Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2014 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4

Atnalı böbrekte laparoskopik piyelolitotomi

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a horseshoe kidney

Pages
240–244
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We assume that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective approach for renal pelvic stone in case of horseshoe kidney.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The horseshoe kidney is the most frequent renal anomaly, with a prevalence of 0.25% and a male to female ratio of 2:1.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article we aimed to report a 50-year-old man who had left kidney stones accompanied with a horseshoe kidney.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We assume that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective approach for renal pelvic stone in case of horseshoe kidney.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The horseshoe kidney is the most frequent renal anomaly, with a prevalence of 0.25% and a male to female ratio of 2:1. In this article we aimed to report a 50-year-old man who had left kidney stones accompanied with a horseshoe kidney. In this case percutaneous nephrolithotomy was deemed to be a risky procedure due to malrotation of the pelviocalyceal system and possible interposition of bowel loops between kidney and the abdominal wall. Therefore, we preferred laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. At the end of the procedure, the patient was stone-free. We observed no complication. The patient was discharged after 72 hours. We assume that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective approach for renal pelvic stone in case of horseshoe kidney.

Özet

Atnalı böbrek %0,25 prevalans ile böbreğin en sık görülen anomalisidir ve erkek kadın oranı 2:1’dir. Bu yazıda, sol böbrek taşları ile birlikte atnalı böbreği olan 50 yaşında erkek hastayı sunmayı amaçladık. Bu olguda, pelvikalisyel sistemin malrotasyonu ve barsakların karın duvarı ile böbrek arasında girme ihtimalinden dolayı perkütan nefrolitotomi operasyonunun yüksek riskli olduğuna karar verildi. Bu yüzden laparoskopik piyelolitotomi operasyonunu tercih ettik. Vaka sonunda hastada taşsızlık sağlandı.Komplikasyon gözlenmedi. Hasta postoperatif 72. saatte taburcu edildi. Atnalı böbrek ve renal pelvis taşı olan olgularda laparoskopik pyelolitotomi güvenli ve etkili bir cerrahi yaklaşımdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖlÇÜCÜOĞLU, E., ÇAMTOSUN, A., BİÇER, S., BAYRAKTAR, A. M. (2014). Atnalı böbrekte laparoskopik piyelolitotomi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4, 240–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/327998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Salas M, Gelet A, Martin X, Sanseverino R, Viguier JL, Dubernard JM. Horseshoe kidney: the impact of percutaneous surgery. Eur Urol 1992;21:134-7
  2. Jones DJ, Wickham JE, Kellett MJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1991;145:481-3
  3. Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, Denstedt JD, Watterson JD, Beiko DT, et al. Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 2003;170:48-51. [CrossRef] 4. Pitts WR Jr, Muecke EC. Horseshoe kidneys: a 40-year experience. J Urol 1975;113:743-6
  4. Bilen CY, Şahin A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys. Turkish Journal of Urology 2006;32:495-9
  5. Lampel A, Hohenfeller M, Schultz-Lampel D, Lazica M, Bohnen K, Thürof JW. Urolithiasis in horseshoe kidneys: Therapeutic management. Urology 1996;47:182-6. [CrossRef] 7. Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, et al. Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: Single-center experience and review of literature. J Endourol 2005;19:353-8. [CrossRef] 8. Tunc L, Tokgoz H, Tan MO, Kupeli B, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I. Stones in anomalous kidneys: results of treatment by shock wave lithotripsy in 150 patients. Int J Urol 2004;11:831-6. [CrossRef] 9. Sheir KZ, Madbouly K, Elsobky E, Abdelkhalek M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys: 11-year experience with two second-generation lithotripters. Urology 2003;62:10-5. [CrossRef] 10. Theiss M, Wirth MP, Frohmuller HG. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with renal malformations. Br J Urol 1993;72:534-8. [CrossRef] 11. Esuvaranathan K, Tan EC, Tung KH, Foo KT. Stones in horseshoe kidneys: Results of treatment by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourology. J Urol 1991;146:1213-5
  6. Maheshwari PN, Bhandarkar DS, Shah RS, Andankar MG, Saple AL. Laparoscopy-assisted transperitoneal percutaneous nephrolit- hotomy for recurrent calculus in isthmic calix of horseshoe kidney. J Endourol 2004;18:858-61. [CrossRef] 13. Mosavi-Bahar SH, Amirzarger MA, Rahnavardi M, Moghaddam SM, Babbolhavaeji H, Amirhasani S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with kidney malformation. J Endourol 2007;21:520-4. [CrossRef] 14. Gupta NP, Mishra S, Seth A, Anand A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in abnormal kidneys: single center experience. Urology 2009;73:710-4. [CrossRef] 15. Rodrigues Netto N Jr, Lemos GC, Fiuza JL. Colon perforation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 1988;32:223-4. [CrossRef] 16. Goswami