Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2008 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Current status of the laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of urinary calculi

Üriner sistem taş hastalığında laparoskopik cerrahinin son durumu

Pages
237–253
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Current status of the laparoscopic urinary stone surgery will be reviewed in the light of the literature and our experiences will be presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Currently, most of the urinary tract stones can successfully be treated with endourologic procedures, namely, shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When these modalities either failed or not indicated, a minimally invasive approach is needed as an alternative to open surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Current status of the laparoscopic urinary stone surgery will be reviewed in the light of the literature and our experiences will be presented.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ürolojik hastalıklar · Üriner taş · Laparoskopi

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, most of the urinary tract stones can successfully be treated with endourologic procedures, namely, shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. When these modalities either failed or not indicated, a minimally invasive approach is needed as an alternative to open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery achieved a great progression within the last two decades and it has been shown that almost all kind of open stone surgeries can be performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopy has definite advantages over open surgery and it should not solely be considered as a salvage procedure, but also a first choice in select cases in the treatment of urinary stone disease. Current status of the laparoscopic urinary stone surgery will be reviewed in the light of the literature and our experiences will be presented.

Özet

Günümüzde üriner sistem taşları çoğunlukla şok dalga tedavisi (ŞDT), üreteroskopi (ÜRS), fleksibl ÜRS, perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) gibi endoürolojik yöntemlerle başarıyla tedavi edilebilmektedir. Bu yöntemlerin uygun olmadığı veya başarısız olduğu durumlarda, açık cerrahiye alternatif minimal invazif yöntemlere gereksinim duyulmaktadır. Laparoskopik cerrahi son yirmi yıl içinde büyük bir ilerleme kaydetmiş olup açık cerrahiyle yapılan birçok taş ameliyatının laparoskopik olarak da gerçekleştirilebileceği gösterilmiştir. Açık cerrahiye göre üstünlükleri olan laparoskopi, üriner sistem taşlarında yalnızca diğer endoürolojik yöntemlerin başarısız olduğu durumlarda uygulanacak bir kurtarma cerrahisi olarak görülmemeli, seçilmiş hastalarda öncelikle düşünülecek en uygun tedavi yöntemi olabileceği de unutulmamalıdır. Bu derlemede, üriner sistem taşlarında laparoskopik cerrahinin son durumu yayınlar ışığında gözden geçirilecek ve kendi deneyimlerimiz sunulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAZIT, Y., ARIDOĞAN, İ. A., ABAT, D. (2008). Current status of the laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of urinary calculi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 237–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/328231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E: Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet, 2: 1265-1268, 1980
  2. Assimos DG, Boyce WH, Harrison LH, McCullough DL, Kroovand RL, Sweat KR: The role of open stone surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 142: 263-267, 1989
  3. Bichler KH, Lahme S, Strohmaier WL: Indications for open stone removal of urinary calculi. Urol Int, 59: 102- 108, 1997
  4. Henkel TO, Rassweiler J, Alken P: Ureteral laparosco- pic surgery. Ann Urol, 29: 61-72, 1995. (Abstract
  5. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al: Laparoscopic nephrecto- my: Initial case report. J Urol, 146: 278-82, 1991
  6. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol, 149: 103-5, 1993
  7. Rassweiler JJ, Henkel TO, Potempa DM, Coptcoat M, Alken P: The technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, adrenalectomy and nephroureterectomy. Eur Urol, 23: 425-30, 1993
  8. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC and Darshane AS: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol, 151: 927-929, 1994
  9. Jordan GH, McCammon KA, Robey EL: Laparosco- pic pyelolithotomy. Urology, 49: 131-134, 1997
  10. Gaur DD: Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol, 148: 1137-9, 1992
  11. Gaur DD: Retroperitoneal laparoscopy: some technical modifications. Br J Urol, 77: 304-6, 1996
  12. Hoenig DM, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Clayman RV: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a pelvic kidney: A case report and review of the literature. JSLS, 1: 163-5, 1997
  13. Valdivia-Uria JG, Abril Baquero G, Monzon Alebes- que F, Lopez Lopez JA, Lanchares Santamaria E: La- paroscopic management of complex lithiasis in horseshoe kidneys. Actas Urol Esp, 18 Suppl: 346-50, 1994. (Abst- ract
  14. Deger S, Tuellmann M, Schoenberger B, Winkelmann B, Peters R, Loening SA: Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 38: 263-5, 2004
  15. Van Cangh PJ, Abi Aad AS, Lorge F, Wese FX, Opso- mer R: Laparoscopic nephrolithotomy: the value of int- racorporeal sonography and color Doppler. Urology, 45: 516-9, 1995
  16. Ramakumar S, Lancini V, Chan DY, Parsons JK, Ka- voussi LR, Jarrett TW: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. J Urol, 167: 1378-80, 2002
  17. Challacombe B, Dasgupta P: Reconstruction of the lo- wer urinary tract by laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Current Opinion in Urology, 17: 390-395, 2007. 18