Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2014 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4

Double J üreteral stentin nadir bir komplikasyonu: Soliter böbrekte renal parankimal perforasyon

An unusual complication of a double-J ureteral stent: Renal parenchymal perforation in a solitary kidney

Pages
245–247
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This complication of ureteral stents is rarely observed and is life-threatening.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Double-J ureteral stenting is commonly used in urological practice and has various complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report a patient with a renal parenchymal perforation and perirenal hematoma due to a double-J ureteral stent in a solitary kidney.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This complication of ureteral stents is rarely observed and is life-threatening.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Double-J ureteral stenting is commonly used in urological practice and has various complications. We report a patient with a renal parenchymal perforation and perirenal hematoma due to a double-J ureteral stent in a solitary kidney. This complication of ureteral stents is rarely observed and is life-threatening.

Özet

Üreteral double j stent uygulaması ürolojide çeşitli komplikasyonlarla yaygın şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada soliter böbrekte double j stentine bağlı böbrek perforasyonu ve perirenal hematom gelişen bir vaka sunulmuştur. Bu komplikasyon üreteral stentlerin nadir görülen ve hayatı tehdit eden bir komplikas - yonudur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLALAN, U., AKAND, M., HASIRCI, E., KOŞAN, T. M. (2014). Double J üreteral stentin nadir bir komplikasyonu: Soliter böbrekte renal parankimal perforasyon. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4, 245–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/327973

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C, de Sio M, Autorino R, D’Armiento M. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 2002;69:136-40. [CrossRef] 2. Dundar M, Calıskan T, Kocak I. Unexpected complication: renal parenchymal perforation with double-j ureteral stent. Urol Res 2008;36:279-81. [CrossRef] 3. Nomikos MS, Chousianitis Z, Georgiou C, Georgellis C, Rikas P, Anagnostou T. Renal parenchyma perforation and hematoma formation following double-j stent insertion in a solitary functioning kidner: an unusual complication. Case Rep Urol 2012;2012:301275. 4. Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, de la Rosette J, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: A systematic review. J Urol 2008;179:424-30. [CrossRef] 5. Borboroglu PG, Amling CL, Schenkman NS, Monga M, Ward JF, Piper NY, et al. Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a multi-intitutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications. J Urol 2001;166:1651-7. [CrossRef] 6. Damiano R, Autorino R, Esposito C, Cantiello F, Sacco R, de Sio M, et al. Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open. Eur Urol 2004;46:381-7. [CrossRef] 7. Srivastava A, Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Mandhani A. Routine stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi is unnecessary: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 2003;17:871-4. [CrossRef] 8. Knudsen BE, Beiko DT, Denstedt JD. Stenting after ureteroscopy: pros and cons. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:173-80. [CrossRef] 9. Kidd RV, Confer DJ, Baskin AM. Ureteral and renal vein perforation with placement into the renal vein as a complication of the pigtail ureteral stent. J Urol 1980;124:424-6. 10. Chitale SV, Ho ET. Haemoperitoneum secondary to ureteric stenting. Int Urol Nephrol 2002;34:197-8. [CrossRef] 11. Gelder MS, Alvarez RD, Partridge EE. Ureteroarterial fistulae in exenteration patients with indewelling ureteral stents. Gynecol Oncol 1993;50:365-70. [CrossRef]