Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2006 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Quality of life in benign prostatic hyperplasia

Selim prostat büyümesinde yaşam kalitesi

Pages
254–260
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, QoL in BPH was discussed including present data and future perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In view of the growing tremendous interest in quality of life (QoL) in almost every field of medicine, the scope of this review was to address the place of QoL in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in terms of selecting appropriate treatment policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Actually, the target of any proposed treatment for BPH is usually the symptoms of the patient.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, QoL in BPH was discussed including present data and future perspective.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cinsel fonksiyon bozukluğu · fizyolojik · Prostat hiperplazisi

Abstract

Introduction: In view of the growing tremendous interest in quality of life (QoL) in almost every field of medicine, the scope of this review was to address the place of QoL in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in terms of selecting appropriate treatment policy. Actually, the target of any proposed treatment for BPH is usually the symptoms of the patient. Therefore, it is more logical to know the status of QoL related to these symptoms for each particular patient in order to provide the most appropriate treatment. Since contemporary measures like symptom scores do not measure BPH specific QoL, they should not solely guide the physician in suggesting a treatment alternative for a BPH patient. In this review, QoL in BPH was discussed including present data and future perspective.

Özet

Son yıllarda yaşam kalitesinin (YK) her alanda giderek artan bir ilgi gördüğü dikkate alınarak bu derlemede YK'nin selim prostat büyümesindeki (BPH) özellikle tedaviyi yönlendirmedeki rolünün ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Aslında BPH hastalarında genellikle tedavide hedef hastanın semptomları olmaktadır. Dolayısıyla hastanın YK'nin bu semptomlardan ne kadar etkilendiğinin bilinmesi en uygun tedavi seçiminde esas olmalıdır. Mevcut uygulamaların özellikle semptom skorlarının YK'yi ölçmediği de bilindiğinden, sadece bunlara dayanarak bir tedavi önerilmemelidir. Bu derlemede mevcut bilgi birikimi ve gelecekteki perspektifi ile BPH'da YK irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MÜEZZİNOĞLU, T., ÇAM, K. (2006). Quality of life in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 254–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/328374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. World Health Organization: Measuring quality of life: The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). Geneva: WHO, 1993
  2. World Health Organization: The constitution of the WHO. WHO Chronicle 1: 29, 1947
  3. Meyhoff HH, Hald T, Nordling J, et al: A new patient weighted symptom score system (Dan PSS 1). Scand J Urol Nephrol, 27: 493-499, 1993
  4. Patrick DL and Deyo RA: Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care; 27: 217-232, 1989
  5. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ, 305: 160-164, 1992
  6. Hunt SM and McEwen J: The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illness, 2: 231-246, 1980
  7. Sells H, MacDonagh R: Investigation into partner morbidity of patients with BPE. Eur Urol, 33 (Sup 1): 108, 1998
  8. Doll HA, Black NA, Flood AB, McPherson K: Patients-percieved health status before and up to 12 months after transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br J Urol, 71: 297-305, 1993
  9. Doll HA, Black NA, Flood AB, McPherson K: Criterion validation of the Nottingham Health Profile: Patients views of surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy. Soc Sci Med, 37: 115-122, 1993
  10. Salinas-Sanchez AS, Hernandez-Millan I, LorenzoRomero JG, Segura-Martin M, Fernandez-Olano C, Virseda-Rodriguez JA: Quality of life of patients on the waiting list for benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Qual Life Res, 10: 543-553, 2001
  11. Trueman P, Hood SC, Nayak U, Mrazek MF: Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and self-reported diagnosed BPH and their quality of life in a community based survey of men in the UK. Br J Urol, 83: 410-415, 1999
  12. Akı FT, Aygün C, Bilir N, Erkan İ, Özen H: Prevalence of low urinary tract symptoms in a community-based survey of men in Turkey. Int J Urol, 10: 364-370, 2003
  13. Müezzinoğlu T, Lekili M, Gümüş B, Büyüksu C: Manisa İli Selçikli Köyü Erkeklerinde Alt Üriner Sistem Yakınma Prevalansı, Prostat Ağırlığı ve Artık İdrar ile Bağıntısı: Topluma Dayalı Çalışma -I-. Türk Üroloji Dergisi, 26: 332-338, 2000
  14. Barry MJ: Epidemiology and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am, 17: 495-508, 1990
  15. Hald T: Urodynamics in benign prostatic hyperplasia: A survey. Prostate, 2 (sup 1): 69, 1989
  16. Andersen JT: Benign prostatic hyperplasi