Journals / Van Veterinary Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

PCR detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in stray dogs in Batman, Turkey

Pages
183–185
Publication Date
2019-11-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, infection of dogs in Batman province with A. phagocytophilum has been revealed molecularly for the first time with this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Anaplasma phagocytophilum causes high-grade fever in humans, ruminants, horses, cats, and dogs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Blood samples were drawn into EDTA tubes from the venae cephalica antebrachii of randomly selected 97 asymptomatic dogs in total.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, infection of dogs in Batman province with A. phagocytophilum has been revealed molecularly for the first time with this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anaplasma phagocytophilum · Dog · Pathogen

Abstract

Anaplasma phagocytophilum causes high-grade fever in humans, ruminants, horses, cats, and dogs. A. phagocytophilum, which causes granulocytic anaplasmosis in dogs, has a wide geographical distribution in the world, but there are not many studies on the Anaplasma species in dogs in Turkey. A. phagocytophilum, which infects leukocytes in dog, might also be zoonotic. This study aimed to investigate the A. phagocytophilum prevalence in stray dogs in Batman province of Turkey using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique. Blood samples were drawn into EDTA tubes from the venae cephalica antebrachii of randomly selected 97 asymptomatic dogs in total. Identification of A. phagocytophilum was carried out using the conventional PCR method that was conducted by using the DNAs obtained from the samples. A. phagocytophilum prevalence was found to be 3.1% in the examined blood samples. In conclusion, infection of dogs in Batman province with A. phagocytophilum has been revealed molecularly for the first time with this study. It is considered that detection of this species, which can cause disease (Human granulocytic anaplasmosis) in humans as well, has contributed epidemiologically to the data on the spread of the disease throughout Turkey. Moreover, investigating the tick species that transmit the disease in the region where the study was conducted is important for developing effective control strategies against the disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, B., DEGER, S. (2019). PCR detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in stray dogs in Batman, Turkey. Van Veterinary Journal, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 183–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/32531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aktas M, Altay K, Dumanli N (2011). Molecular detection and identification of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in cattle from Turkey. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2, 62-65.
  2. Aktas M, Vatansever Z, Altay K, Aydin MF, Dumanli N (2010). Molecular evidence for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus from Turkey. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 104, 10-15.
  3. Beall MJ, Chandrashekar R, Eberts MD, Cyr KE, Diniz PP, Mainville C, Hegarty BC, Crawford JM, Breitschwerdt EB (2008). Serological and molecular prevalence of Borreliaburgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia species in dogs from Minnesota. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 8, 455-464. Bellstro¨m L (1989). Fa¨stingburnarickettsioser (In Swedish). Svensk Veterina¨rtidning, 41, 549-553. Bjo¨ersdorff A, Christenson D, Johnsson A, Sjo¨ stro¨m AC, Madigan JE (1990). Ehrlichia equi-infektion diagnostiserat hos ha¨st (In Swedish). Svensk Veterina¨rtidning. 42, 357-360.
  4. Carrade D, Foley JE, Borjesson DL, Sykes JE (2009). Canine Granulocytic Anaplasmosis: A Review. J Vet Intern Med, 23(6), 1129-1141.
  5. Christova I, Gladnishka T (2005). Prevalence of infection with Francisella tularensis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensulato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in rodenst from an endemic focus of tularaemia in Bulgaria. Ann Agric Environ Med, 12, 149-152.
  6. Duzlu O, Inci A, Yildirim A, Onder Z, Ciloglu A (2014). Köpeklerde kene kaynaklı bazı protozoon ve rickettsial enfeksiyonların Real Time PCR ile araştırılması ve saptanan izolatların molekuler karakterizasyonları. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 61, 275-282.
  7. Ebani VV, Bertelloni F, Turchi B, Cerri D (2013). Serological and molecular survey of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Italian hunting dogs. Ann Agric Environ Med, 20(2), 289-292.
  8. Eberts MD, Diniz PP, Beall MJ, Stillman BA, Chandrashekar R, Breitschwerdt EB (2011). Typical and atypical manifestations of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 47, 88-94.
  9. Huber D, Rei I, Duvnjank S, Jurković D, Lukačevic D, Pilat M, Beck A, Mihaljević Z, Vojta L, Polkinghorne A, Beck R (2017). Molecular detection of Anaplasma platys, Anaplasma phagocythophilum and Wolbachia sp. but not Ehrlichia canis in Croatian dogs. Parasitol Res, 116, 3019-3026
  10. Jennifer L Granick, P Jane Armstrong, Jeff BB (2009). Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in dogs: 34 cases (2000-2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 234(12), 1559-1565.
  11. Karagenc T, Hosgor M, Bilgic HB, Pasa S, Kirli G, Eren H (2005). The determination of the prevalence of E. canis, A. phagocytophila,