Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2013 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

Prostat ağırlığının robot yardımlı radikal prostatektomi sonuçları üzerine etkisi

The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Pages
209–213
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the impact on oncological outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The effect of prostate volume on the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: A total of 180 patients who underwent RARP and had at least a 1-year follow-up were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the impact on oncological outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The effect of prostate volume on the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was evaluated. Material and methods: A total of 180 patients who underwent RARP and had at least a 1-year follow-up were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on prostate weight (Group 1: <45 g, Group 2: 45-75 g, Group 3: >76 g). Erectile function and continence were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperative. The International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) score and daily pad usage were evaluated as indicators of erectile function and continence, respectively. The measurement of two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values over 0.2 ng/mL was considered biochemical disease recurrence. Results: Patients with larger prostates were older and had a longer operative time and higher PSA level compared with patients with smaller prostates (p<0.05). The positive surgical margin rate was higher in patients with smaller prostates (p=0.06). However, patients with a prostate weight <45 g had higher IIEF scores at 3 and 6 months. The IIEF scores were similar at the end of the 1-year follow-up period. Pad usage and time to continence were higher in patients with larger prostates (p>0.05). Conclusion: Although prostate weight affected the surgical outcomes of RARP, the functional and oncological outcomes were similar among all patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the impact on oncological outcomes.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada prostat hacminin robot yardımlı radikal prostatektomide (RYRP) cerrahi, fonksiyonel ve onkolojik sonuçlara etkisini araştırdık. Gereç ve yöntemler: 2008-2011 yılları arasında RYRP uygulanan ve en az 1 yıllık takibi bulunan 180 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar prostat spesimen hacimlerine göre 3 gruba ayrıldı. Birinci grup ( 76 g) 39 hasta yer aldı. Hastaların erektil fonksiyonları ve kontinans durumları 3. 6. 9. ve 12. ayda değerlendirildi. Erektil fonksiyon değerlendirmesinde Uluslararası Erektil İşlev İndeksi (IIEF) skoru kullanıldı. Hastaların kontinans değerlendirmesinde ise günlük ped kul- lanım sayısı not edildi. Hiç ped kullanmayan veya güvenlik pedi kullanan hastalar kontinan olarak kabul edildi. Biyokimyasal nüks nadir Prostat Spesifik Antijen (PSA) değerinden sonra ardışık iki PSA değerinin 0,2 ng/mL üzerinde tespit edilmesi olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Büyük prostatı olan olguların yaşları, operasyon süreleri, PSA düzeyleri küçük prostatı olan hastalara göre yüksek izlendi (p 0,05). Sonuç: Prostat büyüklüğü, RYRP yapılan hastaların cerrahi sonuçlarını etkilese de birinci yıl fonksiyonel ve onkolojik sonuçlarına etkisi olmamıştır. Onkolojik etkinin belirlenebilmesi için daha uzun dönem takip gereklidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYLU, U., TURAN, T., BAŞATAÇ, C., ÖNOL, F. F., GÜMÜŞ, E. (2013). Prostat ağırlığının robot yardımlı radikal prostatektomi sonuçları üzerine etkisi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 209–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/328013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Boylu U, Başataç C, Turgay T, Önol FF, Gümüş E. Robot yardımlı radikal prostatektomi: Cerrahi, onkolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2012
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carrol PR, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prosta- tectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Labanaris AP, Zugor V, Witt JH. Robot-assisted radical prosta- tectomy in patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≥100 grams versus ≤50 grams: surgical, oncologic and short-term functional outcomes. Urol Int 2013
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Hong MK, Yao HH, Rzetelski-West K, Namdarian B, Pedersen J, Peters JS, et al. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts. BJU Int 2012
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volu- me on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Singh A, Fagin R, Shah G, Shekarriz B. Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Boczko J, Erturk E, Golijanin D, Madeb R, Patel H, Joseph JV. Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Min SH, Park YH, Lee SB, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH. Impact of prostate size on pathologic outcomes and prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol 2012
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Chang CM, Moon D, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Marchetti PE, Shikanov S, Razmaria AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2011
  12. [CrossRef] 12.Gershman B, Dahl DM, Olumi AF, Young RH, Scott McDougal W, Wu CL. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading. Urol Oncol 2011 Dec 27. [Epub ahead of print]. 13.Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, et al. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 20