Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2012 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Akut renal kolik tedavisinde diklofenak sodyum, metilprednizolon ve alfa blokör tedavilerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of diclofenac sodium, prednisolone and an alpha blocker for the treatment of renal colic

Pages
23–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important aspects to consider in regard to a treatment modality include diminishing pain, dissolving blockage, a preservation of renal function and minimizing the side effects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we compare the efficacy of diclofenac sodium, methylprednisolone and alpha-blockers for the treatment of renal colic treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: A total of 30 patients between the ages of 18-70 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important aspects to consider in regard to a treatment modality include diminishing pain, dissolving blockage, a preservation of renal function and minimizing the side effects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we compare the efficacy of diclofenac sodium, methylprednisolone and alpha-blockers for the treatment of renal colic treatment. Material and methods: A total of 30 patients between the ages of 18-70 were included in this study. Patients were referred to the Meram Medical Faculty Urology Department or Department of Emergency Medicine at Selcuk University between October 2008 and January 2009. This prospective study was approved by the Selcuk University Meram Medical Faculty Ethics Committee. Patients were randomly divided into 3 cohorts of 10 patients each. The first group consisted of patients receiving diclofenac sodium and an alpha blocker, the second group of patients received diclofenac sodium and prednisolone, and the third group of patients received diclofenac sodium alone. Each patient was diagnosed and evaluated by the same clinician. Evaluation was based on the Numerical Classification Score (NCS) and the Renal Colic Symptom Score (RCSS). Pain intensity was evaluated prior to medication administration and 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 hours thereafter. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test. P- value of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results : Symptoms immediatiely prior to medication administration and after 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 hours are evaluated. There are no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). In group 1, stone expulsion occured in 4 patients (40%), a finding that is statistically significant (p=0.01). No adverse events occurred in any group during this study. Conclusion: Comparison of the therapeutic response among the 3 groups revealed no statistically significant difference. The most important aspects to consider in regard to a treatment modality include diminishing pain, dissolving blockage, a preservation of renal function and minimizing the side effects.

Özet

Amaç: Renal kolik tedavisinde diklofenak sodyum, metilprednizolon ve alfa blokör tedavilerinin karşılaştırılmasını sunuyoruz. Gereç ve yöntem: Ekim 2008-Ocak 2009 tarihleri arasında kliniğimize başvuran ve renal kolik tanısı alan 30 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar başvuru sırasına göre; diklofenak sodyum ve alfa blokör verilen 10 hasta, diklofenak sodyum ve prednizolon verilen 10 hasta ve sadece diklofenak sodyum verilen 10 hasta olmak üzere üç gruba ayrıldı. Tüm hastaların tedavi etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi aynı klinisyen tarafından Sayısal Derecelendirme Skoru (SDS) ve Renal Kolik Semptom Skoru (RKSS) ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Tek başına diklofenak sodyum alan grupta ve diklofenak sodyum ile prednizolon alan grupta tedavi sırasında taş düşüren hasta olmazken, diklofenak sodyum ve alfa blokör tedavisi alan grupta 4 hasta (%40) taş düşürdü. Taş düşürme yönünden diğer gruplar ile kıyaslandığında diklofenak sodyum ve alfa blokör kullanan grup istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p=0.01). Her üç grupta da 5. 10. 15. 20 ve 30. saatte SDS’de ayrıca maximum ve minumum RKSS’de istatistiksel olarak fark tespit edilmedi (p<0.05). Sonuç: Renal kolik tedavisi sırasında ağrı kontrolü için farklı tedavi ajanları kullanılabilir. Alfa blokör kullanımı taş düşürme açısından pozitif bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜMER, A., KAYNAR, M., TOPBAŞ, E., HASSAN, M. A., GÜRBÜZ, R. (2012). Akut renal kolik tedavisinde diklofenak sodyum, metilprednizolon ve alfa blokör tedavilerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 23–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/328055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Müslümanoğ lu AY, Tepeler A. Renal kolik tanı ve tedavisi. Marmara Medical Journal 2008
  2. Shokeir AA. Renal colic: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. European Urology 2001
  3. [CrossRef] 3.Anderson KR, Smith RC. CT for evaluation of flank pain. J Endourol 2001
  4. [CrossRef] 4.Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 2007
  5. [CrossRef] 5.Brown J. Diagnostic and treatment patterns for renal colic in US emergency departments. Int Urol Nephrol 2006
  6. [CrossRef] 6.Thakore S, McGuan EA, Morrison W. Emergency ambulance dispatch: is there a case for triage? J R Soc Med 2002
  7. [CrossRef] 7.Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Usefulness of history-taking, physical examination and diagnostic scoring in acute renal colic. Eur Urol 1998
  8. [CrossRef] 8.Mutgi A, Williams JW, Nettleman M. Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med 1991
  9. [CrossRef] 9.Altay B, Horasanlı K, Kendirci M, Tanrıverdi O, Boylu U, Miroğlu C. Renal kolik tedavisinde piroksikam hızlı çözünen dilaltı tablet formunun, intramuskuler piroksikam ile çift kör, randomize, plasebo kontrollü karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Urology 2003
  10. Miralles R, Cami J, Gutierrez J, Torne J, Garces JM, Badenas JM. Diclofenac versus dipyrone in acute renal colic: A doule-blind controlled trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1987
  11. [CrossRef] 11.Al-Waili NS. Intramusculer tenoxicam to treat acute renal colic. Br J Urol 1996
  12. [CrossRef] 12.Perlmutter A, Miller L, Trimble LA, Marion DN, Vaughan ED Jr, Felsen D. Toradol, a NSAID used for renal colic, decreases renal perfusion and ureteral pressure in a canine model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Urol 1993
  13. Labrecque M, Dostaler LP, Rousselle R, Nguyen T, Poirier S. Efficacy of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in the treatment of acute renal colic. A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 1994
  14. [CrossRef] 14.Lipkin M, Shah O. The use of alpha-blockers for the treatment of nephrolithiasis. Rev Urol 2006
  15. Nuss GR, Rackley JD, Assimos DG. Adjunctive therapy to promote stone passage. Rev Urol 2005
  16. Porpiglia F, Vaccino D, Billia M, Renard J, Cracco C, Ghignone G, at el. Corticosteroids and tamsulosin in the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal üreter stones: single drug or association? Eur Uro