Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Distribution of Hoof Lesions and Hoof Health Strategies on a Robotic Milking Farm

Pages
29–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, to prevent management malfunctions causing metabolic problems, stress and traumas in animal, the use of senseless technology should be avoided in order to ensure sustainable hoof health on robotic milking farms

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkey, the use of robotic milking technology is still very new.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The scientific data showing the effects on animal health are important as well as the studies related to the economic performance of milking robots.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, to prevent management malfunctions causing metabolic problems, stress and traumas in animal, the use of senseless technology should be avoided in order to ensure sustainable hoof health on robotic milking farms
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In Turkey, the use of robotic milking technology is still very new. The scientific data showing the effects on animal health are important as well as the studies related to the economic performance of milking robots. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hoof diseases encountered on dairy cattle farms working with robotic milking system and to determine the causes and to provide the necessary precautions to prevent and control hoof health problems. In the study, 93 Holstein dairy cattle aged between 35-54 months were evaluated in a dairy farm with two robotic milking system (system capacity of 120 cows/day). The locomotion scores were recorded and the cows’ feet were examined in hoof trimming chute and claws of all cows were trimmed according to biomechanical characteristics of foot. The treatment method was determined according to the condition of the lesion in cases of hoof disease and the results of recovery were followed. In the herd, cases of claw deformation (6.4%; n=6), sole ulcer (4.3%; n=4), white line disease (3.2%; n=3), digital dermatitis (8.6%; n=8), heel lesion (6.4%; n=6), foot rot (1.0%; n=1), limax (2.1%; n=2), hoof crack (2.1%; n=2) and coroner inflammation (1.0%; n=1) were recorded. Evaluated etiologically, it has been found that mistakes in the application of bath solutions used in the single footbath at the exit of the robotic milking unit in the formation of infectious foot diseases, feeding mistakes made without regard to cow traffic in the case of non infectious foot diseases and exposure of the foot to traumas due to not paying attention to comfort in the feeding areas are effective. As a result, to prevent management malfunctions causing metabolic problems, stress and traumas in animal, the use of senseless technology should be avoided in order to ensure sustainable hoof health on robotic milking farms

🔖

Cite This Article

AYALP, G. Ç., İLHAN, G., ORMAN, A. (2018). Distribution of Hoof Lesions and Hoof Health Strategies on a Robotic Milking Farm. Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 29–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/326268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alıç D, Yener SM. Süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde robotlu sağım sistemi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(4): 369-380, 2006. Anonymus. http://www.delaval.co.uk/-/Product-Information1/Milking/Products/Stallwork/VMS-station/DeLaval_voluntary_milking_system_VMS/?sp=585 (Erişim: 27.08.2017)
  2. Armstrong DV, Daugherty LS. Milking robots in large dairy farms. Comput Electron Agric Computers, 17: 123– 128, 1997. Atasoy N. Erzurum yöresinde süt sığırlarında görülen ayak hastalıklarının insidansı ve bunların sağaltımı. Van Vet J, 14(1): 1-5, 2003.
  3. Bijl R, Kooistra SR, Hogeveen H. The profitability of automatic milking on Dutch dairy farms. J Dairy Sci, 90(1): 239-248, 2007. Cook NB. A Review of the design and management of footbaths for dairy cattle. Vet Clin Food Anim, 33:195– 225, 2017.
  4. Çeçen G, Görgül OS. Bursa yöresindeki bir işletmede, sağmal süt sığırı sürüsünde karşılaşılan topallıkların değerlendirilmesi. Vet Cerrahi Derg, 13(1): 5-10, 2007. Çeçen G. Olgu açıklamalı sığır ayak hastalıkları atlası ilaveli sığırlarda topallık ve ayak hastalıkları, ISBN:978- 605-66841-0-4,
  5. Stüdyo Star Ajans Ltd. Şti., Bursa. 2016. de Koning K, Rodenburg J. Automatic milking: state of the srt in Europe and North America. In: Automatic Milking—A Better Understanding (Eds: A Meijering, H Hogeveen, CJAM de Koning), Wageningen Academic Publishers,
  6. Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 27-37, 2004. de Koning K, Slaghuis B, van der Vorst Y. Milk quality on farm with an automatic milking system. In: Automatic Milking—A Better Understanding (Eds: A Meijering, H Hogeveen, CJAM de Koning), Wageningen Academic Publishers,
  7. Wageningen, Netherlands, pp.311-320, 2004.
  8. Engel PD, Hyde J. A real options analysis of automatic milking systems. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32(2): 282-294, 2003.
  9. Garcia E, Klaas I, Amigo JM, Bro R, Enevoldsen C. Lameness detection challenges in automated milking systems addressed with partial least squares discriminant analysis. J Dairy Sci, 97: 7476–7486, 2014.
  10. Gitau T, McDermontt JJ, Mbiuki SM. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for lameness in dairy cattle in small-scala farms in Kikuyu division, Kenya. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 28(2): 101-115, 1996. Graves RE. A primer on robotic milking systems. Agricultural and Biological Engineering Fact Sheet, 1st edition, p 105, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. www.abe.psu.edu, 2002. Greenoug PR. Bovine Laminitis and Lameness. A HandsOn Approach, Saunders & Els