Journals / TYB Akademi Dil Edebiyat ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 27

A Brief Look At the Reasons of British Existence in Jerusalem from Religion to Ideology

Kudüs’te İngiliz Varlığının Dinden İdeolojiye Değişen Gerekçelerine Özet Bir Bakış

Pages
169–191
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This alliance transformed into the Anglo-Jewish conflict after the First Great War when Britain founded the British Mandatory in Palestine and disregarded the famous Balfour Declaration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Great Britain’s official presence in Jerusalem starts with the foundation of the British Consulate in 1838 and ends with its withdrawal in 1847 following Jewish terrorism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Consulate in Jerusalem was established to resist the Russian influence in the area that had increased after the Unkiar Skelessi Treaty and was a potential threat to the routes to India.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This alliance transformed into the Anglo-Jewish conflict after the First Great War when Britain founded the British Mandatory in Palestine and disregarded the famous Balfour Declaration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Great Britain’s official presence in Jerusalem starts with the foundation of the British Consulate in 1838 and ends with its withdrawal in 1847 following Jewish terrorism. During this period, the value system behind the policy followed by Great Britain towards Jerusalem and its surrounding was notably variable due to international as well as internal political developments. The Consulate in Jerusalem was established to resist the Russian influence in the area that had increased after the Unkiar Skelessi Treaty and was a potential threat to the routes to India. This paper concludes that British policy makers instrumentalized various religious and ideological values to influence political decision makers and the public into supporting the varying policies intended to advance their colonial purposes- mainly protecting the routes to India. To this end, they presented the British public and the Evangelist Church with the concept of a necessary Jewish restoration; in other words, converting the Jews into Protestants. This was followed by an introduction of the British ideal of Jewish Return to Palestine to British Jews and later to the Zionists. This Ideal later evolved into the Jewish return to the Holy Land when the Evangelist Church failed with their Jewish restoration, thereby making way for the Anglo-Jewish alliance. The main international reason behind this alliance was the emergence of Germany as a rival to Great Britain in the Near East. This alliance transformed into the Anglo-Jewish conflict after the First Great War when Britain founded the British Mandatory in Palestine and disregarded the famous Balfour Declaration.

Özet

Büyük Britanya’nın Kudüs’teki resmi varlığı 1838’de burada bir İngiliz Konsolosluğu’nun ihdası ile başlar ve 1947’de Yahudi terörizmi sebebiyle son bulur. Kudüs’te İngiliz Konsolosluğu, Hünkâr İskelesi Antlaşmasından sonra artan ve Hindistan yolunu tehdit edebilecek Rusya tehdidine karşı ihdas olunmuştur. Bu dönemde Britanya’nın Kudüs ve çevresine yönelik siyasetinin arkasındaki değerler sisteminin, uluslararası gelişmeler kadar iç siyasi gelişmelerin tesiriyle de dalgalandığına şahit olunur. Bu makalede; değişen politikalarında karar alıcıları etkilemek ve kamuoyunun desteğini almak için İngiliz siyaset yapıcıların gerçek amaçlarının Hindistan yolunu korumak gibi kolonyal hedefler olduğu, bunun için de dini ve ideolojik değerleri araçsallaştırdıkları anlaşılmıştır. Bu amaçla İngiliz kamuoyuna ve Evangelist Kiliseye sunulan gerekçe, Yahudilerin Protestanlığa ihtidasını temsil eden Yahudi Restorasyonu; daha sonra Siyonistlere sunulan gerekçe ise Yahudilerin Kutsal topraklara avdeti hakkındaki İngiliz ideali olmuştur. Evangelist Kilisenin Yahudi restorasyonu konusundaki başarısızlığı; İngilizlerin tamamen, İngiliz-Yahudi ittifakını mümkün ve gerekli kılan Yahudilerin Kutsal topraklara dönmesi hedefine yönelmesine sebep olmuştur. İngiliz-Yahudi ittifakının arkasındaki uluslararası gelişme ise Almanya’nın Yakın Doğu’da İngiltere’ye karşı bir rakip olarak ortaya çıkmasıdır. Birinci Büyük Savaştan sonra İngiltere’nin Filistin’de Manda İdaresi kurması ve meşhur Balfour Deklarasyonu’nu bir tarafa bırakması, söz konusu ittifakın İngiliz-Yahudi çatışmasına dönmesiyle neticelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDAKUL, N. Ö. (2019). A Brief Look At the Reasons of British Existence in Jerusalem from Religion to Ideology. TYB Akademi Dil Edebiyat ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 27, 169–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/327252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. N. Groves, Journal of a Residence in Bagdad, London, MDCCCXXXII, 1832, s. 22-23
  2. A.L. Tibawi, British Interests in Palestine, 1800-1901: A Study of Religious and Educational Enterprise Oxford University Press, London, 1961, s.221 Abigail Green, The British Empire and the Jews: An Emprerialism of Human Rights?, Oxford University Press.
  3. The Past and Present Society, No: 199 (May, 2008) s. 175-205
  4. Albert Montefiore Hyamson, British Projects for the Restoration of the Jews (1875-1954), Petty &Sons, Leeds, 1917
  5. Alexander McCaul, The Jarusalem Bishopric, Hatchard&Son, Picadilly London, MDCCCXLV (1845), s.4-9 Alexander Schölch, “Britain in Palestine, 1838-1882: The Roots of the Balfour Policy”, Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 22 No. 1, Autumn, 1992; (s. 39-56) s.40 Walker, The Future of Palestine: As a Problem of International Policy, and in Connection with the Requirements of Christianity and the Expectation of the Jews, 1881, London, s. 4 Barbara J. Smith, The Roots of Separatism in Palestine- British Economic Policy 1920–29
  6. Syracuse University Press, New York, 1993. s.177 Benjamin Disraeli, The New Crusade, Henry Colburn, Publisher, London, 1847 Bernard Lewis, Te Sha-ping of the Modern Middle East, Oxford University Press, 1994, s. 14-15, 32, Bernard Lewis, The Shaping of the Modern Middle East, Oxford University Press, 1994, s.32 Bernard Regan, The Implementation of Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palastine(1917-1936),
  7. Doktora Tezi, University of Surrey, 2016, s. 2 Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist,Wordsworth Classics, Hertfordshire, 1992
  8. Charles Dickens, Our Mutual Friend, Wordsworth Classics, Hertfordshire, 1997
  9. David Cesarani, Major Farran’s Hat, Murder, Scandal and Britain’s War Against Jewish Terrorism (1945-1948)
  10. William Heinemann, London, 2000.
  11. Edward Ingram, British Persian Connection, 1798-1828,
  12. Prelude to the Great Game in Asia, Clarendon Press, London, 1992, s. 316-317 Francis Evans Bailey, “The Economics of Foreign Policy, 1825-1850”,
  13. The Journal of Modern History, Vol.12, No. 4 (Dec., 1940), s. 452–453.
  14. G. R. Berridge, British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to Present Day, University of Leicester, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, Boston, 2009, s. 4 Hayrettin Pınar, “Mehmet Ali Paşa İsyanı ve Metternich’in Osmanlı Siyaseti”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 11, 2011, s.158-1
  15. Hillel Cohen, Army of Shadows: Palestinian Collaboration with Zionism, 1917–1948,
  16. University of California Press, London, 2008, s. 16 http://www.hurriyetdaily