Journals / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 1998 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Whipple procedure traumatic patients: The presentation of three cases

Travmatik hastalarda whipple prosedürü: Üç olgunun sunumu

Pages
111–115
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, we present 3 cases, treated by Whipple procedure for grade 5 pancreas rupture and examine patients for other injuries, postoperative complications and survival.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pancreas injuries cannot be easily noticed because of its anatomic location, clinical presentation and its usually being accompanied with other organ injuries and so attract not enough attention In fact, pancreas injuries in cases of blunt and penetran abdomen traumas are relatively fewer, but not rare.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In these injuries, surgery involves a wide spectrum of the treatment and in 2-3% of them Whipple procedure is needed to be done.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, we present 3 cases, treated by Whipple procedure for grade 5 pancreas rupture and examine patients for other injuries, postoperative complications and survival.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Pancreas injuries cannot be easily noticed because of its anatomic location, clinical presentation and its usually being accompanied with other organ injuries and so attract not enough attention In fact, pancreas injuries in cases of blunt and penetran abdomen traumas are relatively fewer, but not rare. In these injuries, surgery involves a wide spectrum of the treatment and in 2-3% of them Whipple procedure is needed to be done. In this paper, we present 3 cases, treated by Whipple procedure for grade 5 pancreas rupture and examine patients for other injuries, postoperative complications and survival.

Özet

Pankreasın anatomik y eri,eşlik eden diğer organ y aralanmaları ve klinik görünüme bağlı olarak kolayca gözden kaçabilmesi sebebiyle pankreas yaralanmaları önemiölçüsünde dikkati çekmemektedir. Aslında küntvepenetran batın travmalarında pankreas yaralanması nisbeten daha az olmasına karşın nadir de değildir. Bu yaralanmalarda cerrahi tedavi çok geniş bir yelpaze oluştur-maktadır ve % 2-3'ünde travma ağırlığı sebebiyle Whipple prosedürü gerekmektedir. Bu yazımızda kunt ve penetran travma sebebiyle hastanemize başvuran ve grade 5 pankreas rüptürü nedeniyle Whipple prosedürü uygulanan üç olgu sunumuna yer verilmiştir. Hastalar yandaş travmaları, postoperatifkomplikasyonlar, sağkalım açısından incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALKILIÇ, G., ÖNCEL, M., VURAL, S., ACAR, H., OLCAY, E. (1998). Whipple procedure traumatic patients: The presentation of three cases. Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 111–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/325203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Luna GK., Carrico CI:Pancreatic Trauma. In Scheckelfbrds Surgery of Alimentary Tract. Zvideno WB Saunders company, 1996, pp.147-152 2. Timberlake GA. et al: Blunt pancreatic tratuncr:Experience at a rural referral center Am. Surg. 63(11):282-6. 1997 Berry A. RR.: Trauma to the pancreas. In Morris PT, Malt RA (eds.): 0Aford Textbook Surgery. 25.3, New York, Oxford Medical Publications, 1994,pp. 1307-1308 1. Nassoure ZE: Duodenum ve Pancreas Traymasr. ha Kihtir T: Travma Cerrahisi, 1st., UhrsalTrp Kitabevi, 1994, 171-186 Tiberio (;„ De Rai P, Floriani M. ye ark. et al: Pancreatic and Duedonal Injuries, Ann Hal Chin 65(1)81-7, 1994 6. Moore AR., Scott MH.: Pancreas Yaralarunalarr. In Andican A. key. Mt.): Maingot Abdominal Operasyonlar 1st., Nobel Tip Kitabevi, 1990, 1573-1584 7. McKenney MG., Nir I., Levi DM. ve ark. et al: Evolution of minor penetrating duodenal injuries: Am. Slug 62 (11):952-5.1996 8 Richehne N., Benchino! D., Chazel M. ye ark et al: Traumas ofthe duodenum. Ann. Chin: 47 (7): 659-33,1993 Perek S.: Pancreas Yaralarimalari. Ira Minkari T, Onsal G., Kafhdar Y.: Pancreas Cerrahisi, Logos Kitabevi, 1991., 191-206
  2. Vernm GR., Wig-JD., Khania SK. ye ark. et al: Management ofduodenal trauma. Trip Gastroenterol. 15 (1): 23-8, 1994 Minkari T et al: Pancreas. cagdas Cerrahi Dergisi. 1:9, 1987 12. Mancure M., Gains WA et al: Challenges in the Management of Pancreatic and Duodenal Injuries. J. Not! Med. Assoc. 85 (10): 767-72, 1993 13. Ried! S., Buhr HI., Henforth C. et al: Effect of diagnostic imaging techniques on choice of therapy and prognosis of traumatic pancreas and duodenal injuries, Langenbacks Arch. Chir, 379 (1): 38-43, 1994 14. Morales-LinaresJC., Gomez-Mendez TJ., Chan C. Ye ark, et al: Pcmcreaticoduodenectomy in treatment of carcinoma of Voter 's ampulla: Rev. Invest. Clin. 48(3):185-9.1996 15. Chou FE, Sheen-Chen SM., Chen YS. ye ark. et a!:Postoperative morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer: Eur. J. Sing. 162(6): 477-81.1996 16. Traversio LW, Kazarek RA. et a!: Whipple procedure for severe complications of chronic pancreatitis, Arch Surg. 128(9): 1047-50, 1993 17. Swape TJ:, Wide TP., Nevberger TJ. Ve ark. et al: A reappraisal of total paricreatectomyfor pancreatic cancer: Results from US Veterans Affairs Hospitals, 1987-1991. Am.J. Surg. 168(6):582-5,1994 18. Kline G., Lucas CE., Landgerwood AM. Ye ark. Et al: Duedonal Organ Injury Severity (015) and Outcome. Am Surgery 60 (7): 500-4,1994