Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2010 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Our preliminary results

Laparoskopik donör nefrektomi: Erken dönem sonuçlarımız

Pages
61–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is effective and safe with graft survival results comparable to open approach in addition to well known advantages such as decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and recovery period, and better esthetic appearence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To present preliminary results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The results of 18 transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy performed between March 2008 and April 2009 in our clinic were presented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is effective and safe with graft survival results comparable to open approach in addition to well known advantages such as decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and recovery period, and better esthetic appearence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To present preliminary results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Materials and methods: The results of 18 transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy performed between March 2008 and April 2009 in our clinic were presented. Nephrectomy side was right in one patient and left in the rest. Results: Nine patients were male and 9 were female, and the mean age was of 56 (range 42-73) years. All of the cases were succesfully completed laparoscopically. Mean operation time was 155±37 (range 90-240) min and mean follow-up period was 6.3 (range 1-12) months. Mean warm ischemia period was 175±57 (range 90-320) sec. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.8±0.7 (range 2-4) days. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occured. Two transplantation patients were reoperated because of ureteral complications. Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is effective and safe with graft survival results comparable to open approach in addition to well known advantages such as decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and recovery period, and better esthetic appearence.

Özet

Amaç: Laparoskopik donör nefrektomi ile elde edilen erken dönem sonuçların sunulması. Gereç ve yöntem: Kliniğimizde Mart 2008-Nisan 2009 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilen 18 transperitoneal laparoskopik donör nefrektomi sonuçları bildirilmektedir. Vakaların birine sağ diğerlerine sol nefrektomi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Hastaların 9’u kadın, 9’u erkek ve yaş ortalaması 56 yıl (dağılım 42-73) idi. Tüm olgular laparoskopik olarak başarıyla sonuçlandırılmıştır. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 155±37 (dağılım 90-240) dk ve takip süresi 6.3 (dağılım 1-12 ay) aydır. Ortalama sıcak iskemi süresi 175±57 (dağılım 90-320) sn’dir. Ortalama postoperatif yatış süresi 2.8±0.7 (dağılım 2-4) gündür. İntraoperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyon gelişmemiştir. İki transplantasyon hastası üreter komplikasyonları nedeniyle tekrar opere edilmiştir. Sonuç: Laparoskopik donör nefrektomi ameliyat sonrası ağrı, daha kısa hastanede yatış süresi ve iyileşme süresi ve daha iyi estetik sonuçlar gibi bilinen avantajları yanında, greft sağkalımında da açık cerrahi ile karşılaştırılabilir sonuçları olan etkin ve güvenli bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVAŞÇAOĞLU, İ., DOĞAN, H. S., GÜRSOY, E., KORDAN, Y., VURUŞKAN, H., OKTAY, B. (2010). Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Our preliminary results. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 61–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/328130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Barry JM, Conlin M, Golconda M, Norman D. Strategies to increase living donor kidney transplants. Urology 2005;66(5 Suppl):43-6
  2. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety KS, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1370-1
  3. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995;60:1047-9
  4. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2090-3
  5. Gürkan A, Kaçar S, Karaca C, Varılsüha C, Karaoğlan M, Doğan SM. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Turk J Surg 2001;17:351-6
  6. Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2003;90:1323-32
  7. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1494-9
  8. El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA. Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2004;171:40-3
  9. Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 2001;166:1270-4
  10. Ng CS, Abreu SC, Abou El-Fettouh HI, Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Goldfarb DA, et al. Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 2004;63:857-61
  11. Kaçar S, Gürkan A, Karaca C, Varılsüha C, Tilif S. Laparoskopik donör nefrektomi. Sözlü bildiri. Türkiye Organ Nakli Kuruluşları Koordinasyon Derneği 6. Kongresi. Erzurum, 15-18 Ekim 2008. Sözlü bildiri no.S2
  12. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, Bellman GC, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology 2002;60;415-9
  13. Simforoosh N, Bassiri A, Ziaee SA, Tabibi A, Salim NS, Pourrezagholi F, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: the first randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 2003;35:2553-4
  14. Ratner LE, Hiller J, Sroka M, Weber R, Sikorsky I, Montgomery RA, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc 1997;29:3402-3
  15. Türk IA, Değer S, Davis JW, Giesing M, Fabrizio MD, Schönberger B, et al. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique with preservation of vascular length. J Urol 2002;167:630-3