SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of surgical approaches to bezoar-induced acute mechanical intestinal obstruction

Bezoarların neden olduğu akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyona cerrahi yaklaşımların karşılaştırılması

Mehmet Abdussamet BOZKURT
Ali KOCABAŞ
Osman KÖNEŞ
Kaplan Baha TEMİZGÖNÜL
Halil ALIŞ
Pages
143–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Despite a variety of surgical, pharmacological, and endoscopic treatment modalities have been defined for intestinal bezoars, the standard model of treatment is still controversial.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the patients who were operated on for acute mechanical intestinal obstruction secondary to intestinal bezoars.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients who were operated on due to intestinal bezoars, were investigated according to their age, gender, preoperative diagnosis, type of operation, operation time and postoperative complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Despite a variety of surgical, pharmacological, and endoscopic treatment modalities have been defined for intestinal bezoars, the standard model of treatment is still controversial.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the patients who were operated on for acute mechanical intestinal obstruction secondary to intestinal bezoars. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients who were operated on due to intestinal bezoars, were investigated according to their age, gender, preoperative diagnosis, type of operation, operation time and postoperative complications. Results: Ten of the 18 patients underwent segmental resection of the small intestine, while bezoar extraction and enterotomy was performed in eight patients. No difference was detected among investigated parameters between the two groups. Conclusion: Despite a variety of surgical, pharmacological, and endoscopic treatment modalities have been defined for intestinal bezoars, the standard model of treatment is still controversial.

Özet

Amaç: Akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyon nedeniyle ameliyat edilen intestinal bezoarlı hastalar incelendi. Gereç ve Yöntem: İntestinal bezoar saptanan 18 hasta yaş, cinsiyet, preoperatif tanı, yapılan ameliyat, ameliyat süresi ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar yönünden incelendi. Bulgular: Ameliyat edilen 18 hastadan 10'una segmenter ince barsak rezeksiyonu, 8'ine enterotomi ve bezoar ekstraksiyonu yapıldı. Gruplar arasında incelenen parametreler açısından fark saptanmadı. Sonuç: İntestinal bezoarlarda cerrahi, farmakolojik ve endoskopik olarak çeşitli tedavi yöntemleri tanımlansa da standart tedavi yöntemi halen tartışmalıdır. Başa Dön Özet Giriş Materyal ve Metod Bulgular Tartışma Kaynaklar

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, M. A., KOCABAŞ, A., KÖNEŞ, O., TEMİZGÖNÜL, K. B., ALIŞ, H. (2012). Comparison of surgical approaches to bezoar-induced acute mechanical intestinal obstruction. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 143–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/325784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ganpathi IS, Cheah WK. Laparoscopic-assisted management of small bowel Obstruction Due to Phytobezoar. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005; 15: 30-32. doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000148461.39275.13 2) Lo CY, Lau PW. Small bowel phytobezoars: an uncommon cause of small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 1994; 64: 187-189. doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02175.x 3) Yau K, Siu W, Law B, et al. Laparoscopic approach compared conventional open approach for benzoar induced small bowel obstruction. Arch Surg 2005; l40: 972-975. 4) Hayanga AJ, Bass-Wilkins K, Bulkley GB. Current management of small-bowel obstruction. Adv Surg 2005; 39: 1-33. doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2005.05.001 5) Schoeffl V, Varatorn R, Blinnikov O, et al. Intestinal obstruction due to phytobezoars of banana seeds: A case report. Asian J Surg 2004; 27: 348-351. doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60067-1 6) Pfau P, Ginsberg G. Foreign bodies and bezoars. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH, editors, eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2002; 395-397. 7) Hayes PG, Rotstein OD. Gastrointestinal phytobezoars: presentation and management. Can J Surg 1986; 29: 419-20. 8) Escamilla C, Robles-Campos R, Parrilla-Paricio P, et al. Intestinal obstruction and bezoars. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179: 285-288. 9) Dirican A, Unal B, Tatli F, et al. Surgical treatment of phytobezoars causes acute small intestinal obstruction. Bratisl Lek Listy 2009; 110: 158-61. 10) Liou CH, Yu CY, Lin CC, et al. CT diagnosis of small bowel obstruction due to phytobezoar. J Formos Med Assoc 2003; 102: 620-624. 11) Rippolés T, García-Aguayo J, Martínez MJ, et al. Gastrointestinal bezoars: sonographic and CT characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 65-69. 12) Blam ME, Lichtenstein GR. A new endoscopic technique for the removal of gastric phytobezoars. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 404-408. doi.org/10.1067/mge.2000.108407 13) Lange V. Gastric phytobezoar: an endoscopic technique for removal. Endoscopy 1986; 18: 195-196. doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1018371 14) Chae HS, Kim SS, Han SW, et al. Endoscopic removal of a phytobezoar obstructing the distal small bowel. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 264-266. doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.116326 15) Krausz MM, Moriel EZ, Ayalon A, et al. Surgical aspects of gastrointestinal persimmon phytobezoar treatment. Am J Surg 1986; 152: 526-30. doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(86)90221-7 16) de Menezes Ettinger JE, Silva Reis JM, de Souza EL, et