Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2012 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Okul öncesi çocuklarda perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimlerimiz

Our experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in preschool children

Pages
143–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Earlier recognition of complications and institution of necessary interventions on time require close collaboration with the anesthesia team.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Our aim is to present our experiences with PNL performed on a group of preschool-age children in our clinics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: A total of 23 renal units of 23 patients (10 male, and 13 female patients) with a mean age of 4.3 months (22-72 months) underwent PNL.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Earlier recognition of complications and institution of necessary interventions on time require close collaboration with the anesthesia team.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Our aim is to present our experiences with PNL performed on a group of preschool-age children in our clinics. Materials and methods: A total of 23 renal units of 23 patients (10 male, and 13 female patients) with a mean age of 4.3 months (22-72 months) underwent PNL. In 11 patients, the stones were in the right kidneys, and in 12 patients, the stones were in the left kidneys. The stones were localized in the renal pelves (n=10), lower (n=8), middle (n=5), upper pole (n=5) calices or proximal ureters (n=1). In addition, concomitant stones in the distal segment of the ipsilateral (n=2 patients) and contralateral (n=1) ureter were present. In all renal units, following the mechanical dilatation of the nephrostomy access tract, a 17-Fr nephroscope was inserted to perform PNL. Results: The mean stone surface area was 212 mm2 (110-720 mm2). Average durations of anesthesia, PNL were 77 minutes (45-155 min), and 56 minutes (19-135 min), respectively. Average fluoroscopic manipulation time was 3.4 minutes (2-8 min). To facilitate access, prior mechanical dilatation was performed. Three patients with concomitant ureteral stones underwent ureteroscopy with a 4-Fr semi-rigid ureteroscope, followed by PNL. At the end of postoperative 1 month period, 17 (74%) patients achieved a completely stone-free state, while 5 (21%) cases were fully stone-free after postoperative shock wave lithotripsy. Major bleeding was encountered in one patient after intrarenal introduction of the nephroscope closer to the stone. In 2 patients, blood replacement was also required during the early postoperative period. Average hospitalization time was 1.9 days (1-7 days). Conclusion: Although some major and minor complications were observed, PNL should be the first alternative in the management of renal stones in preschool children. Earlier recognition of complications and institution of necessary interventions on time require close collaboration with the anesthesia team.

Özet

Amaç: Amacımız, kliniğimizde son 2 yılda okul öncesi yaş grubunda yapılan PNL deneyimlerimizi sunmaktır. Gereç ve yöntem: Yaş ortalaması 4.3 yıl (22 ay-72 ay) olan 10’u erkek, 13’ü kız olmak üzere 23 hastada 23 renal üniteye PNL ameliyatı yapıldı. Taşlar 11 hastada sağ, 12 hastada sol taraf yerleşimiydi. Taşların 10’u pelvis renalis, 9’u alt pol, 5’i orta pol, 5’i üst pol ve 1’i proksimal üreter yerleşimliydi. İki hastada eş zamanlı aynı taraf alt üreterde, 1 hastada karşı taraf alt üreterde taş vardı. Böbreğe giriş sağlamak için tüm hastalarda mekanik dilatasyon yapıldı. PNL işlemi için 17 F nefroskop kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama taş boyutu 212 mm2 (110-720 mm2) idi. Ortalama anestezi süresi 77 dk (45-155 dk) ve ortalama PNL ameliyatı süresi 56 dk (19-135 dk) idi. Ortalama skopi kullanma süresi 3.4 dk (2-8 dk) idi. Akses için mekanik dilatasyon yapıldı. Eş zamanlı üreter taşı olan 3 hastaya 4.f semirijit üreteroskop ile üreteroskopi yapılıp PNL’ye geçildi. Postoperatif 1. günde 17 hastada tam taşsızlık (%73.9) sağlandı. Beş hastada (21.7) PNL sonrası rezidüel taş saptandı. Bunlara SWL uygulandı. 1 hastada (%4.3) böbreğe girişi takiben taşa ulaşır ulaşmaz major kanama oldu. 2 hastada postoperatif dönemde kan replasmanına gerek duyuldu. Ortalama hastanede yatış süresi 2.9 gün (1-7 gün) idi. Sonuç: Bazı majör ve minör komplikasyonlara açık olmasına rağmen; okul öncesi çocuklarda böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde PNL ilk seçenek olmalıdır. Komplikasyonların erkenden fark edilmesi ve gerekli müdahalenin zamanında yapılması için anastezi ekibiyle vaka boyunca koordineli çalışılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANCAKTUTAR, A. A., SÖYLEMEZ, H., PENBEGÜL, N., ATAR, M., BOZKURT, Y., HATİPOĞLU, N. K., KILIÇ, F. (2012). Okul öncesi çocuklarda perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimlerimiz. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 143–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/328063

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Tellaloğlu S, Ander H. Stones in children. Turk J Pediatr 1984;26:51-60
  2. Akinci M, Esen T, Tellaloğlu S. Urinary stone disease in Turkey: an updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 1991;20:200-3
  3. Ali Ünsal. Çocuklarda böbrek taşı tedavisinde perkütan nefrolitotomi. Endoüroloji Bülteni 2008;4:1-6 4. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-9
  4. Woodside JR, Stevens GF, Stark GL, Borden TA, Ball WS. Percutaneous stone removal in children. J Urol 1985;134:1166-7
  5. Smaldone MC, Corcoran AT, Docimo SG, Ost MC. Endourological management of pediatric stone disease: present status. J Urol 2009;181:17-28
  6. Dogan HS, Tekgul S. Management of pediatric stone disease. Curr Urol Rep 2007;8:163-73 8. Ozturk A, Guven S, Kilinc M, Topbaş E, Piskin M, Arslan M. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it safe and effective in preschool children? J Endourol 2010;24:1935-9
  7. Unsal A, Resorlu B, Kara C, Bozkurt OF, Ozyuvali E. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants, preschool age, and older children with different sizes of instruments. Urology 2010;76:247-52
  8. Guven S, Istanbulluoglu O, Ozturk A, Ozturk B, Piskin M, Cicek T, at al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is highly efficient and safe in infants and children under 3 years of age. Urol Int 2010;85:455-60
  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13
  10. Oner A, Demircin G, Ipekçioğlu H, Bülbül M, Ecin N. Etiological and clinical patterns of urlithiasis in Turkish children. Eur Urol 1997;31:453-8
  11. Sahin A, Tekgül S, Erdem E, Ekici S, Hasçiçek M, Kendi S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older children. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:1336-8
  12. Zeren S, Satar N, Bayazit Y, Bayazit AK, Payasli K, Ozkeçeli R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Endourol 2002;16:75-8
  13. Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain Z, Hashmi A, Hussain M, Zafar MN, et al. Management of pediatric urolithiasis in Pakistan: experience with 1,440 children. J Urol 2003;169:634-7
  14. Mahmud M, Zaidi Z. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children before school age: experience of a Pakistani centre. BJU Int 2004;94:1352-4
  15. Farhat WA, Kropp BP. Surgical treatment of pediatric urinary stones. AUA Update Series 2007;26:3
  16. Wu HY, Docimo SG. Surgical management o