) cm). All procedures were performed under general anesthesia or sedation via ketamin or fentanyl. Maximal 2500 shocks and a mean of 16.5 kV energy with a PCK lithotripter (Istanbul, Turkey) were used in each session. Stones smaller than <4 mm were accepted as a clinical in-significant residual fragments (CIRF&#8217;s). We carried out plain abdominal film of kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB) on 1st day, and excretory urography on 1st month after the procedure. Results: While the complete stone-free rate for kidney stones was 71.9%, CIRFs were observed in 12 RUU (11.2%). Clinically significant residual stones were observed in 10 RUU (9.4%) and remaining 8 (7.4%) RUU were unsuccessful. While 13 RUU (72.2%) with ureteral stones have been stone free, 5 (27.8%) were unsuccessful. Conclusion: As a minimally invasive method, ESWL was found to be safe and effective in the treatment of childhood urinary stone disease

Özet

Çalışmada 121 çocuk hastada böbrek ve üreter taşlarında beden dışı şok dalga ile taş kırma (ESWL) uygulamalarımıza ait sonuçlarımızın değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Son dört yıl içerisinde kliniğimize ortalama yaşı 7.9 (1-14) yıl olan 39’u kız, 82’si erkek toplam 121 hastadaki (125 renoüreteral hasta, RÜH) böbrek ya da üreter taşlarına ESWL uygulandı. 107 RÜH’de taşlar kaliks (n=75) veya böbrek pelvisi (n=32) (ortalama taş boyutu 2.2 cm), 18 RÜH’de üreter (15 üst ve orta üreter, 3 alt üreter) yerleşiminde idi (ortalama taş boyutu 0.8 cm). Uygulamaların tümü genel anestezi altında ya da fentanil/ ketamin ile sedasyon yapılarak en çok 2500 şok, ortalama 16.5 kV gücünde PCK (İstanbul, Türkiye) cihazı ile yapıldı. Hastalara ESWL sonrası 1. günde direkt üriner sistem grafisi, 1. ayda da intravenöz piyelografi ile kontrol uygulandı. <0.4 cm taşlar klinik olarak önemsiz artık taş (KÖAT) olarak kabul edildi. Böbrek taşlarında; 77 (%71.9) RÜH taştan yoksun, 12 (%11.3) RÜH’de KÖAT kalacak şekilde taştan yoksun hale gelirken 10 (%9.4) RÜH’de klinik olarak önemli artık saptanmış, 8 (%7.4) hastada ise mevcut taşlarda hiç kırılma olmamıştır. Üreter taşlarında ise, 13 RÜH’de (%72.2) taştan yoksun hale gelirken, 5 RÜH’de (%27.8) başarısız sonuç alındı. ESWL, çocukluk çağı üriner sistem taşlarında tatmin edici başarı oranları ile güvenle kullanılabilecek minimal invaziv bir tedavi yöntemidir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTURHAN, S., SEÇKİNER, İ., ERBAĞCI, A., YAĞCI, F., SOLAKHAN, M., SARICA, K. (2006). ESWL, in pediatric patients: Our experience in the renal and ureteral stones. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 524–528. https://ajindex.com/articles/328388

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Milinler DS, Murphy ME: Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 68: 241-248, 1993
  2. Raza A, Turna B, Smith G, Moussa S, Tolley D: Pediatric Urolithiasis, 15 years of local experience with minimally invasive endourological management of pediatric calculi. J Urol. 174: 982-985, 2005
  3. Newman DM, Coury T, Lingeman JE, Mertz JHO, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Knapp PM: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol. 136: 238-240, 1986
  4. Tan O, Karaoglan U, Sozen S, Bozkırlı I: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for treatment of ureteral calculi in pediatric patients. Pediatr Surg Int.19: 471-74,2003 5- Choong S, Whitfield H, Duffy P, Kellett M, Cuckow P, Van’t Hoff W, Corry D: The management of pediatric urolithiasis. BJU Int. 86: 857-860, 2000
  5. Logarakis NF, Jewett MAS, Luymes J, Honey RJD: Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol.163: 721-725, 2000
  6. Tan AHH, Al-Omar M, Densted JD, Razvi H: Ureteroscopy for pediatric urolithiasis: An evolving first-line therapy. Urology. 65: 153-156, 2005
  7. Al Busaidy SS, Prem AR, Medhat M, et al: Pediatric ureteric calculi efficacy of primary in situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. BJU Int. 82: 90-96, 1998
  8. Tan AH, Al-Omar M, Watterson JD, et al: Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis. J Endourol. 18: 527-530, 2004
  9. Minevich E, Rousseau MB, Wacksman J, Lewis A, Sheldon GA: Pediatric ureteroscopy technique and preliminary results. J Pediatr Surg. 32: 571, 1997
  10. Shroff S, Watson GM: Experience with ureteroscopy in children. Br J Urol. 75: 395, 1999
  11. Kroovand RL: Urinary calculi in childhood. In: O´Donnell B, Koff SA. Pediatric urology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 629-45, 1997
  12. Aksoy Y, Ozbey I, Atmaca AF, Polat O: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children experience using a mpl-9000 lithotriptor. World J Urol. 22: 115-119, 2004
  13. Hasanoglu E, Buyan N, Tumer L, Bozkırlı I, Demirel F, Karaoglan U: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. Acta Paediatr. 85: 377-379, 1996
  14. Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Sarılar O, Binbay M, Altunrende F, Ozkuvancı U: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract Stones in children a large scale retrospective analysis. J Urol. 170: 2405-2408, 2003
  15. Elsobky E, Sheir KZ, Madbouly K, Mokhtar AA: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: Experience using two second-generation lithotripters