Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2011 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Definitif tedavi alan prostat kanserli hastalarda biyokimyasal nüksün tanı ve tedavisi

Diagnosis and management of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer who received definitive treatment

Pages
295–302
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the morbidity rates were very high in early RP series, contemporary salvage RP series have more acceptable morbidity rates and improvements in local and distant cancer control.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After deÀnitive treatment, recurrence is seen in some patients, as manifested by a rise in prostate-speciÀc antigen (PSA) before clinical progression.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The BCR threshold ranges between 0.2 and 0.6 ng/ mL.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the morbidity rates were very high in early RP series, contemporary salvage RP series have more acceptable morbidity rates and improvements in local and distant cancer control.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After deÀnitive treatment, recurrence is seen in some patients, as manifested by a rise in prostate-speciÀc antigen (PSA) before clinical progression. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) may herald a life-threatening situ- ation or be an insigniÀcant Ànding. The deÀnition of BCR depends on the treatment. There is no standard- zed deÀ nition of BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP). The BCR threshold ranges between 0.2 and 0.6 ng/ mL. According to the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) criteria, BCR after radiotherapy (RT) is 3 consecutives rise or, according to the 2005 consensus panel, 2 or 3 ng/mL ises above the nadir PSA. The clinical course of BCR can be very variable. In some cases, rapid progres- ion and metastasis can develop, whereas in others clinical progression may not occur. An increased risk of clinical progression in patients with BCR is correlated with time to BCR, prostatectomy Gleason score, and PSA doubling time (PSA-DT). An important parameter in determining the treatment option in patients with BCR is systemic or localized BCR. Local recurrence can be detected with a physical examination, imaging echniques, PSA kinetics, and clinicopathological Àndings. When a tumor is detected with current imaging echniques and biopsy, it may be too late to begin deÀnitive treatment. In patients with BCR after RP, the reatment options are RT and hormone therapy. The BCR-free survival with RT is better when applied at a low PSA threshold. The other important parameters affecting BCR-free survival are the RT dose, total Gleason score, surgical margins, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and PSA-DT before RT. Treatment options for patients with BCR after RT are RP, brachytherapy, and cryotherapy. Although the morbidity rates were very high in early RP series, contemporary salvage RP series have more acceptable morbidity rates and improvements in local and distant cancer control.

Özet

After deÀnitive treatment, recurrence is seen in some patients, as manifested by a rise in prostate-speciÀc antigen (PSA) before clinical progression. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) may herald a life-threatening situ- ation or be an insigniÀcant Ànding. The deÀnition of BCR depends on the treatment. There is no standard- ized deÀ nition of BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP). The BCR threshold ranges between 0.2 and 0.6 ng/ mL. According to the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) criteria, BCR after radiotherapy (RT) is 3 consecutives rise or, according to the 2005 consensus panel, 2 or 3 ng/mL rises above the nadir PSA. The clinical course of BCR can be very variable. In some cases, rapid progres- sion and metastasis can develop, whereas in others clinical progression may not occur. An increased risk of clinical progression in patients with BCR is correlated with time to BCR, prostatectomy Gleason score, and PSA doubling time (PSA-DT). An important parameter in determining the treatment option in patients with BCR is systemic or localized BCR. Local recurrence can be detected with a physical examination, imaging techniques, PSA kinetics, and clinicopathological Àndings. When a tumor is detected with current imaging techniques and biopsy, it may be too late to begin deÀnitive treatment. In patients with BCR after RP, the treatment options are RT and hormone therapy. The BCR-free survival with RT is better when applied at a low PSA threshold. The other important parameters affecting BCR-free survival are the RT dose, total Gleason score, surgical margins, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and PSA-DT before RT. Treatment options for patients with BCR after RT are RP, brachytherapy, and cryotherapy. Although the morbidity rates were very high in early RP series, contemporary salvage RP series have more acceptable morbidity rates and improvements in local and distant cancer control.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYDAN, H., BAYKAL, K. (2011). Definitif tedavi alan prostat kanserli hastalarda biyokimyasal nüksün tanı ve tedavisi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 295–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/327970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106-30.
  2. Etzioni R, Tsodikov A, Mariotto A, Szabo A, Falcon S, Wegelin J, et al. Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:175-81.
  3. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 2005;16:481-8.
  4. Oesterling JE, Chan DW, Epstein JI, Kimball AW Jr, Bruzek DJ, Rock RC, et al. Prostate specific antigen in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of localized prostatic cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1988;139:766-72.
  5. Partin AW, Oesterling JE. The clinical usefulness of prostate specific antigen: update 1994. J Urol 1994;152:1358-68.
  6. Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2003;169:517-23. Moul JW. Prostate specific antigen only progression of prostate cancer. J Urol 2000;163:1632-42.
  7. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999;281:1591-7.
  8. Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1499-507.
  9. Amling CL, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML, Slezak JM, Zincke H. Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: what is the most appropriate cutpoint? J Urol 2001;165:1146-51.
  10. Scher HI, Eisenberger M, D’Amico AV, Halabi S, Small EJ, Morris M, et al. Eligibility and reporting guidelines for clinical trials for patients in the state of a rising prostate-specific antigen: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:537-56.
  11. Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D’Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 2007;177:540-5.
  12. Fijuth J, Chauvet B, Vincent P, Félix-Faure C, Reboul F. Serum prostate-specific antigen in monitoring the response of carcinoma of the prostate to radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 1992;23:236-40.