Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2011 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Our results of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in cases with primer and recurrent hipospadias

Primer ve nüks hipospadiyas olgularında tübülarize insize plak üretroplastisi sonuçlarımız

Pages
136–141
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: TIPU is an easy-to-apply technique with low complications rates, good functional and cosmetic outcomes in both primary and recurrent hypospadias cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the efficacy of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) technique on cases with primer and recurrent hypospadias.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Records of 141 (120 primary, 21 recurrent) hypospadias patients who underwent TIPU and completed 3rd month control were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: TIPU is an easy-to-apply technique with low complications rates, good functional and cosmetic outcomes in both primary and recurrent hypospadias cases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) technique on cases with primer and recurrent hypospadias. Materials and methods: Records of 141 (120 primary, 21 recurrent) hypospadias patients who underwent TIPU and completed 3rd month control were retrospectively reviewed. Urethral stent with percutaneous cystostomy and Foley catheter were used in 110 (72%) and 31 (22%) patients, respectively. Catheter or stent was removed on postoperative 7th day, and patients were asked for control visit on 2nd week and third month. The success rate of TIPU was assessed on primary and recurrent cases. Additionally, the effect of patient’s age, placement of urethral meatus, and type of urinary divertion on TIPU success were investigated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 8.4±4.6 years (range 2-25 years). Urethral fistula developed in 23 (19.2%) of 120 primary patients and 5 (23.8%) of 21 recurrent patients (p=0.623). There was no difference in term of mean age in patients with and without urethral fistula (9.2 years vs. 8.2 years, p=0.377). The placement of urethral meatus were coronal in 27 (19.1%), subcoronal in 101 (71.6%), and mid-penil in 13 patients (9.2%). There was no difference in terms of placement of urethral meatus and urethral fistula in primary and recurrent cases (p=0.147). There was no difference between urethral Foley catheter and urethral stent with percutaneous cystostomy usage in terms of urethral fistula development (20.9% vs. 16.1%, p=0.738). Conclusion: TIPU is an easy-to-apply technique with low complications rates, good functional and cosmetic outcomes in both primary and recurrent hypospadias cases.

Özet

Amaç: Primer ve nüks hipospadiyas olgularında tübülarize insize plak üretroplastisi (TIPU) tekniğinin etkinliğini karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve yöntem: TIPU yapılmış 120’si primer ve 21’i nüks olan 3. ay kontrolü yapılmış toplam 141 hastanın dosyaları geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Hastaların 110’unda (%72) üretral Foley kateter, 31’inde (%22) perkütan sistostomi ile birlikte üretral stent kullanıldı. Operasyon sonrasında kateter ya da stent 7. günde alındı ve hastalar 2. haftada ve 3. ayda kontrole çağrıldı. Primer ve nüks olgularda TIPU tekniğinin başarı oranı değerlendirildi. Ayrıca hasta yaşı, üretral meatusun yeri ve üriner diversiyon tipinin TIPU başarısı üzerine etkileri incelendi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 8.4±4.6 (dağılım 2-25) idi. Yüzyirmi primer hastanın 23’ünde (%19.2) ve 21 nüks hastanın 5’inde (%23.8) üretral fistül gelişti (p=0.623). Üretral fistül gelişen ve gelişmeyen hastalarda yaş açısından fark yoktu (9.2 ve 8.2, p=0.377). Üretral meatusun yeri 27 hastada (%19.1) koronal, 101 hastada (%71.6) subkoronal ve 13 hastada (%9.2) orta penil yerleşimli idi. Primer ve nüks olgularda üretral meatusun yerleşim yeri ile üretral fistül gelişimi açısından fark saptanmadı (p=0.147). Üretral Foley kateter ve perkütan sistostomi ile birlikte üretral stent kullanımı arasında üretral fistül gelişimi açısından fark saptanmadı (%20.9 ve %16.1, p=0.738). Sonuç: TIPU, hem primer hem de nüks hipospadiyas olgularında iyi fonksiyonel ve kozmetik sonuçları olan düşük komplikasyon oranlarına sahip kolay uygulanabilir bir tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAN, A., ASLAN, Y., TUNCEL, A., YILDIZ, M., BALCI, M., BİLGİN, Ö. (2011). Our results of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in cases with primer and recurrent hipospadias. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 136–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/328133

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Retik AB, Alan JG. Hypospadias. In: Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan D, Wein A, editors. Campbell’s Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2002. p. 2284-333
  2. Remzi D, Çakmak F, Erol D. İlkokul çağındaki erkek çocuklarında dış genital organ anomalileri ve gelişim bozuklukları insidansı. Hacettepe Tıp Cerrahi Bülteni 1980;13:269-73
  3. Altunoluk B, Bakan V, Özer A, Malkoç Ö, Gül AB, Efe E, et al. The prevalence of external genital organ anomalies among the male students attending primary schools in Kahramanmaras. [Article in Turkish] Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2010;36:87-90
  4. Snodgrass W. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994;151:464-5
  5. Baskin LS, Colborn T, Himes K. Hypospadiyas and endocrine disruption: is there a connection? Environ Health Perspect 2001;109:1175-83
  6. Baskin LS. Hypospadiyas and urethral development. J Urol 2000;163:951-6
  7. Holmes NM, Miller WL, Baskin LS. Lack of defects in androgen production in children with hypospadiyas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2811-6
  8. Silver R, Russell D. 5alpha-Reductase type 2 mutations are present in some boys with isolated hypospadias. J Urol 1999;162:1142-5
  9. Riccabona M, Oswald J, Koen M, Beckers G, Schrey A, Lusuadi L. Comprehensive analysis of six years experience in tubularised incised plate urethroplasty and its extended application in primary and secondary hypospadias repair. Eur Urol 2003;44:714-9
  10. Duckett JW. MAGPI (Meatoplasty and Glanuloplasty): a procedure for subcoronal hypospadiyas. Urol Clin North Am 1981;8:513-9
  11. Zaontz MR. The GAP (glans approximation procedure) for glanular/coronal hypospadiyas. J Urol 1989;141:359-61
  12. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:463-72
  13. Elder JS, Duckett JW, Snyder HM. Onlay island flap in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias without chordee. J Urol 1987;138:376-9
  14. Baskin LS, Erol A, Li YW, Cunha GR. Anatomical studies of hypospadiyas. J Urol 1998;160:1108-15
  15. Steckler RE, Zaontz MR. Stent-free Thiersch-Duplay hypospadiyas repair with the Snodgrass modification. J Urol 1997;158:1178-80
  16. Snodgrass WT, Lorenzo A. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadiyas. BJU Int 2002;89:90-3
  17. Ayyıldız A, Nuhoğlu B, Karagüzel E, Germiyanoğlu C. Which diversion affects success in the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty? [Article in Turkish] Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2006;32:106-9
  18. Yang SS, Chen SC, Hsieh CH