Journals / Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Effects of Standard and Diabetesspecific Dietary Products on Tight Blood Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients

Kritik Hastalarda Standart ve Diyabete Özgü Beslenme Ürünlerinin, Sıkı Kan Şekeri Kontrolü Üzerine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
139–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It was concluded that diabetes-specific enteral formula did not contribute significantly to tight blood glucose control in non-diabetic critical patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Nutritional support is a part of intensive care unit therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The daily caloric requirements for patients who tolerated enteral product intake were calculated as 25 kcal x body weight.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It was concluded that diabetes-specific enteral formula did not contribute significantly to tight blood glucose control in non-diabetic critical patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Nutritional support is a part of intensive care unit therapy. In our study, we investigated the effects of diabetes-specific enteral formula and standard enteral formula on tight blood glucose control and insulin requirement in hyperglycemic intensive care unit patients. Materials and Methods: The study was planned as a prospective, randomized, crossover comparative study. The daily caloric requirements for patients who tolerated enteral product intake were calculated as 25 kcal x body weight. Calorie requirements were divided into 21 hours and hourly calorie needs and nutrient volume were calculated. Eighty patients were divided into two groups. First group received ISOSOURCE® Standard and second group received Novasource® Diabetes in the first 24 hours. In the second 24 hours, group 1 received Novasource® Diabetes, while Group 2 received Isosource® Standard. An intravenous insulin infusion was given to maintain the blood glucose level at 80-150 mg/dL. Blood glucose level was measured every 4 hours by taking arterial blood gas. Maximum, minimum, mean and median blood glucose levels, total insulin, mean insulin levels and the number of insulin dose changes were recorded. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between two groups in terms of maximum, minimum and mean blood glucose levels. When compared, median blood glucose levels were numerically significant, but were not statistically significant in both groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that diabetes-specific enteral formula did not contribute significantly to tight blood glucose control in non-diabetic critical patients.

Özet

Amaç: Beslenme desteği, yoğun bakım tedavisinin bir parçasıdır. Çalışmamızda hiperglisemik kritik yoğun bakım hastalarında diyabete özgü enteral ürün ile standart enteral ürünün sıkı kan şekeri kontrolü ve insülin ihtiyacı üzerine etkilerini araştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma prospektif, randomize, “cross over” karşılaştırmalı çalışma olarak planlandı. Enteral ürün alımını tolere eden hastalarda günlük alması gereken kalori gereksinimleri 25 kcal x vücut ağırlığı olarak hesaplandı. Kalori gereksinimleri 21 saate bölünerek saatlik kalori ihtiyaçları ve beslenme ürünü volümü hesaplandı. Seksen hasta 2 gruba ayrılarak 1. gruba ilk 24 saatte ISOSOURCE® Standart, 2. gruba ise Novasource® Diabet verildi. İkinci 24 saatte 1. gruba Novasource® Diabet, 2. gruba ise ISOSOURCE® Standart verildi. Kan şekeri düzeyini 80-150 mg/ dL düzeyinde tutacak şekilde intravenöz yoldan insülin infüzyonu verildi. Dört saatte bir kan şekeri düzeyi arter kan gazı alınarak ölçüldü. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda en yüksek, en düşük, ortalama ve medyan kan glukoz değerleri ile toplam insülin, ortalama insülin düzeyleri ve insülin doz değişiklik sayısı kaydedildi. En yüksek, en düşük ve ortalama kan glukoz değerleri açısından her iki ürün arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Her iki grupta medyan kan glukoz düzeyleri karşılaştırıldığında sayısal olarak anlamlı görülse de istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı. Sonuç: Diyabetik olmayan kritik hastalarda diyabete özgü ürünün sıkı kan şekeri kontrolünde çok büyük bir katkısı olmadığı sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILASLAN, D., ÜRKMEZ, S., DİKMEN, Y., DEMİRKIRAN, O., UTKU, T. (2020). Comparison of the Effects of Standard and Diabetesspecific Dietary Products on Tight Blood Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 139–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/327692

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Moral AR, Demirağ K. Yoğun bakımda beslenme. In: Tüzüner F, editör. Anestezi yoğun bakım ağrı. 1. Baskı. Ankara: MN Medikal & Nobel; 2010. s. 1487-95.
  2. Mesejo A, Acosta JA, Ortega C, Vila J, Fernandez M, Ferreres J et al. Comparison of a high- protein disease- spesific enteral formula with a high- protein enteral formula in hyperglycemic critically ill patients. Clinical Nutrition 2003;22:295-305.
  3. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:135967. McMahon MM, Miles JM. Glycemic control and nutrition in the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 2006;9:120-3.
  4. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, Meersseman W, Wouters PJ, Milants I et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;354:449-61. VISEP: Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, Meier-Hellmann A, Ragaller M, Weiler N et al. German Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet): Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:125-39.
  5. Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S, Me´lot C, Annane D, Groeneveld J et al. A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: The Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:173848. NICE-SUGAR: Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V ve ark. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1346-9.
  6. Joseph B, Genaw J, Carlin A, Jordan J, Talley J, Rubinfeld I. Perioperative tight glycemic control: The challenge of bariatric surgery patients and the fear of hypoglycemic events. The Permanente Journal Spring 2007;11:2. Patel GW, Roderman N, Lee KA, Charles MM, Nguyen D, Beougher P, et al. Sliding scale versus tight glycemic control in the noncritically ill at a community hospital. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:1774-80.
  7. Peters A, Davidson M, Isaac RM. Lack of glucose elevation after simulated tube feeding with a low-carbohydrate, high-fat enteral formula in patients with type I diabetes. Am J Med 1989;87:178-82.
  8. Grahm TW, Zadrozny DB, Harrington T. The benefits of early jejunal hyperalimentation in the head-injured patient. Neurosurgery 1989;25:729-35.
  9. Elia N, Ceriello A, Laube H, Sinclair AJ, Engfer M, Stratton RJ. Enteral nutritional support and use of diabetes-spesific formulas for patients with diabetes: a systematic r