Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: A 5-year experience in a training and research hospital

Akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyon: Bir eğitim ve araştırma hastanesi'nin 5 yıllık deneyiminin sonuçları

Pages
10–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Documented parameters were demographic data, etiological factors, the overall accuracy of the imaging study in patients who had computerized tomography scan, performance of diagnostic and/or therapeutic colonoscopy, the type of treatment, and total length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The outcomes of the patients who have been managed with the diagnosis of acute mechanical bowel obstruction were reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Medical recordings of the patients who have been managed for acute mechanical bowel obstruction between January 2005 and January 2010 were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Documented parameters were demographic data, etiological factors, the overall accuracy of the imaging study in patients who had computerized tomography scan, performance of diagnostic and/or therapeutic colonoscopy, the type of treatment, and total length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality rates.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The outcomes of the patients who have been managed with the diagnosis of acute mechanical bowel obstruction were reviewed. Patients and Methods: Medical recordings of the patients who have been managed for acute mechanical bowel obstruction between January 2005 and January 2010 were reviewed. Documented parameters were demographic data, etiological factors, the overall accuracy of the imaging study in patients who had computerized tomography scan, performance of diagnostic and/or therapeutic colonoscopy, the type of treatment, and total length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality rates. Results: Medical data revealed a total of 400 patients that fit the criteria. The mean age was 55.4 years, and 71% of patients were male. The most common etiological factor was peritoneal adhesions. The accuracy of computerized tomography was found to be 96.2%. Forty five patients had emergency colonoscopy, and 16 of these patients had therapeutic colonoscopy. The rate of morbidity and mortality was 24% and 12.5%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in patients who had conservative treatment and surgical treatment was 1.82 and 6.50 days, respectively. Conclusion: The cornerstone of management in patients with acute mechanical bowel obstruction seems to be composed of clinical evaluation and computerized tomography scan. Identification of the patients with acute mechanical bowel obstruction who need emergency surgery is of paramount importance, because of significant increase in both morbidity and mortality rates associated with delayed treatment. Of note, it should be kept in mind that emergency colonoscopy may serve as not only a diagnostic, but also a therapeutic tool in selected patients.

Özet

Amaç: Akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyon tanısı ile takip ve tedavisi yapılan hastaların sonuçlarını sunmayı amaçladık. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2005 ve Ocak 2010 tarihleri arasında akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyon tanısı ile izlem ve tedavisi yapılan hastaların ileriye dönük olarak kaydedilen tıbbi verileri içinden demografik bilgileri, etyolojik faktörleri, bilgisayarlı tomografi çekilen hastalarda tanıda doğruluk oranı, kolonoskopi yapılan hastalarda tanıda doğruluk ve tedavi edicilik oranı, yapılan tedavi, hastanedeki toplam yatış süresi, morbidite ve mortalite oranları gözden geçirildi. Bulgular: Akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyon tanılı toplam 400 hastanın verileri incelendi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 55.4 ve %71'i erkek idi. En sık etiyolojik faktörün peritoneal yapışıklıklar olduğu saptandı. Bilgisayarlı tomografinin tanıdaki doğruluk oranı %96.2 idi. Toplam 45 hastaya acil kolonoskopinin uygulandığı ve bu hastaların 16'sında terapötik kolonoskopi yapıldığı belirlendi. Toplam morbidite ve mortalite oranları sırasıyla %24 ve %12.5 olarak saptandı. Yatış süreleri ise, konservatif tedavi uygulanan ve cerrahi tedavi uygulanan olgularda sırasıyla 1.82 ve 6.50 gün idi. Sonuç: Akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyonda klinik değerlendirme ve bilgisayarlı tomografi incelemesi olguların yönetiminde köşe taşlarını oluşturmaktadır. Cerrahın erken cerrahi tedavi gerektiren akut mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyon olgularını tanımlaması gereklidir; çünkü bu olguların tedavisindeki gecikme, komplikasyon ve ölüm oranlarında ciddi artışla sonuçlanmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, seçilmiş hastalarda endoskopik tedavinin de önemli rol oynadığı akıldan çıkarılmamalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABULUT, M., GÖNENÇ, M., İSLİM, F., KALAYCI, M. U., KAPAN, S., TURHAN, A. N., YIRGIN, H., ALIŞ, H. (2011). Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: A 5-year experience in a training and research hospital. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 10–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/325764

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimarães LS. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. RadioGraphics 2009;29:423–439
  2. Helton WS, Fisichella PM. Intestinal obstruction. In: Wilmore DW, editor. ACS surgery: principles & practice 2007. New York: WebMD Corp.; 2007. Section 5, Chapter 4
  3. Cappell MS, Batke M. Mechanical obstruction of the small bowel and colon. Med Clin N Am 2008;92:575–597
  4. Shrock TR. Small intestine. In: Way LW, editor. Current surgical diagnosis and treatment. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange; 1988. p. 561–585
  5. Frager D. Intestinal obstruction: Role of CT. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2002; 31: 777–799
  6. Brolin RE, Krasna MJ, Marst BA. Use of tubes and radiographs in the management of small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 1987;206:126–133
  7. Ellis CN, Boggs HW Jr, Slagle GW, et al. Small bowel obstruction after colon resection for benign and malignant diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:367–371
  8. Mangili G, Franchi M, Mariani A, et al. Octreotide in the management of bowel obstruction in terminal ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;61:345–348
  9. Brüggmann D, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, Münstedt K, Tinneberg HR, Hackethal A. Intra-abdominal adhesions. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010;107:769–775
  10. MacLean AR, Cohen Z, MacRae HM, et al. Risk of small bowel obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 2002;235:200–206
  11. Athreya S, Moss J, Urquhart G, et al. Colorectal stenting for colonic obstruction: the indications, complications, effectiveness and outcome- 5-year review. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:91–94
  12. Taourel P, Kessler N, Lesnik A, et al. Helical CT of large bowel obstruction. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:267–275
  13. Ge BJ, Huang Q, Liu LM, Bian HP, Fan YZ. Risk factors for bowel resection and outcome in patients with incarcerated groin hernias. Hernia 2010;14:259–264
  14. Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, et al. Etiology of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 2000;180:33–36
  15. Ko YT, Lim JH, Lee DH, et al. Small bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 1993;188:649–653
  16. Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol 1999;40:422– 17) Mallo RD, Salem R, Lalani T, et al. Computed tomography diagnosis of ischemia and complete obstruction in small bowel obstruction: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:690–694
  17. Maglinte DDT, Heitkamp DE, Howard TJ, Kelvin FM, Lappas JC. Current concepts in imaging of small bowel o