Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Determination Biochemical Differences and Rapid Identification of Yersinia ruckeri and Lactococcus garvieae Isolated from Aquaculture

Pages
37–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The comprehensive biochemical differences of Y. ruckeri and L. garvieae were shown in the present study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aquaculture has growing much more than 100% at the last decade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, we aimed in this study, determination of biochemical differences and identify two bacteria in a short time by using rapid test kits. 30 isolates of each Y. ruckeri and L. garvieae that are represent different regions of Turkey were used and biochemical characteristics were determined by conventional microbiologic test and API RAPID test kits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The comprehensive biochemical differences of Y. ruckeri and L. garvieae were shown in the present study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aquaculture has growing much more than 100% at the last decade. Rainbow trout is the most economically important fish among the aquatic species. Bacterial agent, especially, Yersinia ruckeri and Lactococcus garvieae have limited freshwater fish production all over the world. There are many reports about identification of bacterial pathogens in aquaculture but most of them should not supported with detailed biochemical features. Therefore, we aimed in this study, determination of biochemical differences and identify two bacteria in a short time by using rapid test kits. 30 isolates of each Y. ruckeri and L. garvieae that are represent different regions of Turkey were used and biochemical characteristics were determined by conventional microbiologic test and API RAPID test kits. Y. ruckeri is the more heterogenetic biochemical structure comparing to L. garvieae. All isolates were successfully identified within 5-7 hours with rapid test kits while there are some differences between each other. The comprehensive biochemical differences of Y. ruckeri and L. garvieae were shown in the present study.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, M. F., SATICIOĞLU, İ. B., ALTUN, S. (2018). Determination Biochemical Differences and Rapid Identification of Yersinia ruckeri and Lactococcus garvieae Isolated from Aquaculture. Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 37–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/326260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abril M, Campo M, Önenç A, Sanudo C, Alberti P, Negueruela A. Beef colour evolution as a function of ultimate pH. Meat Sci, 58: 69-78, 2001.
  2. Ahn DU, Olson D, Jo C, Chen X, Wu C, Lee J. Effect of muscle type, packaging, and irradiation on lipid oxidation, volatile production, and color in raw pork patties. Meat Sci, 49: 27-39, 1998.
  3. Alcalde MJ, Negueruela AI. The influence of final conditions on meat colour in light lamb carcasses. Meat Sci, 57: 117-123, 2001.
  4. Allais S, Journaux L, Leveziel H, Payet-Duprat N, Raynaud P, Hocquette JF, Lepetit J, Rousset S, Denoyelle C, Bernard-Capel C, Renand, G. Effects of polymorphisms in the calpastatin and mu-calpain genes on meat tenderness in 3 French beef breeds. J Anim Sci, 89: 1-11, 2011.
  5. Anar Ş, Et ve Et Ürünleri Teknolojisi, 2. Baskı,
  6. Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa-Türkiye. 2012.
  7. Ardicli S, Samli H, Dincel D, Soyudal B, Balci F. Individual and combined effects of CAPN1, CAST, LEP and GHR gene polymorphisms on carcass characteristics and meat quality in Holstein bulls. Arch Anim Breed, 60: 303-313, 2017.
  8. Arslan A, Et muayenesi ve et ürünleri teknolojisi, 2. Baskı,
  9. Medipres, Malatya-Türkiye. 2002.
  10. Bagnato P, Barone V, Giacomello E, Rossi D, Sorrentino V. Binding of an ankyrin-1 isoform to obscurin suggests a molecular link between the sarcoplasmic reticulum and myofibrils in striated muscles. J Cell Biol, 160: 245-253, 2003.
  11. Barendse W, Harrison BE, Hawken RJ, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM, Thomas MB, Bunch RJ. Epistasis between calpain 1 and its inhibitor calpastatin within breeds of cattle. Genetics, 176: 2601-2610, 2007.
  12. Bhuiyan M, Kim N, Cho Y, Yoon D, Kim KS, Jeon J, Lee J. Identification of SNPs in MYOD gene family and their associations with carcass traits in cattle. Livest Sci, 126: 292-297, 2009.
  13. Borges BO, Curi RA, Baldi F, Feitosa FLB, Andrade WBF, Albuquerque LG, Oliveira HN, Chardulo LAL. Polymorphisms in candidate genes and their association with carcass traits and meat quality in Nellore cattle. Pesq Agropec Bras, 49: 364-371, 2014.
  14. Buchanan FC, Fitzsimmons CJ, Van Kessel AG, Thue TD, Winkelman-Sim DC, Schmutz SM. Association of a missense mutation in the bovine leptin gene with carcass fat content and leptin mRNA levels. Genet Selec Evol, 34: 105- 116, 2002.
  15. Burrow H, Moore S, Johnston D, Barendse W, Bindon B. Quantitative and molecular genetic influences on properties of beef: a review. Animal Prod Sci, 41: 893-919, 2001.
  16. Byun S, Zhou H, Forrest R, Frampton C, Hickford J. Association of the ovine calpastatin ge